What exactly is wrong with Communism?

...

However what I actually meant was a government which was led by robots same for defence forces so that oppression isn't human vs human hence unfair but human vs robot which means humans stay equal however below robots. In such case would we still be able to call it a hierarchy?

Ah, I see. That's an interesting idea.

I call it the Asimov hierarchy.

Er, no, this is a fact generally agreed by economists. It's in any economics textbook you can buy.

Textbooks written to support the capitalist system. ie. What role would an writer on economics have in a communist world with no economy so to speak. They are serving their own interest (as most people do in capitalism).

Both incorrect. In reality, all communism causes is for people to work without effort, because there's no incentive to. Everyone gets the same reward, all the time, regardless of their merit. It's in any economics textbook.

You're denying the fact that communism makes no economic sense.

Communism does not work. That is the only problem with it, otherwise it is a good idea.

The 3 reasons it does not work are this, first of all you have to assume everyone is equal. This is just not true. The only thing that Barack Obama and that crackwhore down the road have in common is the fact that they are both human. Some people are just better. People go on about equality but the plain fact remains, if others werent superior equality wouldnt be an issue. Some people are just better than you.

Secondly, if everyone is equal who will lead? The government cant have any power more than an ordinary person, so how could it work. If you place 1 person in charge its suddenly a dictatorship. If you place a government of elected officials in charge its democracy. Hypothetically if there was some magic AI computer that controlled everything it would still be a dictatorship because something is in charge.

And finally, if you destroyed currency and simply handed out resources equally(food, water, clothes etc), those resources would have value and become the new currency spawning capitalist behavour.

It does not work because humans arent equal. It can not work because of our egos. It can not work because you get a lot of people who dont want to be average. I definately wouldnt want to be just like everyone else. Boring as ****.

On paper communism works very well, it is an excellent system of government.

In practice it fails miserably as humans are not nice people.

That ebing said democracy isnt perfect either

Because communism is not truly about equality or freedom it cannot succeed. To force people into a position of "equality", requires influence from the top or outside, either legal, financial or physical force to push the people into such an unnatural state of living. A slave is not free or equal just because everyone else is a slave(and only has one master/oppressor instead of a whole class/caste of them).

If you force everybody to be equal, you have infringed on a fundamental FREEDOM of theirs.

It is not usually possible to force this upon people without major coersion, by definition those doing the coersion have a monopoly on violence and political power. Meaning the very idea of communism has been destroyed before it can even be effectively implemented.

Everything becomes about the "party" until they are basically the new upper-class, except usually with even more brutal and unfair legal and political practises than simply being richer than everyone else.

Equality of opportunity and personal+property with a small governement are the closest you can come, and even they evade true political fruition. Libertarian much better than communism when it comes to this, true freedom and equality is based on maximising the personal rights and freedoms of the individual.

...Libertarian much better than communism when it comes to this, true freedom and equality is based on maximising the personal rights and freedoms of the individual.

Libertarianism is just a defence of the freedom of those with money and/or private property. Those who have little or none of these things can just go starve as far as libertarianism is concerned.

The global communist revolution I am proposing would have to be entirely voluntary as any form of force would not create a sustainable system. I think one day people will choose equality out of free will and once that happens, communism will take over. therefore the change comes from within not above as you suggest.

Peace and harmony is the most natural way of living.

Slaves would not exist in communism. Masters would not exist. Those two only exist in contrast.

Emphasising the individual is not sustainable and the root of all problems.

Yes that is the nature of FREEDOM. Some would see it as a problem.

But even national socialism is better than communism. Lets be honest about that.

Freedom to starve isn't really worth much to the person starving, is it?

As far as Communism being a society in which everyone is treated equitably and has their basic needs met in a spirit of mutual support and cooperation, then I think it is easily preferable to National Socialism. On the other hand, the Nazis were, like Libertarians, only interested in the welfare of a select group.

And you don't need to SHOUT at me in capital letters either.

Freedom to starve isn't really worth much to the person starving, is it?

As far as Communism being a society in which everyone is treated equitably and has their basic needs met in a spirit of mutual support and cooperation, then I think it is easily preferable to National Socialism. On the other hand, the Nazis were, like Libertarians, only interested in the welfare of a select group.

And you don't need to SHOUT at me in capital letters either.

The faceless name of government owes you nothing except justice, Human charity and love used to be the foundation of caring. The only reason libertarianism would hit people hard in this age is because the system has already kept alive the dependants. Libertarianism prevents problems a lot easier than it can solve the ones already in existence.

Justice is for everyone, I'm not sure what your complaint is with justice and how it only serves a small portion of people, please highlight this small proportion of people who benefit from libertarianism? All dependants aside from the extremely unfortunate should have Guardians(read:family/community) who provide for them or else they shouldn't exist. No welfare babies thanks.

Yeah man, thats why the Germans converted hyperinflation and a destitute population into the best army in the world, Whilst the Soviets had Gulags and tonnes of flesh and blood to throw at their enemies.....

All the eccentricities of nazism aside, a nationalist version of socialism is the only form i find in the slightest viable.

Libertarianism is an ideology designed to maximise the advantages of those who have wealth, whether we're talking about money or land or whatever. That's it. It's a bare-faced lie to suggest that libertarians care about everyone's freedoms or liberties, they really, really don't. If freedom and liberty for all mattered to them libertarians would call for the abolition of private property, and which is in fact the forced monopolisation of portions of the earth by 'owners' to the exclusion, alienation and exploitation of all others. To be fair, left-libertarians do often call for the abolition of private property, but you're not one of those I'm confident enough.