I could deal with a paper where me failing to get the marks is due to me failing to recall something from the syllabus, but when the questions are based on **** pulled from wikipedia because the examiner who wrote the paper got **** faced the night before he had to submit his un-started, first, last and final draft of the paper, and 45 marks of the paper are based on 4 sentences from the book which don't even help you much if you remember then I think I am justified in getting pissed.