Homosexuality encouraged in schools.

I don't think homosexuality per-se, I've personally never been encouraged nor was the topic ever brought up throughout my time in high school and the BNP is full of **** in general, but feminization of men? it can be arguable. But this is on a societal sense not school. Last week I went into River Island in what I thought was the "Men's" section and I was like there were crop tops, uber tight and some weird looking jeans, men's jewellery etc and it's strange as I bought one of my favourite pair of jeans from river Island a couple of years ago and their style changed completely. I don't know what that's suggesting.

I never sat down and weighed up the pros and cons of going to uni, I just felt that was the normal/right/obvious thing to do. Just like I never had a nice long, hard, sweaty think about if I prefer girls or boys. I just knew.

I don't consider them to be exactly analogous themes, and I do think that something as basic as broad sexual preference comes from a deeper place than uni choice, but it's not without influence from the environment.

I don't think homosexuality per-se, I've personally never been encouraged nor was the topic ever brought up throughout my time in high school and the BNP is full of **** in general, but feminization of men? it can be arguable. But this is on a societal sense not school. Last week I went into River Island in what I thought was the "Men's" section and I was like there were crop tops, uber tight and some weird looking jeans, men's jewellery etc and it's strange as I bought one of my favourite pair of jeans from river Island a couple of years ago and their style changed completely. I don't know what that's suggesting.

What, Stonewall are distributing packs that are going to turn the poor kiddies into raving homosexuals?


No-one's saying that something's acceptable just because humans or animals do it, but I don't think I shouldn't have to point out that cannibalism and homosexuality aren't comparable. Who exactly is harmed or loses their life where homosexuality is concerned?

Of course it is ok to hold an opinion, but that doesnt make your opinion right.

There are THOUSANDS of rational reasons to accept homosexuality. The best I think, is that it doesnt cause anybody any harm.

Saying that there is a right sexuality is like saying that there is a right colour to paint a wall. It's ridiculous. It's about taste.

The person I quoted just did, so do a lot of others. So you just debunked that whole argument. We agree then.

Anyway, the rest of my post (which you only quote part of) explains my stance. The state can't tell people what to believe. Whether it is for a religious or personal reason, they are perfectly entitled to be against homosexuality as long as nobody is harmed.


It doesn't cause anybody harm in holding the view that homosexuality is wrong by that logic. It's not a thought crime.

That's why it's a bad analogy. There is an emotional element to sexual preference, whereas there isn't with University

, so it coming from a much deeper place isn't an insignificant factor

so it doesn't logically lead to the conclusion that environmental factors are influential.

And what happens if some men decide to dress more feminine?

How is that relevant to, er, anything? River Island sell men's jewellery, therefore it's now a shop for the gheys? Right...

And what happens if some men decide to dress more feminine? Is there a bomb somewhere that I dont know about that is going to explode if too many men wear feminine clothes?

What happens?

What are the consequences?

This is what I'm talking about exactly, this is problem with society today, you get overly aggressive and defensive individuals as yourself as Silent ninja perfectly said, trying to ram their beliefs down other people throats. Besides the fact your sentence is an oxymoron, some of us men, like to be men and don't find the sight or the fact that tight jeans and the whole other assortment of over feminine clothing has become common place.

Or aren't we allowed to hold these views

sorry I'm still going to say it.



It's relevant in the fact that society is overwhelming pushing the feminine and androgynous ideal of a man and men in general. And who mentioned gays? there's a difference between the two.

I think when you get a bit older and see with a wider perspective on society, you see how all these things fit together and work to create a certain world. Looking at individual factors, nothing seems to make a difference to anything - why does it matter if I drop that bit of litter? Who cares if I speed sometimes? So what if fewer children have two parents?

Some people surely do long for a society where men are essentially like women with dicks, without any typical masculine traits - and that's fine. But it's so naive to think it just makes no difference, that everything would stay the same except for that one particular factor.

It's ****ing disgusting, let kids have their innocence and don't force vile stuff about any form of sexuality down their throats. In my opinion it's propaganda of the highest order - forcing anything upon someone from such a young age is disgraceful. Stonewall are totalitarian scum for doing this.

Let people live freely.

Its a shame that you dont think that gay people should be able to live freely.

I find that quite vague, I'm not sure what you mean.

My analogy wasn't meant to lead to that conclusion. That conclusion is already evident and I didn't think it was seriously contested by anyone.

Im not trying to ram my beliefs down other peoples throats, I am trying to get people to defend their beliefs.

Has it occured to you that your tastes may not represent the tastes of all men?


If a man decides to dress like a woman and take it up the ass, what effect does it have on your life? Go ahead, explain it to me.

Holding it doesnt cause harm, expressing it does.

Now, please enlighten me as to why it is right to be homophobic

True, I suppose the only people who would be offended by this is people who feel threatened by homosexuality.

It's ****ing disgusting, let kids have their innocence and don't force vile stuff about any form of sexuality down their throats. In my opinion it's propaganda of the highest order - forcing anything upon someone from such a young age is disgraceful. Stonewall are totalitarian scum for doing this.

Let people live freely.