This discussion is now closed.

Check out other Related discussions

Doctor Who - Discussion Thread II

Maybe Amy was godmother or something? :dontknow:

Hmm, valid point
Why was the child taken by Silents? What the hell was their agenda(wasn't clear To me)
I think we will still see some of them- they might become more careful and hide after all, and not all
Humans would be armed when they see them? Seems too easy, getting rid of them like that
But I did think Prizoner Zero was related somehow to the Silence things :biggrin:

Reply 641

TheCrackInTime

3

Original post by cambo211

Yeah but telling me not to do something is like waving a red flag at a bull.

You obviously don't watch Mythbusters. :pierre:

Reply 642

sleekchic

18

"No it's not Apollo 11, that would be silly. It's Neil Armstrong's foot".

:mmm:

Reply 643

??????????????????

8

Original post by Aula

keep it that way :yy:

But, now I'm all curious. Now I'm torn.
=.=

Reply 644

Circadian_Rhythm

14

True love

Spoiler

Reply 645

alexanderrocks

how did amy get all that writing on her in the orphanage when she didnt even do it?

Reply 646

spacepirate-James

18

Original post by TheCrackInTime

You obviously don't watch Mythbusters. :pierre:

It's not the colour that matters, ammaright :teehee:

Reply 647

??????????????????

8

Original post by TulipFields

Hmm, valid point
Why was the child taken by Silents? What the hell was their agenda(wasn't clear To me)
I think we will still see some of them- they might become more careful and hide after all, and not all
Humans would be armed when they see them? Seems too easy, getting rid of them like that
But I did think Prizoner Zero was related somehow to the Silence things :biggrin:

They can remove a chip without any visual damage. Maybe they can extract babies.

Prisoner Zero was the Silence's pet snake.

Reply 648

sleekchic

18

Original post by ??????????????????

When I googled Madame Kovarian, I found nothing.
Must just be me.

All the answers you seek are on the ....

:h:

Reply 649

username91207

16

Original post by Aula

The problem with throwaway comments is that they are exactly that - throwaway, so it's difficult to tell which are and which aren't worth taking note of :moon:

I'm just trying to think of Amy's 'funny throwaway gags', but from memory all I can remember is:

Silent: You are Amelia Pond.
Amy: You are ugly, has anyone ever mentioned that?

THIS IS NOT THE EXACT QUOTE but it was something like that.

Think it could be this?

Reply 650

DoktaUH

11

Original post by alexanderrocks

how did amy get all that writing on her in the orphanage when she didnt even do it?

But she did do it.

Reply 651

Aula

18

Original post by DoktaUH

Or that a space suit arrives, shoots her with a green laser and she dies.

And inside that spacesuit is

Spoiler

Original post by TulipFields

Hmm, valid point
Why was the child taken by Silents? What the hell was their agenda(wasn't clear To me)

Wasn't clear to anyone except Moffat.
And Dokta, presumably.

I think we will still see some of them- they might become more careful and hide after all, and not all
Humans would be armed when they see them? Seems too easy, getting rid of them like that

Definitely too easy. It'll have reduced their numbers, and they'll have to be careful around humans, but they'll still be around
IIRC

Spoiler

Reply 652

username694843

12

Maybe a child born in a TARDIS has regenarative abilities... :sexface:

Reply 653

??????????????????

8

Original post by Circadian_Rhythm

True love

Spoiler

No rep left :frown:

Remind me if you want it.

Just heard a Pirates of the Carabean trailer on TV. Thought it was Dr who so quickly span around.

Disapont :frown:

Reply 654

Circadian_Rhythm

14

Amy shoots the space suit and misses.

River shoots the space suit and misses, and then says of course not.

She has had experience of bullets missing space suits perhaps? :pierre:

Reply 655

alexanderrocks

Original post by DoktaUH

But she did do it.

why didnt we see it?