Teh Super Awesome Juicy CURRENT YEAR 11 (2012-13) THREAD; MARK I

Scroll to see replies

No, I'm saying that IF gravitrons, for which there is no evidence other than the existence of other force carriers, there would probably be an anti-gravitron. However think about it I made a mistake - the anti-gravitron would behave in the exact same manner as a regular gravitron, I think :colondollar:

Don't hold me to any of this; I know anti-particles exist for everything up to protons, neutrons and electrons; I don't know if there are anti-quarks or anti-gluons, -mions, -pions, etc. :tongue:

I think there is, I remember reading it somewhere possibly.

There are

I know that... But know nothing about them :smile:

Reply 3521

techno836

Original post by shadab786ahmed

Darn! Let me believe I'm special :frown:

And he so fancies her xD

haha yes i was joiking dont worry i do know my grammar .. well at least to standard :L

and woah :hand:

where has this come from ????

Reply 3522

L'Evil Fish

Original post by MangoFreak

Sorry

There you go :awesome:

Brb... Let me go on the browser to check and rep you..

Teach me about particles :biggrin:

Reply 3523

MangoFreak

Anti-gravity would really be gravity's force carrier moving AWAY from mass, surely? :biggrin:

I'm sure we're not the first to propose the concept of anti-gravity :lol:

Reply 3524

L'Evil Fish

Original post by MangoFreak

Anti-gravity would really be gravity's force carrier moving AWAY from mass, surely? :biggrin:

I'm sure we're not the first to propose the concept of anti-gravity :lol:

Shut up! I am I tell you! I am! :frown:

lol, okay... Has anyone proposed that something physically massless... Isn't affected by a black hole and so can be used for data transmission?

Reply 3525

MangoFreak

I refuse to believe the word impossible to ring true ever in science. Something that is impossible is merely something we haven't found a way around yet :smug:

Reply 3526

L'Evil Fish

'_'

didn't you detect the sarcasm :tongue:

directed to mango?

Reply 3527

MangoFreak

Original post by shadab786ahmed

Shut up! I am I tell you! I am! :frown:

lol, okay... Has anyone proposed that something physically massless... Isn't affected by a black hole and so can be used for data transmission?

Well, photons have no mass... :tongue:

Reply 3528

L'Evil Fish

Yeah, you guys carry on... I'm way out of my league... :getmecoat:

btw I've discovered something faster than light and faster than a muon..

Reply 3529

L'Evil Fish

Original post by MangoFreak

Well, photons have no mass... :tongue:

No mass, or virtually no mass?

Reply 3530

MangoFreak

Original post by shadab786ahmed

'_'

didn't you detect the sarcasm :tongue:

directed to mango?

I wouldn't have guessed you were being sarcastic if you hadn't used the word "this" before the word "antimatter" :lol:

You can't "detect" sarcasm through text :tongue:

Reply 3531

MangoFreak

Original post by shadab786ahmed

No mass, or virtually no mass?

No mass. Electrons have negligible mass :h:

Reply 3532

L'Evil Fish

Original post by MangoFreak

I wouldn't have guessed you were being sarcastic if you hadn't used the word "this" before the word "antimatter" :lol:

You can't "detect" sarcasm through text :tongue:

That was placed purposefully and yeah you can, watch...

This is sarcasm, it's so undetectable...

:colonhash:

Reply 3533

techno836

im off now anyway people .. night :smile:

Reply 3534

MangoFreak

Allow me to fix this. Atoms are particles :tongue:

Particles are just anything that makes up a "part" :wink:

of something :awesome:

It's actually a pretty hard thing to define, so WIKIPEDIA! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle

Reply 3535

L'Evil Fish

I know all that up until string...? I've heard of it... And keep hearing about it, but never read upon it...

Original post by MangoFreak

No mass. Electrons have negligible mass :h:

How does it not have mass? Does it not have a surface at all?

Reply 3536

MangoFreak

Original post by shadab786ahmed

That was placed purposefully and yeah you can, watch...

This is sarcasm, it's so undetectable...

:colonhash:

Well yeah I know it was deliberately placed.

And that's not detection of sarcasm; it's easily seen that it's sarcastic through use of the world "so" :lol:

Don't mess with me, I'm a linguist :ahee:

Reply 3537

L'Evil Fish

Original post by techno836

im off now anyway people .. night :smile:

Night mate :wink:

have sweet dreams about Carys :wink:

Reply 3538

MangoFreak

Original post by shadab786ahmed

I know all that up until string...? I've heard of it... And keep hearing about it, but never read upon it...

How does it not have mass? Does it not have a surface at all?

Just think of it as a self-sustaining point of energy :tongue:

String theory is way beyond myself :lol:

Reply 3539

L'Evil Fish

Original post by MangoFreak

Well yeah I know it was deliberately placed.

And that's not detection of sarcasm; it's easily seen that it's sarcastic through use of the world "so" :lol: