There should be an awful lot of humble people on this site regarding Bush

Nobody's ever said it doesn't work. That's the absolute least of the arguments against it.

To the drug addled left waterboarding a terrorist to get information out of him is barbaric and it violates our core beliefs. While putting a couple of bullets through his face and eyes and then throw him into the sea as fish food isn't barbaric. Do i have that right? democratic bombs good, republican bombs bad. phonies and frauds through and through.

And Obama should finally grow a spine and apologise to Dick Cheney.

To the drug addled left waterboarding a terrorist to get information out of him is barbaric and it violates our core beliefs. While putting a couple of bullets through his face and eyes and then throw him into the sea as fish food isn't barbaric.

He was buried at sea because of the Islamic belief that graves shouldn't become shrines. Republican bombs were dropped on Iraq, a country they claimes, quite clearly fraudulantly, to have "WMDs". Oh, and I think you'll find that Bush always thought Osama was in Afghanistan, Obama always said he was probably in Pakistan. And I wouldn't believe everything you believe in the Daily Mail. And torture is barbaric.

Not drug addled - but they're both wrong.
Let's assume torture works - ends still don't justify the means. It's not possible to state that 'my country is morally right, and these people are morally wrong' if you commit the same or similar crimes. You lose any legitimacy.

Anyway, do we know that they found Osama using torture? Genuine question.

Do you really think it was done because of respect for Islam?How trusting you are of the BBC or the Guardian or whatever it is you read. And I wouldn't be so trusting of what Obama thinks or believes,when he backtracked on his plans to close Gitmo and wussed out on prosecuting those in the Bush admin who sorted out the 'enhanced interogation techniques'. He is becoming as republican as possible because he has an election to win in 2012.

War is barbaric but the left seem okay with when it is a democrat president okaying the barbarism , flying planes into buildings is barbaric. Suicide bombings are barbaric. When you want to beat an enemy such as the islamists, who will go to any lengths to beat us, sometimes you have to do what would be in peacetime quite objectionable things.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1382893/Osama-Bin-Laden-dead-Guantanamo-detainees-led-CIA-Abbottabad-hideout.html

Not just Bush,but the likes of rumsfield and cheny,condy rice etc etc. Lots of people here dribble on about Torture not working and how nasty gitmo and what goes on there and in other countries on US orders but right now some of you need to admit you were wrong.

Don't be despondent, Obama himself was a dribbler and handwringer on Gitmo,the CIA and torture, but even he isn't stupid enough to shut the place down or place criminal charges against those in the Bush admin that authorised the advanced techniques to make those terrorist goat fukers talk. Indeed Gitmo is thriving, it won't be shut down and if there is a need I have no doubt Obama would authorise it, perhaps worse if the need arose. Because ladies and gentlemen we are at war . And it isn't a question of being morally above your enemy ,when it comes down to it it is about winning and doing what needs to be done.

Of course torture works, why have they been using it since time and memorial? And by people far more intelligent that liberal talking heads,or the occasional 'former military officer ',who they drag out to give a bit of credence to their idiocy.

The key when using it, isn't so much the torture itself all sorts of techniques can be used depending on how long you have to extract the info. But having experts in human intelligence to sift through the extracted info to get a reliable intelligence picture and also enter trick questions within the questioning that you already know the answers too.So when you for instance electrocute his testicles and he answers this question correctly you know ,he knows something. And it can be stepped up and other questions can be asked.

So lets have no more of this nonsense of torture not working.There is a moral argument, which Iam prepared to listen too,but pleace do not talk such studidity.And before a chimp rants about the Daily Mail there are numerous other news outlets on this and ironically the Mail is rather left wing regarding US politics, quite an Obama supporter is the Mail like the rest of the British media.

What other reason could there possiblt be? I'm sure you would rather his body was paraded around America so rednecks could shoot at him. Showing a horrendous level of ignorance by simply calling them "islamists". Our moral onduct is what should separate our supposedly great democracies from people such as terrorists.

So I expect whenever a westerner is kidnapped, tortured and murdered by the Taliban or Al Qaeda you have absolutely no problems with that? All fair game in your opinion?

Didn't they do that before Bin Laden was killed??

What his death does, is show mass murderers and psychopaths around the world,who shelter under the umbrella of Islam who bad mouth the US and the UK, who plot terror against our nations that the United states at least will go after them and they can never be safe.

And bin laden was the type of person who sends deluded people to their deaths, he himself valued his life as evidenced by hiding behind a womans skirts using her as a human shield. He knew fear in his last moments,if he fears his subordinates will too. Who also send deluded people to their deaths with explosives strapped to them.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1382893/Osama-Bin-Laden-dead-Guantanamo-detainees-led-CIA-Abbottabad-hideout.html

Not just Bush,but the likes of rumsfield and cheny,condy rice etc etc. Lots of people here dribble on about Torture not working and how nasty gitmo and what goes on there and in other countries on US orders but right now some of you need to admit you were wrong.