The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Original post by crazylemon
But then you have to cut something else, the country is running at an unsustainable level of deficit. You can't look in isolation at this sort of thing. Plus I am not sure why medicine should be a special case other that the job security.

I come from a priveldged background myself so can't really talk and I suspect I probably worsen the issue. I am all for more acess schemes and going by the fact they are hugely oversubscribed (so there is demand) I would say that just widening them (and shrinking. Normal places) would be the way to go for now.

I think trying to get the US culture of pays icing back to you alma mater is the way to go to fund additional scholarships (not that our uni is doing well seeig as it came 164 out of 167 in feedback in the NSs I believe lol)


No, because both the banking tax and the fuel duty is new money...
I think because I managed with basically zilch help through school - I have a rather dim view on these things, as I think with the way things are if you're clever enough you can manage it. There's already a very reasonable income-assessed loan (up to 5k in london) and bursary given out (2.5k from student finance, which is often topped up by unis by another 2.5k), and then fees can be paid back as normal like anyone else - I don't see the problem.

I went to a meh comprehensive and managed so why can't anyone else... I'm sure you have some very valid points Sarky so if you want to give us your 2ps worth...
Reply 6842
I managed with no help from my parents as well but I feel a big thing was I knew they were there/could support me to a certain extent IF the **** hit the fan. That makes a huge difference. I was never going to have to drop out because I couldn't fine rent etc.

Also, taking on massive debt when you don't even know if you would pass the course is a big ask.
Original post by *tink*
I managed with no help from my parents as well but I feel a big thing was I knew they were there/could support me to a certain extent IF the **** hit the fan. That makes a huge difference. I was never going to have to drop out because I couldn't fine rent etc.

Also, taking on massive debt when you don't even know if you would pass the course is a big ask.


Well not really - we all go in expecting to pass and most of us do.

And it's win-win - if you really don't pass you won't have to repay it anyway until you're earning a certain amount, and if you do you're earning so you can pay it.
Reply 6844
Original post by Wangers
Genuinely, what do you think the issues are?


I don't really have an answer for that, but I do recognise the nuances of the issue. It's everything that leads up to an individual choosing another course over medicine, not getting the grades, not being prepared for work experience and interviews and everything else that might support an application. Behind each of those elements are a huge range of factors, many of which will be greatly affected by background and upbringing.

But like I said, I don't really know, especially without researching it more.
Hi, does anyone know any good immunology websites? Not so much the infection and types of pathogens etc - just the physiology of the immune system?
Original post by crazylemon
But what you need is to give the details of how it is paid back and make that clear.
Yes the total debt might be 100k but explain that once you graduate you will only be paying £x a month they seem to get it (or did when I explained it...) plus that it comes out as a tax and so you never ever have to worry about not being able to afford to pay it back that you don't
Maybe thinking that education on how it works is all that is needed (wrt this as a barrier) is naive but I have seen it work.


I do find it bizzare that the government rejected the idea of a graduate tax before effectively implementing one in all but name. Had they implemented an explicitly named graduate tax it would have avoided a lot of the student unrest and accusations of breaking promises - the lib dems could even claim they'd abolished up-front student fees.
Original post by Captain Crash
I do find it bizzare that the government rejected the idea of a graduate tax before effectively implementing one in all but name. Had they implemented an explicitly named graduate tax it would have avoided a lot of the student unrest and accusations of breaking promises - the lib dems could even claim they'd abolished up-front student fees.


A tax would be applied uniformly to all grads though, surely? This at least takes into account how much you borrowed.
Original post by Philosoraptor
I think because I managed with basically zilch help through school - I have a rather dim view on these things, as I think with the way things are if you're clever enough you can manage it. There's already a very reasonable income-assessed loan (up to 5k in london) and bursary given out (2.5k from student finance, which is often topped up by unis by another 2.5k), and then fees can be paid back as normal like anyone else - I don't see the problem.

I went to a meh comprehensive and managed so why can't anyone else... I'm sure you have some very valid points Sarky so if you want to give us your 2ps worth...


Yeah, I'm with you man.

I went to a meh comp and I seem to be doing fine. I'm of the opinion of that anybody can do it. With the amount of burseries etc available at the moment I really don't think anything else is necessary.

If anything the way the loan is done pisses me off. Why should you only have to pay back 70% (or whatever %) of your loan and me 100% despite the fact that we are both leaving with the same degree?

