EDL or UAF?

Scroll to see replies

Before I would have said neither. It is now evident that the pretense of peacefully protesting against 'Islamic Extremism' is swiftly being left behind & they are now simply targeting Islam. As can be seen in Tommy Robinson's Christmas message & EDL Leader: Guramit Singh's latest Peterborough speech. This actually scares me, before I thought they were a joke, but now that they are targetting all of Islam, I think I am going to have to get out their & march too. The UAF now actually represent a real struggle against Fascism.

We live in a democracy - just like Muslims can come here and protest for Sharia, people can protest against religion if they so wish. Except people like UAF think they decide who should be able to protest.

Reply 21

Manitude

I dislike them both but if I really had to choose then EDL on the basis that I agree more should be done to aid their *main* and *official* cause, and they're not massive hippocrites.

Reply 22

hamijack

Original post by Aphotic Cosmos

The riot police.

No. Never the riot police.

Hope not Hate FTW!

EDL.

Original post by robbo3045

Sorry preaching hatred against a racial/religious group is not apart of democracy, that is fascism.

Reply 25

Aphotic Cosmos

Original post by hamijack

No. Never the riot police.

Hope not Hate FTW!

Hmm.

No.

I hope the police kick the crap out of both of them on as many occasions as possible.

Reply 26

Inversion

The UAF are actually quite funny in how paradoxical they are. They are apparently against the free speech of groups like the EDL, which seems rather fascist in itself. I don't agree with nationalism or the EDL either.

Reply 27

Fusilero

I would, due to certain issues, be forced to side with the UAF. Not that they're particularly great people as it stands though but between a bucket of crap and a crate of crap I'll take the bucket.

Reply 28

DJkG.1

Whoever is fighting the police.

DJkG.1 = always up for a riot. :awesome:

(Cause is irrelevant).

Reply 29

Sendaii

Neither, I hate them both. I hate how UAF are seen as OK because they are supposedly "anti-fascism and anti-racism". Yeah, so anti-fascism that they will assault you if you don't agree :rolleyes:

Reply 30

B-Man.

Too many people are basing their opinions on the 'Old' EDL stance, Just watch EDL Leader Stephen 's (AKA Tommy Robinson) most recent speech in Petersborough.

I quote him as saying "Islam has never been a religion of peace & it never will be!."
So much for only opposing Islamic extremism & not the peaceful Muslims. Apparently they don't even exist.

Reply 31

lukejoshjedi

Neither, prefer anarchists over both

They are all mongs.

Original post by B-Man.

are you serious?

Reply 34

robbo3045

Original post by B-Man.

Sorry preaching hatred against a racial/religious group is not apart of democracy, that is fascism.

Against a race, yes it is. Against a religion. No it's not. They are completely within their rights to protest against religion. Which from what I can see, is what they do.

Sure they have some ignorant toads within them, that take it a step further and jump on the band wagon... but that's just like the student fees riots.

Reply 35

Broderss

Original post by FloydHead

Personally, I side with the UAF.

Oh, you mean the bigoted retards who want to exercise their freedom of speech to crush the freedoms of others? Don't be stupid. They are the real fascists.

Reply 36

HornAfrican

I don't like either of them but I'd side with the UAF simply because the EDL are scum and I'd never see myself chanting racist rhymes, making nazi salutations and intimidating people.