Do you agree with military action in Libya (poll included.

People are brainwashed in North Korea, though. If the people there complain, they are removed.

You're accusing me of being naive, where do you get your info, Sky News? CNN? Directly from the UN who obviously wouldn't go about proclaimed civilian deaths?

So you think that no innocent civilians have been killed so far right?

And IF the principle of the UN 'intervention' (invasion) is to remove Gaddafi because he is killing his own people then it would be pretty hypocritical to go about removing him in a way which will also cause massive civilian deaths (directly through air strikes and the like and indirectly from the fighting caused by the invasion). Unless you are so naive as to believe this won't be the case?

Yes. The Libyan people have asked for our help, and we shall rightly support them, paving the way for freedom of choice for all. With our help, the Libyan people should stand a better chance of removing their vicious despot from power.

The rebels represent the majority of the Libyan people, how else do you explain the fact that they took pretty much the whole of the country, bar Tripoli and Sirte, the only two towns where people are openly in support of Gaddafi?

Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Yemen are not yet armed revolutions, if and when they are then I would fully support an international intervention if it was asked for by the pro-democracy revolutionaries.

Well when armed men go into a city everyday people aren't exactly going to disagree with them are they!
You cannot claim that they represent the majority because you can't know that.
I doubt the British public would support their armed forces going into Libya, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain AND Yemen whilst there are still troops in Iraq but that's just my opinion.
It's interesting how countries such as China, Germany and Russia who have some of the biggest defence forces decided not to take part.

That is an epic fail of an epic fail picture.

Where do you get your info from?

Well by your own logic you can't know that they aren't the majority of the people. BTW, are you dumb? Because British forces pulled out of Iraq ages ago.... Also we aren't going to send ground troops to any of these countries, the UN didn't clear that and there is no political support for it.

China, Russia and Germany didn't take part, so what? They don't have to intervene if they don't want to, they may feel like they are undermining the credibility of the revolution, which is a perfectly valid excuse.

Prize for post 123! Bravo.

Do you not see it as completely foolish to be supporting these 'rebels' when we have absolutely no idea who the hell they are, or what they represent?

They would do better ........starting with their economies

Ha I meant Afghanistan, calm down. People on here get so excited.
My point is still that they do not represent the Libyan people; everybody has seen some of the protesters supporting Gaddafi. Just because they have the Arab League's backing, which again does not represent Libyans, doesn't mean they have the right to start bombing the country and consequently killing some of the innocent civilians they went in to protect.
I doubt that none of the countries involved will send in ground troops, it will happen eventually.