Year 12s: what will be the first way you research your future options? >>

Oasis vs Blur

Champagne Supernova

The clash of Britpop in the 90's! Which band is better and why? :music:

(edited 11 years ago)

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1

Democracy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZvZ_wu3c6Y

:biggrin:

Oasis gets my vote!

Reply 2

username306617

Seen them both live, Blur were better, however I like more of Oasis's songs.

Reply 3

username917703

Blur. Oasis spend too much time dicking about and come across as pretentious knobheads.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oqXVx3sBOk

Reply 4

Izzyeviel

Oasis, but the La's/Stone Roses would've blown them away if they hadn't had their problems.

Reply 5

username917703

Original post by Izzyeviel

Oasis, but the La's/Stone Roses would've blown them away if they hadn't had their problems.

They did

Their debut is better than anything Oasis did.

Reply 6

Redolent

Blur.

Never understood the Oasis worship really.

Reply 7

Izzyeviel

Original post by Wilfred Little

They did

Their debut is better than anything Oasis did.

Exactly. A lot of people today haven't heard of the Stone Roses but they can sing Wonderwall.

Reply 8

username917703

Original post by Izzyeviel

Exactly. A lot of people today haven't heard of the Stone Roses but they can sing Wonderwall.

I get what you're saying.

Reply 9

Mockery

Your sig really hurts my eyes :redface:

My vote goes for Oasis since they still maintain several entries in my top 20 all time best records!

Never quite developed a taste for Blur.

Reply 10

ysgytlaeth

Blur!
Liam Gallagher completely ruins Oasis :P

Reply 11

JordanS94

Blur, I think the fact that Damon Albarn is the vocals for Gorillaz kinda influences my decision a little :love:

Reply 12

ranbow99

In the last 2 years i've been getting more into Blur, before that it would have been Oasis.

Reply 13

ArtGoblin

Blur. Oasis have two good albums and a few additional great singles but Blur have consistently improved and Damon Albarn has shown he can do so much more than just front an indie band. Oasis and their later projects have churned out the same stuff for 20 years and it's boring.

Edit: Oops, cheated the system. Let's try again: Oasis = ugly, Alex James = beautiful.

(edited 11 years ago)

Reply 14

Plainview

Blur. Oasis were too derivative and took themselves too seriously. Blur are proper artists..

Reply 15

Thomas2

Blur. Just my preference.

Reply 16

thunder_chunky

Both were pretty good in their prime. Oasis were complete ***** but their music was awesome.

Reply 17

username612415

Original post by Champagne Supernova

The clash of Britpop in the 90's! Which band is better and why? :music:

There's a group of guys building sand sculptures near my house, some of them are really impressive. Today on my way to Asda I noticed one of them has actually made an Oasis vs Blur Sculpture :ahee:

Reply 18

username1135580

Oasis, purely because of Noel. But Blur were brilliant as well! They're both better than most of today's music :music:

Reply 19

pizzle223

Oasis were better but all their songs sound the same.

All of Blurs songs sound the same too saying that, although I haven't heard many of them.

If I'm honest I don't think either of them are, or have ever been, any good