Original post by im no supermanCan anyone mark this BMAT essay type question for me please? i know it's not perfect or good, but i want to improve, the title is :
Stop moaning! The pain is there to help you!
What does the above statement imply? Give examples that illustrate how pain can be benificial and others that illustrate the opposite. How can you explain the differences in the function of pain?Pain, as the statement implies, is present solely to provide benefit to someone – whatever that help may be. Clearly The statement generalises that all types of pain are of good effect and that in all cases, it works to help. (This last line has awkward wording, and is a repetition of the first; put "generalise" in the first line and scrap the rest)
The assumption made by the statement ignores the fact that pain is not always beneficial, and we know today that pain can exist in many kinds and forms. For one, pain can be beneficial though it can always equally be unbeneficial (unbeneficial is arguably not a word; there is a repetition problem, in the first line of this paragraph you imply that pain can also be disadvantageous, so there is no need to repeat that in explicit terms). Pain also exists in different forms, ranging from emotional pain, and to physical pain, which are two distinct types of pain (repetition of "different forms") which may be linked, but are separate. (This is a generalised statement on pain, rather than a statement addressed to the question; relate it to the question)
As a result (as a result of what? what you mention next is not a consequence of the existence of emotional and physical pain) , pain can have advantageous, disadvantageous, or both depending on what view you look at it (Pretty much what you said in the previous paragraphs). For example (an example of the previous statement would be a situation in which pain is both advantageous and disadvantageous, like you have outlined below, so save this for your example), evolution states that from evolution we can infer that an organism has a natural mechanism by which they can survive and to pass on their genes; namely, avoiding sensitivity to harmful stimuli. As a result For example, touching a fire with your hand (be specific) will obviously cause pain. However (use however when you're showing the other side of the argument, like you have done below; putting it right after an example does not much sense)This pain will hurt considerably so it would be simple to state the pain is a disadvantage and is no help whatsoever. However, without that pain to alert, it logically follows that skin and tissue will be burnt, incapacitating the person and causing further needless pain (ie. ask yourself why being burnt is bad) Thus, in order to protect an organism pain can act as a useful mechanism though it can be seen in two different lights.
However (Join this to your previous paragraph, eg. "This second light in which pain can be viewed") There are times where (when?) pain produces no real benefit. For example, if someone faces strong emotional pain due to mental health issues, Alzheimer’s which is known to cause great emotional stress, and other such scenarios (I know what you mean, but it doesn't make grammatical sense). Are there any benefits to which we can assume that for the greater good, there is a temporary ‘pain’ to enable a longer term benefit like I demonstrated in the last example (or, "Are there any benefits to the pain caused by Alzheimer's"; I struggled making sense of your last sentence). Clearly, in these cases a patient with Alzheimer’s will not have nay benefit and may only suffer emotional and mental stress and pain. In this case, the title statement is disproved on the account that no benefit is extracted from the pain.
As a result of the different kinds of pain, and the effects they produce, we can not deem that all pain is useful. However, what we can assume is that some pain can be of benefit to the survival of an organism, whilst other pain can be fairly degrading (sidetracking to a different topic; not relevant) of no use. Though, like the beneficial (or pain beneficial to survival, if you want to include the evolutionary aspect) evolutionary pain, it initially causes distress, but we see there is a benefit which is long term in the interest in the survival of the organism. (Doesn't make grammatical sense; you seem to have been talking from one angle at the beginning and another at the end; revise)