The Student Room Group

**The "North Korea Watch 2013" Update Thread**

Scroll to see replies

Reply 340
He wouldn't start a war with the USA, he would lose. He knows it.
North Korea's only real ally is China and even they voted for the sanctions imposed against NK.
Kim attacking South Korea is far more likely but that would rapidly descend into a "tit-for-tat" exchange yielding little fruit at the expense of lives.
Reply 341
I've got my Swiss Army Knife ready, bring it on.
Reply 342
The two options I see at the moment are:
1. NK continues with threats but sees sense and doesn't take provocations too far, ie capture England, Germany, Russia's (et cetera) ambassadors
2. NK captures ambassadors aswell as provoking America to start war, with other countries joining in for various reasons, starting WW3 (the very pessimistic option)

Fun times hey!!!:biggrin:

Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 343
Anyone who thinks that North Korea has the fire power to launch nuclear missiles all the way to USA needs to rethink aerodynamics.
Original post by TheMagicRat
Yeah, I don't know why anyone here is proposing some crazy attack on North Korea as a whole. It is only the regime we don't like. We won't use nuclear weapons on an innocent civilian population. Our problem isn't with them at all.


Erm actually America has done - twice.
Original post by HumanSupremacist
But having gotten past such a barrier, a united Korea would be a massively successful state - South Korea is already the 12th largest economy and is already greatly successful.


An united Korea with an population of 80 million and having the Technological/Industrial output of S.Korea and the raw resources of the North Korea will give the Japanese and Chinese government heart attack! Although the Japanese are an US ally in the Pacific area, they would not like an strong unified Korea that can bargain for the Dokdo Islands in the Sea of Japan.
Original post by CelticSymphony67
I'm disputing the fact that NK are in a time warp, but to simply dismiss them is foolish. If they were running around the Korean Peninsula with Bow and Arrows, then fair enough, but they are not. There weapons may well be a bit outdated, but they can still do a great deal of damage, and the NK troops will outnumber the US 2 to 1.


If it did come to war, the Americans wont go in and recreate the Gettysburg or Somme with thousands of troops either side, they would obliterate them from the air and then send in ground troops in vehicles and with heavy support to mop up the rest.

Also i doubt that a nuke would even get half way there before the US or the SK brought it down
Original post by silverbolt
Erm actually America has done - twice.


I knew someone was going to say that. I'd be very surprised if they did in this day and age and I'd be even more surprised if they did in North Korea.
Original post by nikkoch
The two options I see at the moment are:
1. NK continues with threats but sees sense and doesn't take provocations too far, ie capture England, Germany, Russia's (et cetera) ambassadors
2. NK captures ambassadors aswell as provoking America to start war, with other countries joining in for various reasons, starting WW3 (the very pessimistic option)

Fun times hey!!!:biggrin:

Posted from TSR Mobile


Tbh, I very much doubt it will be WW3
Original post by silverbolt
If it did come to war, the Americans wont go in and recreate the Gettysburg or Somme with thousands of troops either side, they would obliterate them from the air and then send in ground troops in vehicles and with heavy support to mop up the rest.

Also i doubt that a nuke would even get half way there before the US or the SK brought it down


I agree this statement. The USA would use over 50 F-15E strike egeals to find and destroy all the Scud-C detrative NK missiles under an hour. Over 300 Tomahawks from the Ohio SSNB, LA attack sub, and the present Virginia class attack submarines will destroy the NK military command structure from the General staff building to the Infantry barracks. The Allied forces would have an superior C14 link system that gives top down commands from Staff Sargent to the 5 star General.
Original post by nikkoch
The two options I see at the moment are:
1. NK continues with threats but sees sense and doesn't take provocations too far, ie capture England, Germany, Russia's (et cetera) ambassadors
2. NK captures ambassadors aswell as provoking America to start war, with other countries joining in for various reasons, starting WW3 (the very pessimistic option)

Fun times hey!!!:biggrin:

Posted from TSR Mobile


There's no suggestion North Korea will capture ambassadors, they've merely said they can't guarantee their safety. It's just more threats of war.

