On first glance I thought that C would go up as the system on the left had a total mass of 5kg and it would be obvious that C would rise up as 5kg > 4kg.
However I believe that the tensions in the smaller pulley would cancel out and in effect just leave a mass of 1kg on the left and therefore C would fall down at an acceleration of 3/5 g.
Of course I am probably wrong as I am really bad at these kind of puzzles.
A long and tedious series of equations, which I am sure no-one is interested in unless it comes to a tie-breaker, leads me to think that C will stay where it is.
Although it is very non-intuitive, I have to agree with Pangol. However, I believe it's possible to show that with just two equations with a good thought experiment
Spured on my Jaroc's assertion that this only takes two equations, I tried to simplify my argument, and while I've certainly done that, I can't claim to have it as concise as he suggests is possible.
First, just consider A and B passing over the lower pully. Two applications of Newton's Second Law tell us that, if T1 is the tension in the string joining A and B and a1 is the downwards acceleration of A, then
3g−T1=3a1 T1−g=a1
Adding these together gives us that a1=2g, from which we can see that T1=23g.
Now consider the smaller pulley and C. Two applications of Newton's Second Law tell us that, if T2 is the tension in the string joining the smaller pulley and C and a2 is the upwards acceleration of C, then
g+3g−T2=a2 T2−4g=a2
Adding these together gives us that a2=0, and so C stays where it is.
Can someone explain why it is there only 4g of force acting on the pulley on the left?
The reason why it's equal to 4g is really only shown in the maths that you can see in post #9 I take it you mean that the downwards force is 4g and this balances the upwards force of 4g in the tension in the string joining the mass C This seems to contradict the fact that there is 5kg on the left and 4kg on the right.
Think this way. If masses A and B were equal and both 1.5kg then the whole system would be in equilibrium and there would be no movement of any masses or pulleys. There would be 4 kg on both sides. Masses A and B together would pull down on the left pulley with a force of 3g. The left pulley is 1g. If you arrange it so that A and B are not equal, then A and B accelerate up or down due to their different weights. This changes the tension in the string joining them. This change in the tension unbalances the system. It reduces the overall downward force on the left pulley. Imagine that mass B had no "weight". Mass A would accelerate downwards and there would actually be no tension in the string joining them. The only downwards force on the left would then be the pulley itself. The larger the difference in weight between masses A and B, the smaller the tension in their string, and the smaller the force pulling down on the left pulley. It just happens with these mass values that the tension in the string joining masses A and B is such that the two masses pull down on the left pulley with a force of 3g. This combined with the mass of the left pulley equals 4g. This balances mass C. But really, the answer lies in the maths and the solution of F=ma applied to the 3 masses and left pulley.
The reason why it's equal to 4g is really only shown in the maths that you can see in post #9 I take it you mean that the downwards force is 4g and this balances the upwards force of 4g in the tension in the string joining the mass C This seems to contradict the fact that there is 5kg on the left and 4kg on the right.
Think this way. If masses A and B were equal and both 1.5kg then the whole system would be in equilibrium and there would be no movement of any masses or pulleys. There would be 4 kg on both sides. Masses A and B together would pull down on the left pulley with a force of 3g. The left pulley is 1g. If you arrange it so that A and B are not equal, then A and B accelerate up or down due to their different weights. This changes the tension in the string joining them. This change in the tension unbalances the system. It reduces the overall downward force on the left pulley. Imagine that mass B had no "weight". Mass A would accelerate downwards and there would actually be no tension in the string joining them. The only downwards force on the left would then be the pulley itself. The larger the difference in weight between masses A and B, the smaller the tension in their string, and the smaller the force pulling down on the left pulley. It just happens with these mass values that the tension in the string joining masses A and B is such that the two masses pull down on the left pulley with a force of 3g. This combined with the mass of the left pulley equals 4g. This balances mass C. But really, the answer lies in the maths and the solution of F=ma applied to the 3 masses and left pulley.
weight of A=3g weight of B=1g 3g-1g=2g weight of small pulley= 2g total wight of small pulley and A+B= 4g weight of C=4g weight of C acts in oposite direction to pulley+A+B therefore resultant=0 done.
Another quiet Friday afternoon, so it's time for another puzzle / problem to occupy those idle hours.
The three masses are attached to the pulleys as shown and are supported underneath initially.
When the support is removed, what will happen to mass C. Will it go up, down or stay where it is?
All other information is in the diagram.
Post your thoughts here if you like.
Answer on Sunday evening.
Very sorry to resurrect this thread. I've been working through Stonebridge's puzzles and am stuck with this one.
From working on the masses A and B, I get the tension in the string to be 1.5g N and the acceleration of mass A downwards to be 0.5g.
However, when taking into account the forces acting on the 1 kg pulley... If you were to apply Newton's Second Law would the equation you get be something like this. (Call the upwards acceleration of c to be a m/s^2 and the tension in the string towards the pulley T)
3g+g+g-T=a ?
Somebody made a previous post and said the equation would be 3g+g-T=a and I can't see why I am wrong? Help please
Very sorry to resurrect this thread. I've been working through Stonebridge's puzzles and am stuck with this one.
From working on the masses A and B, I get the tension in the string to be 1.5g N and the acceleration of mass A downwards to be 0.5g.
However, when taking into account the forces acting on the 1 kg pulley... If you were to apply Newton's Second Law would the equation you get be something like this. (Call the upwards acceleration of c to be a m/s^2 and the tension in the string towards the pulley T)
3g+g+g-T=a ?
Somebody made a previous post and said the equation would be 3g+g-T=a and I can't see why I am wrong? Help please
You've used the masses. What you need to do is consider the fact the forces of the left pulley aren't due to the masses but the tension. So the force on the left rope is the mass of the left pulley plus 2*tension of the lower rope.
You've used the masses. What you need to do is consider the fact the forces of the left pulley aren't due to the masses but the tension. So the force on the left rope is the mass of the left pulley plus 2*tension of the lower rope.
Which gives
2*(3/2)g +g -T=a
Oh I see. Of course, I was being very silly. Thank you!!