Original post by River85That's completely unworkable, or certainly very difficult.
You also ned to consider family size, mortgage..
£15,000 is not much more than minmimum wage. If that person is the main household earner, and has a mortgage and family to feed, then you really expect him or to to "pay back" the state? If they're circumstances changed, then yes, why not? I didn't ask them to have kids did I? That's THEIR choice. If they do something stupid, they should be held responsible.
And before you say it, yes, I am aware that students are expected to pay their loan back at this amount. However, the difference is that studying for the degree and taking the loan was utlimately their choice. Someone who takes forced redundancy, or who becomes ill, did not do so out of choice. No, but someone who has had kids, has done so out of choice.
Moreoever, most graduates will be in their 20s and therefore unlikely to have a mortgage or family. Yes, I'm aware they they'd like to get onto the housing ladder and start a family but they know in advance they need to pay this money back and therefore plan their life as well as they can. Why should we when the people who do nothing will never pay any of it back even if their circumstances change?
Meaning that they have paid into the pot, therefore deserve to take what they need (not necessarily want) from the pot. Why should they pay twice?
That's what the welfare state is, or is intended to be, a safety net. You will possibly benefit it it yourself eventually. You go to the NHS for treatment? You're planning on taking a state pension? Are you going to have kids? How do you know you'll always be employed all your life? How do you know you'll never be sick? It's not a safety net when people intentionally have kids that they full well know that they can't afford to have.
What??? Do you have any idea what council tax is?
Council tax is what you pay the council for local services (street cleaning, parks, refuse collection and so on). The amount you pay is based on the valuation of your home (in 1991, I think). It's not just for those who are in council houses....
I know it isn't, but housing 'some' people is one of the services the council provides (at a heavily subsidised amount of rent), and students never get to benefit from it, yet plenty of people who have a reasonable income do.
Full time students are exempt from paying this. Part-time students are not, though they are entitled to claim for council tax benefit (which will be awardeD)
And here we go again...all people claiming benefits are "chavs".
I don't know about chavs, but I certainly do know of families living on benefits who find it a struggle to feed themselves and certainly don't go on expensive holidays.
So, instead of targeting the cheats and making the system fairer (which is far more difficult that you imagine), you want to punish everyone claiming benefits even if it means plunging many families and individuals even further into relative poverty? Families-pffft! I don't care if the spoilt brats don't get an XBox for Christmas, that isn't poverty! Far to much food is binned in this country and if it came down to it, people would never let little children starve. Buying presents off public money is abusing the system!
Awesome.