Give them access to more 0% interest loans, sure. Not having to pay half of it back despite the fact it's 0% interest and you pay back tiny amounts per month? Wtf? If anybody was deterred off medicine by the amount of 'debt', I put debt in inverted commas because it's essentially the nicest 'debt' you'll ever have, they deserve a slap in the face.
Original post by Becca-Sarah
A tax would be applied uniformly to all grads though, surely? This at least takes into account how much you borrowed.



Original post by crazylemon
This punishes the wealthy far less than a tax. Not that I am impressed with the new system either.


These points may be true for the general graduate tax, but the current is essentially a graduate tax. If they slapped a name of a tax on it, I imagine it would have gone down a lot better.
Original post by RollerBall
Yeah, I'm with you man.

I went to a meh comp and I seem to be doing fine. I'm of the opinion of that anybody can do it. With the amount of burseries etc available at the moment I really don't think anything else is necessary.

If anything the way the loan is done pisses me off. Why should you only have to pay back 70% (or whatever %) of your loan and me 100% despite the fact that we are both leaving with the same degree?

Give them access to more 0% interest loans, sure. Not having to pay half of it back despite the fact it's 0% interest and you pay back tiny amounts per month? Wtf? If anybody was deterred off medicine by the amount of 'debt', I put debt in inverted commas because it's essentially the nicest 'debt' you'll ever have, they deserve a slap in the face.


I do think though that everyone should be allowed in principle to apply for the same amount of maximum loans - so sod the london topup, and the parental assessed topup, every student should be able to apply for the same amount regardless of parental income - the whole independence thing has to go all the way. Then, if parents choose to help, that's their choice. You can then have extra bursaries available - but I think alot of people would benefit from this.
Original post by Captain Crash
I do find it bizzare that the government rejected the idea of a graduate tax before effectively implementing one in all but name. Had they implemented an explicitly named graduate tax it would have avoided a lot of the student unrest and accusations of breaking promises - the lib dems could even claim they'd abolished up-front student fees.


The fear with the graduate tax is that it would just disappear into the wide blue yonder, whereas at least now, all monies are recycled through the SLC. Then again the government is reportedly considering selling off the loanbook...If you do not earn over 21K after your degree, it has to be said, - what additional skills has that degree bought you? And indeed - potentially if you are doing a job not necessitating a degree - then has the taxpayer investment been wasted?
Original post by Wangers
The fear with the graduate tax is that it would just disappear into the wide blue yonder, whereas at least now, all monies are recycled through the SLC. Then again the government is reportedly considering selling off the loanbook...If you do not earn over 21K after your degree, it has to be said, - what additional skills has that degree bought you? And indeed - potentially if you are doing a job not necessitating a degree - then has the taxpayer investment been wasted?


Regarding your last point - kind of, but that's Labours fault for pushing far too many people into unnecessary degrees and devaluing the status of a graduate. I think it's great that apprenticeships and other alternatives to uni are being pushed again, and hopefully the fee change will make more people consider whether university is actually necessary for what they want to do right now. I agree that (in the long term, ignoring the immediate jobs most grads are forced to do to pay the rent) if you aren't earning over £21k then your degree probably wasn't worth taking, career wise. But a lot of people want the experience, or to simply prove to themselves that they could do it - a friend of mine has a history degree and is now doing an NVQ to be a teaching assistant, but that doesn't mean her degree is worthless because she has more confidence in her own ability and intelligence now, that she wouldn't have had if she'd gone straight to NVQ after school.
Will I ever look down a microscope and know what I'm looking at? :cry:
Original post by colabottles
Will I ever look down a microscope and know what I'm looking at? :cry:


No, but you'll get better at blagging it.
Original post by Fission_Mailed

Original post by Fission_Mailed
No, but you'll get better at blagging it.


I'm okay if it's a blood film, but if it's tissue samples then I don't have a clue :sad:
Original post by colabottles
Will I ever look down a microscope and know what I'm looking at? :cry:

I wouldn't be optimistic. But shotgun histology on youtube is a reasonable way of getting better at it.
Original post by Kinkerz
I wouldn't be optimistic. But shotgun histology on youtube is a reasonable way of getting better at it.


Ahh just watched the introduction, that sounds great! Thank you :biggrin:
Original post by colabottles
Ahh just watched the introduction, that sounds great! Thank you :biggrin:

http://www.medicalschoolpathology.com/HistopathologyWMVs/
He has a histopathology website too. It's basically the morphology sections from Robbins and Cotran just didactically delivered with a slide.
Reply 6859
just found out that in order to get a first, I now need to average 74% in my bsc... I can kiss that thought goodbye :frown:

Latest

Trending

Trending