Law Applicants 2011 Offer Thread

Wow, that's crazy. Maybe it was your personal statement? Anyway, with grades like that, I'm guessing you've got offers from equally good unis

aww crap, i got 18 on the LNAT too ):
where else did you apply?

Thanks I don't think it was my p/s.

My others are

Cambridge - Rejection post interview
KCL rejection
Warwick AAAc
Nottingham Pending
Leeds AAA

I was very lucky that all my uni's were russel group.

I am hoping to gain the choice o either Notts or Warwick which to be honnest are better uni's then KCL anyway. If not I am hap to go t Warwick oe of the best in the UK!

I got rejected with:

GCSEs - 8A* 2B
AS Level AAAA with UMS average of 97/100
Predictions A*A*A
LNAT 18

They clearly didn't want me!

keep your chin up mate, your grades are brilliant and i am sure your lnat score won't effect your application to other universities, UCL are very strict on the LNAT, have you applied elswhere?

Me too! Let's wallow in our misery together )): where else have you applied?

How was your LNAT may I ask? I kind of expected a rejection from UCL as soon as I received my LNAT. Still had a bit of hope for a miracle though, but knew that I had very little chance since KCL had already rejected me.
But I have to get over this ). Life is still isnt too bad anyhow I managed to get an offer from LSE which I will firm.
What about you ?

These are the offers I got so far:
Warwick: 38 points IB
SOAS: 38 points IB with 766 HL
LSE: 38 points IB with 766 HL

Still waiting on QMUL........

Does anyone know when Queen Mary, Bristol and UCL usually finsh there replies. At the moment i scan my inbox about five times a day.

just wondering, what did you get predicted in the IB?

and also, what was your fifth uni choice?

Anyone have any idea when we'll hear back from Warwick/UCL?

I applied to Cambridge but I didnt go to the interview :/
My predicted in IB is 38 pts (exclude bonus pt)

nottingham or ucl for M100? can't decide...

Did anyone else feel the LNAT could have been a good aptitude test if we were actually given enough time to properly understand the text and discriminate between the answers

It seems that a lot of very clever people- grades wise have not got good LNAT scores and its a little unfair how all your hard work is destroyed by a stupid test that some excellent universities such as LSE, Warwick, Cambridge for example dont even use as they have said its not an appropriate indicator and other unis that use it such as Bristol and Birgimham are now sort of ignoring (giving people offers with quite low LNAT scores)

Whats the point of setting an aptitude test that most of these unis do not think is an accurate reflection of your ability
Maybe it should be more like the American aptitude test it seems like a better idea..................this was not so much of an actual aptitude test but rather how fast coud you read and click answers!

Yeah sorry just my little rant there............

I definitely agree with most of what you've said, but I bet that you wouldn't feel like that if UCL had given you an offer.