Msc Finance at Warwick : impressive figures

what course did u get into P.E???

All courses are 4 units including the MSc Economics and LLM. I guess they're ****

For your information, the Msc accounting, organisation and Institutions is by far more selective than the CRAPPY Msc accounting and finance

174 from 1056 for A&F = 16,5%

And only 19 over 529 for A,O&I = 3,59 % like the Msc Finance

3,59 % for the Msc accounting, organisation and institutions VS 16,5% for A&F

Give me objective arguments not blabla and resentful statements

you annoy everyone in this forum ProspectiveEconomist

For your information, the Msc accounting, organisation and Institutions is by far more selective than the CRAPPY Msc accounting and finance

174 from 1056 for A&F = 16,5%

And only 19 over 529 for A,O&I = 3,59 % like the Msc Finance

3,59 % for the Msc accounting, organisation and institutions VS 16,5% for A&F

Give me objective arguments not blabla and resentful statements

you annoy everyone in this forum ProspectiveEconomist

^ I'm afraid you're going to make a huge mistake in choosing Imperial MSc Finance over LSE's MSc Accounting and Finance. But then again, it's how you'll make your degree work out for you, in the end.

What utter toss.

why so?

why so?

decided on where ur going peaches???

not at all, I'm gonna wait and see what happens with Imperial and the Scholarship. I was very cheeky and emailed the head recruitment lady at Imperial and told them about my scholarship to warwick. She said it isnt possible to give an indication of who will get a scholarship, but that she was impressed with my application, so I will be seriously considered. I'm guessing thats a standard response, and it probably wont come to anything, but I can hope.

As it stands (I am making a huge assumption that I may get an A&F offer from LSE), these are my rankings (which I will say, change almost weekly):

With both scholarship offers and LSE:

Imperial
LSE
Warwick


With no LSE offer:

Probably Warwick (a £15,000 difference in tution fees alone makes it difficult to turn down, although, I still prefer the Imperial course)
Imperial

LSE offer, one scholarship:

No idea. Value for money, Warwick. Prestige LSE. Prestige and course content Imperial (at a massively higher cost).

For the moment, I may prefer living in Coventry, but (assuming I may get some interviews), traveling to London can be a bit of an arse when compared to the other 2.

From the beginning I said I would always pick Imperial, but the difference in getting an interview with each uni is probably very small, so who knows

U've prioratised everthing nicely.. .. neways good luck with everything.. hopefully things will turn out the way you want them to.. btw, did u apply to the finance program at Cambridge as well??

Ahhhh yes, and I didnt get in. I'm not actually too fussed. Im not saying that it wouldnt have been nice, but I dont think I'm going down the PhD route so such a theory based course may not have been in my best interests, but a choice of Cambirdge would have been nice. I was more dissapointed with not getting into the finance programme at LSE, this one I felt wasnt too bad either way.

May I ask you Peaches when did you apply for the mphil in Finance in Cambridge? and when did you get your rejection? I have also applied but still no answer..

For your information, the Msc accounting, organisation and Institutions is by far more selective than the CRAPPY Msc accounting and finance

174 from 1056 for A&F = 16,5%

And only 19 over 529 for A,O&I = 3,59 % like the Msc Finance

3,59 % for the Msc accounting, organisation and institutions VS 16,5% for A&F

Give me objective arguments not blabla and resentful statements

you annoy everyone in this forum ProspectiveEconomist

Reading this thread makes me puke.

Can you please stop posting enrolment percentages as an indicator of ANYTHING? Enrolment=/=Offers. 174 from 1000something means that 174 of the applicants accepted their offer. It doesn’t actually state how many offers have been sent out. What you are trying to get at is Warwick being so prestigious because only 3% got an offer, but the fact is, only 3% took up on their offer. The rest either were unsuccessful, or went somewhere else. Statistics, and logical reasoning as whole, is obviously not your forte.

Another hilarious fact is how prospectiveeconomist thinks knowing a “bric-language”, which in his case is Indian, is so amazing. Mate, get off your high horse, 1/6 of the world knows Indian, and better yet, many Indians are fluent in English. ****ing tool.