Why are Muslim's portrayed as terrorist's in today's society?

if you want to do some "destroying" why don't you join
the "jihad "

Where is suicide bombing condoned in Islam?

Where is execution condoned for rape victims in Islam?





Posted from TSR Mobile

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/07/video-rape-victim-executed-under-the-sharia-in-afghanistan.html

http://old.richarddawkins.net/articles/3287-somalia-rape-victim-executed


But let's add: your definition prohibits it. Others it doesn't. Whether you claim bombers are muslim or not, they perceive themselves as such. Imams in this country preach violence against the UK.

Other religions don't do this. I have no respect for the 'philosophy' of a religion like Islam - the Qu'ran reads like the ramblings of a madman, which is exactly what Mohammad (who had sex with a 9 year old remember) was.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/07/video-rape-victim-executed-under-the-sharia-in-afghanistan.html

http://old.richarddawkins.net/articles/3287-somalia-rape-victim-executed


But let's add: your definition prohibits it. Others it doesn't. Whether you claim bombers are muslim or not, they perceive themselves as such. Imams in this country preach violence against the UK.

Other religions don't do this. I have no respect for the 'philosophy' of a religion like Islam - the Qu'ran reads like the ramblings of a madman, which is exactly what Mohammad (who had sex with a 9 year old remember) was.

I don't care what people do, I specifically asked you where in Islam is suicide bombing and executing rape victims condoned, Not where it has been done.

Posted from TSR Mobile

So your defense is that every where it has not been done is not a muslim country. There can't be that many muslims in the world then.

I agree with you. 9/11 started it all mainly.
Let me give you an example: 'American terrorists hijack planes and crash them into the twin towers in Dubai, the United Arab Emirates is invading Canada to capture the terrorists'.
Does this make sense? No. It was said that the so called 'terrorists' were identified as Saudi Arabian yet Afghanistan and Iraq were invaded.
Around 3000 people died, right? Everyone is saddened by that but no one looks at the millions of Muslims innocent who have died and are still drying to this 'war on terror' which is not what it is being portrayed to be. Read this: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/06/15/osama-bin-laden-the-innocent-man-closing-the-case/

An no, I already knew about 9/11 being an inside job before reading that.

To people with an open mind (mainly), I know that the media is our main source of news but at least try looking into it from a different perspective. For example, Try RussiaToday instead of CNN or Presstv.ir instead BBC. Keep a balanced outlook, although I mainly go on CNN, Fox News etc for a good laugh.

The other thing is that the Middle East and Africa are very resourceful. Gold, diamonds, oil, heroine, you name it.
Remember how Col Gaddafi was killed? He was trying to unite all African/Muslim countries and asking them to trade in Gold instead of US petro dollars and the countries seemed keen on it. Next thing you know, there are rebels trying to take him down. Really, if you actually look into what this man has done for his people and what he was planning to do, you will see the injustice and cruelty. Now Libya is a real dump!
Same goes for Assad, US funded rebels are trying to take him down when the Syrian people support him! The Western media only shows you the rebels (portrayed as citizens fighting against Assad, I believe).
Likewise, Iran is being constantly pestered with sanctions which is harming their trading and causing adverse effect on the people! A lack of medicine for patients is one thing these sanctions have caused. All due to false allegations against their peaceful nuclear energy program.
The Taliban in Afghanistan are fighting against the invading soldiers to protect their people and land. Wouldn't you do the same?
BUT it's not just Western countries either. Countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Bahrain are also evil for siding with the US. Have you ever noticed how there is hardly anything bad about these countries in the news? Or hardly anything 'war' type going on?

Who's the real terrorist?

Here's a list of the hijackers and their origins:
1) Satam al-suqami,
- Saudi origins,
- travelled to Afghanistan where he was recruited into al-qaeda
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satam_al-Suqami
2) Waleed al-Shehri
- Saudi origins
- went to afghanistan through the army
- was recruited to alqaeda in Afghanistan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waleed_al-Shehri
3) Wail al-Shehri
- Waleed's brother (2nd terrorist on the list)
- Saudi origins
- Travelled to Afghanistan
- was recruited to al-qaeda in Afghanistan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wail_al-Shehri
4) Al-Omari
- Saudi origins
- not everything is known about his identity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdulaziz_al-Omari
5) Mohammad Atta
- Egyptian origins
- spent some time in afghanistan where he met Osama bin laden and other members of al-qaeda
- hijacked a plane
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamed_Atta
6) Majed Moqed
- saudi origins
- joined al-qaeda in afghanistan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majed_Moqed
7) Khalid al-Mihdhar
- Saudi origins
- travelled to afghanistan and was recruited by osama bin laden to hijack one of the planes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_al-Mihdhar


Eh I'm too tired to write the rest of them off but you get the point. Although most of the terrorists were saudi in origin, they were all recruited to alqaeda in afghanistan. So America didn't REALLY invade the wrong country... unless you suggest that people should always be judged based on ethnicity, in which case the only countries to ever be invaded should be in Africa.

How do you come to that conclusion?

Are you incapable of answering two simple questions?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Here's a list of the hijackers and their origins:
1) Satam al-suqami,
- Saudi origins,
- travelled to Afghanistan where he was recruited into al-qaeda
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satam_al-Suqami
2) Waleed al-Shehri
- Saudi origins
- went to afghanistan through the army
- was recruited to alqaeda in Afghanistan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waleed_al-Shehri
3) Wail al-Shehri
- Waleed's brother (2nd terrorist on the list)
- Saudi origins
- Travelled to Afghanistan
- was recruited to al-qaeda in Afghanistan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wail_al-Shehri
4) Al-Omari
- Saudi origins
- not everything is known about his identity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdulaziz_al-Omari
5) Mohammad Atta
- Egyptian origins
- spent some time in afghanistan where he met Osama bin laden and other members of al-qaeda
- hijacked a plane
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamed_Atta
6) Majed Moqed
- saudi origins
- joined al-qaeda in afghanistan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majed_Moqed
7) Khalid al-Mihdhar
- Saudi origins
- travelled to afghanistan and was recruited by osama bin laden to hijack one of the planes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_al-Mihdhar


Eh I'm too tired to write the rest of them off but you get the point. Although most of the terrorists were saudi in origin, they were all recruited to alqaeda in afghanistan. So America didn't REALLY invade the wrong country... unless you suggest that people should always be judged based on ethnicity, in which case the only countries to ever be invaded should be in Africa.

I'm not prepared to play games with you in face of that fact that people calling themselves muslim are waging war across africa, asia. Importing their tribal mentalities into the West.

If you want to play a game via sola scriptura that is your problem. Like all those who operate sola scriptura, however you rapidly find that reality is different.

I'll try once more.

Where in Islam is executing rape victims condoned?

Where in Islam is suicide bombing condoned?


Two very simple questions, Needing two very simple answers.

Posted from TSR Mobile

If man was required to wear exactly the same clothes then it would be less offensive-it seems woman have to pay for the weakness of man-god created us and there is no shame in his creation-if man cannot control his lust at a glimpse of a knee or an elbow that that is his problem not womans-women have died over the centuries to try and create the equal society that they deserve and yes it offends me when I see this backward step

The quran sanctions the death penalty for adulterers. Some countries kill rape victims as such.

Suicide bombing obviously did not exist when your madman was raving in the 6th century. Still -Martyrdom 4.74 9.111 etc.

The quran sanctions the death penalty for adulterers. Some countries kill rape victims as such.

Suicide bombing obviously did not exist when your madman was raving in the 6th century. Still - Martyrdom 4.74

9.111 etc. Mohammad himself was violent - fighting a war.

Chapter and verse please?



You need to equip yourself with a dictionary in the future.

Martyr: a person who suffers greatly or dies for a cause, belief, etc.

How is that similar to Suicide Bombing where the objective is to kill as many non-combatants as possible. Furthermore, the verse you quoted, you should search up and read it in the context of when it was revealed.



How is that even linked to suicide bombing? Clutching at straws.

The question is not "IF", but WHY they traveled to Afghanistan in the first place?