Do you consider this body attractive?

Ok do you think this is a nicer body?



(this is not me btw)

22

No...

It's too over the top. I like muscles generally but not like that. I don't like it when every single hair is waxed off either.

I wax my hair. It make me look nicer when im topless. Really don't see why some women like hair.

Hair looks more masculine.

You're confusing social gender constructs with the word natural. That isn't true at all. If men were meant to be naturally muscular you wouldn't have to work out, no man has ever looked like the OP without training the body. That is more siding with unnatural as you have to work so hard to achieve it.

The guys who put so much emphasis on bodies always leave their faces out, I wonder why. To me it is unattractive, it screams vanity and insecurity.

A guys face matters way more than his body. A guy with a better face can get a million times the attention then a ugly guy who works out and is whole topic of conversation considers of "sick delts brah".

I like both these guys, one is muscular, one isn't, BOTH have nice faces.



Also notice in the wwe how it is the least muscular guys who all the girls like, such as Cody Rhodes, cm punk etc are all consider way more attractive than John Cena. The girls like muscles myth is so silly.

Minus the silicone tits

Yeah girls are scared to lift heavy where in reality they need to get toned

I don't think you're reading the same thread as me then.

Btw, I hope you know when I say the posts call him "disgusting" you shouldn't take it literally right? There are other ways to insult someone without using that word. Words like "ew/yuck/gross/unhuman" are included. And I can bet for the life of me I've read way more than 1 insulting reply in this thread.

But hey, I probably sound like a moaning bitch now, I seriously need to get over this..

Plenty of men are muscular without working out

At any rate, men are expected to be more muscular than women but it's also natural that we are,

so I wouldn't really call it a gender construct.

Ok do you think this is a nicer body?



(this is not me btw)

I saw this question posted on another site and I'm curious to see what people on here think, so I've pasted the original question below.

"Hi there, I want to sort out the arguments a lot of people seem to have about muscular bodies and female attraction to it. So I thought "Where could I get better answers than here?". I really hope you can help me making a little poll. Do you consider this kind of body attractive?

http://i.imgur.com/XrD8g.png

To make it easy to collect the answers please reply with the following form:

Age:

Do you like this body?:

If no, why not?

What is the dreambody a man could have?(Picture)"

Show me one man who has never trained who is muscular. This idea that men are naturally blessed with muscles is laughable.



But how is it natural when you have to TRAIN your body? You have to modify it, no one is born like the OP.


That men are naturally muscley and women if women muscley that's unnatural? Yes that is a gender construct. If both work out, both can be muscley, as stated men aren't born with a body like the one in the OP.

It's really not, any profession which requires hard manual labour will be muscular.

Obviously someone who sits on their ass all day is less likely to be than someone who trains

the point is that naturally men are more muscular and we gain muscle easier

That's my point, if you take average men and average women who don't work out the men will be stronger than the women generally.

Muscle building is a natural process? How is it unnatural, your body is reacting to stimulus, it would be possible for him to get that big without specialized equipment, it's just that it would be harder. What that stimulus is doesn't really make it less natural.

As I stated and backed up with a study, it's not a gender construct, men are naturally more physically endowned. Which is why the male weightlifting records are significantly higher than female ones and why men are generally stronger than women.

That's still exercise, you won't look like the OP through manual labour, that guy focuses on specific parts of his body as well as keeping his body fat low through diet.


Likely? No definitely. I ask again show me a muscley man who doesn't get it through working out? You can't, duh.



No they aren't naturally muscular though, you have to work out, no one is born muscular without working out. You said:



Supposed by who? Society. It isn't nature that men are muscular, it because they work out. So how can you then say it isn't natural for women to be muscular? When it is due to hard work not nature.



That doesn't mean men naturally are muscular and women aren't, a fat man could probably over power a muscular woman.



Everything that occurs in change is natural, I don't think you understand the word. I'm saying it is not the natural state of a human being, you have to target specific parts of your body to modify it.




That men are supposed to be muscular and women aren't? Yes that is a social/gender construct. A skinny guy can be stronger than a woman, this isn't about strength I'm talking about muscular build of which requires hard work from both genders. The fact that women don't build as much muscle doesn't make it unnatural or mean they aren't supposed to be muscular. If biology didn't want them to be muscular they wouldn't have that ability which they evidently do. There's nothing unnatural about it.

You're confusing social gender constructs with the word natural. That isn't true at all. If men were meant to be naturally muscular you wouldn't have to work out, no man has ever looked like the OP without training the body. That is more siding with unnatural as you have to work so hard to achieve it.

Also notice in the wwe how it is the least muscular guys who all the girls like, such as Cody Rhodes, cm punk etc are all consider way more attractive than John Cena. The girls like muscles myth is so silly.