No, and it certainly should not happen here either.
Besides, I'm sure this type of material is still illegal, I'm guessing they have clarified the definition of what consists of 'making'.
The the guy on the street, 'making' would mean taking pictures with an imaging device, and thats what the jury and the people reading the papers imagine about people charged with 'making' indecent images.
To the prosecution, 'making' means accessing, so that in statute, when you access these images, you are 'making' indecent images when a copy of the image is 'made' in your cache or on your hard disk.