The Student Room Group

Government Wants to Regulate Internet Porn

Scroll to see replies

Yeahh, cause it will just be so easy to find each website containing porn, and block it.

David cameron, you a jebend.
Original post by sixthformer
I'm chuffed the government are taking steps to protect people from viewing things that only damadge them.

What kind of a man or women would even allow themselves to be filmed doing inappropriate things...


There is no evidence AT ALL to show me that porn effects anyone viewing it, in anyway, at all.
**** I've seen people shot in the face on the internet, doesn't mean im a crazy son of a bitch too, does it.

And I agree with your second statement (the bald-ed part)
Original post by OMGWTFBBQ
Tissues? They're too thin.

Loo roll is more like it.


Have you got corrosive jizz or something, son? Kleenex are more than up to the job - in fact they're designed for it (ever wondered why they're called Mansize? :wink:)
Reply 143
Original post by Addzter
Christ, that's amazing! I was thinking we could also get one of the big tissue companies to sponsor the march, as they'll lose a large amount of custom if this comes into force.


I can see it now the facebook groups, the posters, the megaphones, the billboards.

all for the Kleenex "**** for Freedom" campaign
Original post by Liam 09
Oh come on this is ridiculous now. There are so many things harming our society but they go after a bit of adult entertainment.. that really is not harming younger kids who watch it. I wasn't traumatised at all when I first saw at a pretty young age..


This.
Parents are all a bit naive to think their children do not know what sex is at the age of say...10. They might not know the ins, and outs of it, but my god they know the basics!
Original post by Dan3va
I can see it now the facebook groups, the posters, the megaphones, the billboards.

all for the Kleenex "**** for Freedom" campaign


This is going to be big. Raising our tuitiuon fees was one thing Cameron, but if you think you can take away our precious porn, you've got another bloody thing coming. :jitsu:
Reply 146
Original post by lonelykatana
This.
Parents are all a bit naive to think their children do not know what sex is at the age of say...10. They might not know the ins, and outs of it, but my god they know the basics!


ins and outs

nice pun sir I like your style
Original post by lonelykatana
There is no evidence AT ALL to show me that porn effects anyone viewing it, in anyway, at all.
**** I've seen people shot in the face on the internet, doesn't mean im a crazy son of a bitch too, does it.

And I agree with your second statement (the bald-ed part)


you view other people losing all morals
you lose your respect to women tbh or men..
it can damadge relationships
your partner is not enough for you...
ps,i am no role model, i am merely saying what i think is true
I don't think so. If the "government" think everyone will just take this sitting down they better think again. They will get their fat bureaucratic asses spammed by 4chan and every single porn watcher in the UK who knows how to hack. And maybe then they will learn to back down and keep their place. I'm sick of the damn government always interfereing in our business and stuff they don't even know a crap about.

:mad:
(edited 13 years ago)
That is outrageous.
Original post by jismith1989
A good idea; pornography's become too pervasive in our general culture.



(Awaiting neg rep from the febrile-groined teens that populate this place. :biggrin:)


Sorry Grandad.
Reply 151
Original post by Addzter
This is going to be big. Raising our tuitiuon fees was one thing Cameron, but if you think you can take away our precious porn, you've got another bloody thing coming. :jitsu:


yea look at it this way

students dont like fees
students like porn

students riot over fees
students Will riot over porn

combine the two and we will have a revolution. we are overdue a revolution its been a while since we had one.

we would even have the support of non-students especially the back bench MP's, what do you tthink that they get up to in the back benches?

and i recon that we could do a better job at running the country

lets **** our way to victory
(edited 13 years ago)
Reply 152
Doesn't stop children's role models nor does it get rid of the top shelves of magazines. I think the government should focus on crime and underage alcohol abuse before they try to label innocent, harmless perverts wanting a quick tug.
If they ban porn nobody will know which hole to put it in :eek:

Dillema right there!
I would say the thongs for 6-year-olds, the women in pop videos gyrating with barely anything on, the magazines obsessed with image and body... I'd say these had a worse effect on kids than porn does, because not only are they exposed to it at a younger age, there's no stigma, no "this is dirty/wrong" air around it. It's completely normal. Whereas a child of around 12 watching porn knows they're looking at something they're not really meant to be.
Reply 155
This doesn't cover the fact that most of the porn I looked at when I was a "child" (13-17) was on "legitimate" sites such as deviantart etc., and I'm sure that was the same for a lot of teenagers, especially girls. I was too scared of viruses to go to actual hardcore video sites, and besides, that kind of porn would probably have been too much. Shoddily rendered Harry Potter slash was more than enough for me, and if they want to try and censor that kind of thing, good luck to them- it's everywhere.
Reply 156
hack in my neighbors wifi :P
kidding

I think they should be blocking sexual related adds first then porn, just cheking your email and the side ads are sexually related, as well other normal sites.

Thank goodness for adblock, but most adults dont know how to use it or lockdown their computers yet let their kids use it, then get furious that its so easily accessed.

-_-
(edited 13 years ago)
Original post by sixthformer
I'm chuffed the government are taking steps to protect people from viewing things that only damadge them.

What kind of a man or women would even allow themselves to be filmed doing inappropriate things...


I'm wondering if your being serious or sarcastic.

So this is the kind of crap these guys are being paid for, lay off frontline fighters but keep the blocks with the ludicrous ideas in employment - freaking A
I don't think people necessarily have a problem with their name on the "porn database" I think it's because it's a pretty basic need for people and now we have to ask for permission.
Original post by Addzter
Anyone fancy marching on Westminster brandishing packs of Kleenex? I've already got a chant sorted: "1, 2, 3, 4, stop trying to ban our porn! 5, 6, 7, 8, how else will we masturbate?!"


Quite incredible. I would love to see thousands of seedy men and women come on Westminster. Quite literally.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending