The first patient's case was settled in court. The judge ruled:
"Although his general capacity is impaired by schizophrenia, it has not been established that he does not sufficiently understand the nature, purpose and effects of the treatment he refuses. Indeed, I am satisfied that he has understood and retained the relevant treatment information, that in his own way he believes it, and that in the same fashion he has arrived at a clear choice."
The second case was a risk that we had to take because we'd didn't have time to go to court. Such is medicine that you are forever taking risks, but your job is to try and minimise those risks.