What did the cuts march achieve?

Whether we like it or not, the cuts are necessary to get the public finances in order.

ok, thats like saying its not going to make a difference if 1 person takes enviromental meassures, so lets none of us bother
with your kinda thinking look what happened to Ireland

What happened in Ireland is far more to do with the instability of their banks, and the far bigger relative cost of bailing them out than here in the UK from what I can gather. The situations aren't really comparable.

If we were going by your view the exact same thing would have happened. we did bail our banks out, early on in the process which prevented a dominos effect (banks rely on each other in times of crisis), but to say that we wouldn't have had a sitation like Irelands is extremly niave. the reason they needed to be bailed out was because they couldnt get a loan from anyone due to the national debt becoming so large noone would lend them money in the traditional way
even when the tories got in our economy was still shooting down hill and we would have been in so much debt that we would not have been able to get any loans. It is only by the drastic cuts that we can still get the loans

It showed that Ed Miliband really is completely out of touch with reality and is begging to be made a puppet by the unions. He had no right to be part of a demonstration when just under a year ago intended to make cuts that were just as bad.

And the police are completely and utterly useless. If this was the USA those anarchists would be locked up in hours.

You're confusing the national debt and the budget deficit. They're two different things, so I get the impression you don't really know what you're talking about ...

Cuts are neccessary but not what Cameron has chosen to cut. We need to start with cutting Trident not our education.

And this is why our country and DEMOCRACY is going to ****

What would have happened if our ancestors allowed the elites to do whatever they wanted?????
The conservatives did not win the election outright, they with the Lib dems could be deemed as an unelected parliament
People elected them on false grounds ( for example tuition fees, their pledge that they wouldnt touch the NHS now they are practically trying to privatise it)

Without people protesting even if it is small, then we would have no say whatsoever

So when has this worked before:
-Poll tax in the 1980s
-French revolution in 1789 and other subsequent ones
-Cuban Revolution
Lots of others, im not gonna make a list, thats why we need to learn about history!

We have not always had the rights we have now, or the services, we FOUGHT for them and we should FIGHT AGAIN TO KEEP THEM. People our age are too short sighted and sucked into capitalism and making money

These people are not saying to not cut because obviously we need it but they are saying to not CUT AS FAST AND TO LEAVE FRONT LINE SERVICES ALONE
Even America is cutting over a 10 year period not a 4 year one, yet again the poorest lose out
The government have money for trident and the Olympics but nothing to invest for the NHS


One last thing...........in 1945 we had the largest national debt yet the government built the whole welfare state and as a country and economy we came out just fine and our heath and welfare service is commended throughout the world...there are faults but nothing is perfect and we can fix those without privatisation

In addition, the best healthcare system in the world and most advanced is in Cuba a communist country

Can I just say, REVOLUTION, is very different to PROTEST.

Anarchists or simply a expected function within a democracy? Lol the country of FREEDOM would lock them up?

Cuts are neccessary but not what Cameron has chosen to cut. We need to start with cutting Trident not our education.

Whilst the cuts are necessary at some point, they're not necessary at this speed and ferocity, which is what I think the march was about.