The Describe The Person Above You Generation IX

Original post by The Epicurean

Look again :hand:

I hop you get your eyes sorted soon :bunny2:

I'll get you off this time :grumble:

Reply 4361

Original post by The Mad Dog

How the holy heck? (is my style of writing that obvious).

:hurt:

No I had a hunch. I would have said TH or Zed but to my knowledge, they aren't fans of The Smiths, that crossed them out. Next up were Rosa and Ranbow, they wouldn't do such a thing. Next up was fishy and you, I noticed though that you were offline, I knew straight away it would be you. :holmes:

Reply 4362

The Epicurean

Original post by ranbow99

I'll get you off this time :grumble:

I hop you realise how wrong that sounds :bunny2:

Ah, it was you. Thanks breh :h:

I just keep getting anonymous personal reps recently and it is driving me mental :lol:

Reply 4363

Original post by ipoop

Damn shouldn't of shut the tab with this account logged in...

if it wasn't for you meddling kids.

Although I still want to know who did the MJ account.

Reply 4364

Original post by The Mad Dog

Damn shouldn't of shut the tab with this account logged in...

if it wasn't for you meddling kids.

Although I still want to know who did the MJ account.

I guess those crime novels do have a use in life after all. :mmm:

Reply 4365

Original post by ipoop

I guess those crime novels do have a use in life after all. :mmm:

The post count on generation X is going to look a bit weird with The Smiths 3 and Michael_Jackson 1

Reply 4366

Original post by The Mad Dog

The post count on generation X is going to look a bit weird with The Smiths 3 and Michael_Jackson 1

Well last thread had Jesus Christ 69. :mmm:

Anything is possible. :rofl:

Oh and MJ is TH. :holmes:

Reply 4367

Original post by The Epicurean

I hop you realise how wrong that sounds :bunny2:

OMG!! I meant to type 'let' :rofl:

Reply 4368

L'Evil Fish

I'll make a troll account soon :smile:

Reply 4369

Twas me.

I also repped Mad Dog below you. :bigsmile:

Reply 4370

I just repped you :h:

Reply 4371

The Epicurean

Original post by ranbow99

OMG!! I meant to type 'let' :rofl:

Lol

That was quite a slip up :teehee:

I didn't think you want to be 'getting me off' :toofunny:

I'm not sure who I repped tbh :s-smilie:

I only know who I neg repped >_<

Reply 4372

Original post by ipoop

What makes you think I wouldn't do such a thing? :holmes:

Reply 4373

L'Evil Fish

Original post by The Epicurean

Lol

That was quite a slip up :teehee:

I didn't think you want to be 'getting me off' :toofunny:

I'm not sure who I repped tbh :s-smilie:

I only know who I neg repped >_<

And we all joined in :h:

Reply 4374

Original post by ranbow99

What makes you think I wouldn't do such a thing? :holmes:

With time, you could have thought of the MJ account but you wouldn't carry on with the joke and create a second account. :holmes:

And I don't think you listen to The Smiths. :holmes:

You like to keep fresh and you get tired/bored easily by repetition. :beard:

(edited 11 years ago)

Reply 4375

Original post by ipoop

With time, you could have thought of the MJ account but you wouldn't carry on with the joke and create a second account. :holmes:

And I don't think you listen to The Smiths. :holmes:

You like to keep fresh and you get tired/bored easily by repetition. :beard:

Could the last psychologist to leave this thread lock me in for their next experiment.

Reply 4376

Original post by The Mad Dog

Could the last psychologist to leave this thread lock me in for their next experiment.

Could you rephrase? I'm not able to make sense of that sentence. :sad:

Reply 4377

Original post by ipoop

Could you rephrase? I'm not able to make sense of that sentence. :sad:

Really, does somebody who won't be done for being unnecessarily harsh on him mind explaining it to poor ipoop?

Reply 4378