Egypt uncovers 'Israeli spy ring'

Speaking the truth!!!

By the way the British dont own anything apart from UK, the other nations were hijacked just like Palestina. IsraHell as I like to call it, will never exist in peace until Palestians are given their rights and land back.

I seriously feel like I'm wasting time arguing here because all the arguments I've read from the zionists (including Borismor's) don't actually back any of the heinous crimes Israel has made and yet they're arguing for them.
.

I seriously feel like I'm wasting time arguing here because all the arguments I've read from the zionists (including Borismor's) don't actually back any of the heinous crimes Israel has made and yet they're arguing for them.

None of the Zionists recognise the Palestinians as humans with homes.

Cba with the rest of the post, but no... being British mandate does not mean that the country 'belonged to the British'. Palestine (Transjordan) was not a part of the empire.

India was owned by the Mughal empire and after the successive sultans in their principalities until the East India company 'claimed ownership'

End result. Desqualified for leaving out the important bits unless you don't really have any knowledge of it.

Oh look it's the anti-semite card even though I said nothing to suggest snti-semitism. And if you had any knowledge of what's going on in Israel then you would know how much of a fool you sound agreeing with Stalin.

After Israel stole Arab land.

I never said that, though I guessed in advance you would resort to personal attacks rather than factual arguments. I simply said that prior to 1947 no Arab was evicted. In fact, I was answering this sentence of yours:




Which insinuated that the Jews simply immigrated and started getting violent. That was not the case during decades of immigration, despite countless Arab attacks. The actuall displacement you speak of occured 60 years after immigration began, during a war for survival in which both sides commited ethnic cleansing. The 1 million Jews ethnically cleansed from the Arab world were re-settled while the Palestinians were kept by the Arab brethren in camps, to be used as political tools for 60 years.

This is how the Palestinian refugee tragedy occured. A little different than "Murderous zionist monsters came with their laser beams and raped their way through innocent Palestine". Now you get the difference between hyperbolic propagandistic oversimplification and history?

It may have claimed ownership, but it still ruled over a large part of the Indian subcontinent and thus it ruled India.

i was replying to your comment:
Originally Posted by ilovedubstep
Don't be stupid. It wasn't our land really. Just like India was never really our land.

..........
As for India, it was owned by the East India Company until it got itself into a spot of bother and vested its powers in Victoria. So, yes, India was British.

Britain tried to rule India, they did succeed partially by ruling large areas of land although not the whole Indian subcontinent however there rule was short-lived compared to Indian dynasties that ruled long before.

Britain or its counterpart the East India Company never 'owned' India.
If they did they wouldn't have had widespread rebellions.
India was owned - is owned by INDIANS.
The word OWNED connotates much more than RULED.

The British Raj was ruled and belonged to the United Kingdom; whether there were rebellions is irrelevant. As soon as a piece of land is under direct rule, it therefore belongs to whoever's ruling it.

Nevertheless India never did belong to Britain,
Britain acquired it through means highly unpopular with the indian populace,
Subsequently Britain was forced to let go of India
Thus proving India NEVER really belonged to Britain,
if it did it would still be in British hands today.

Oh look it's the anti-semite card even though I said nothing to suggest snti-semitism. And if you had any knowledge of what's going on in Israel then you would know how much of a fool you sound agreeing with Stalin.

First of all the Palestinians were promised that land from the British and then came the Jewish settlers who claim the land because of religious reasons.

And what about post 1947? When Israel just decide to force Palestinians out of their homes.

None of the Zionists recognise the Palestinians as humans with homes.

How it acquired it is irrelevant. The fact that it had direct rule over the subcontinent proves that it belonged to Britain.

You sound like some butt-hurt Indian who resents everything British, then again, by all means whine - it just adds to the amusement.