If North Korea did take foreigners hostage then it would be the final straw for the USA and allies. Making the same old vague threats against their ally South Korea is one thing, threatening foreign citizens is another. I expect China wouldn't be very impressed either that might be the final kick to their rapidly decaying alliance. Without China North Korea has no fuel or food (with its only other source of food aid being the USA...).
Original post by sugar-n-spice
Does anyone know when the North Koreans first gained nuclear capabilities?
I heard it was the late 1980s, when the Soviet Union started to break up.
Original post by silverbolt
If it did come to war, the Americans wont go in and recreate the Gettysburg or Somme with thousands of troops either side, they would obliterate them from the air and then send in ground troops in vehicles and with heavy support to mop up the rest.

Also i doubt that a nuke would even get half way there before the US or the SK brought it down

Agreed. That is what the US will probably do. If it were troops on either side, unless the US got reinforcements, they would lose.
Original post by nikkoch
The two options I see at the moment are:
1. NK continues with threats but sees sense and doesn't take provocations too far, ie capture England, Germany, Russia's (et cetera) ambassadors
2. NK captures ambassadors aswell as provoking America to start war, with other countries joining in for various reasons, starting WW3 (the very pessimistic option)

Fun times hey!!!:biggrin:

Posted from TSR Mobile


:shock: Where did you get the idea that NK would take ambassadors hostage? Gosh, that would be terrible - goodness knows what the Russians, British and Japanese etc would do then?

Original post by silverbolt
If it did come to war, the Americans wont go in and recreate the Gettysburg or Somme with thousands of troops either side, they would obliterate them from the air and then send in ground troops in vehicles and with heavy support to mop up the rest.

Also i doubt that a nuke would even get half way there before the US or the SK brought it down


And don't forget those drones :sly:
Original post by silverbolt
If it did come to war, the Americans wont go in and recreate the Gettysburg or Somme with thousands of troops either side, they would obliterate them from the air and then send in ground troops in vehicles and with heavy support to mop up the rest.

Also i doubt that a nuke would even get half way there before the US or the SK brought it down


What is tragic is the fallout damage that will ensue. And no neighbouring country is going to allow NK's rogue missile to stray into their territory
Original post by pink pineapple
Tbh, I very much doubt it will be WW3


I agree.

I highly doubt that the North Korean situation would cause WW3 - on the other hand, unpredictable events could occur and rapidly escalate any crisis/conflict that may arise from the North Korean situation. For example (and we're taking a big leap here), other countries might craftily take advantage of a massive North Korean war (within the peninsula) to carry out their own interests...
Original post by NabRoh
Anyone who thinks that North Korea has the fire power to launch nuclear missiles all the way to USA needs to rethink aerodynamics.


Not sure where aerodynamics comes into it. It's entirely possible for a missile to be launched from any point on the planet and hit another point, even go right around the world and hit the launch site. It just need a rocket capable of reaching a high enough speed and altitude. Even a powerful enough gun could do it. Most ICBMs have a range that is capable of hitting most places on the planet. All the major nuclear powers could hit each other (and in the case of the UK and France with just submarines, they could still launch from home waters and hit any other nuclear armed country).
Original post by pink pineapple
Tbh, I very much doubt it will be WW3


Don't forget NK has a defence pact with China.
I'm really not sure what to think.

My parents seem to think the threat is a definite and real one - and as both have been in the Forces, they kinda do know what they're talking about (both were in during the Cold War).

On the other hand, the majority of the country is starving, famine and poverty is widespread and if invaded they'd probably last about two days before the Government was overthrown. It's the crazy fat dude with his finger on the button that is the worry I think.
Reply 359
Original post by kiss_me_now9
I'm really not sure what to think.

My parents seem to think the threat is a definite and real one - and as both have been in the Forces, they kinda do know what they're talking about (both were in during the Cold War).

On the other hand, the majority of the country is starving, famine and poverty is widespread and if invaded they'd probably last about two days before the Government was overthrown. It's the crazy fat dude with his finger on the button that is the worry I think.


I would say that the threat is more prominent for South Korea, Japan and US Bases in the Far East.

The Thing is North Korea does have a few ICBMs that could hit the North American Continent, they also are said to have nuclear warheads. Now the hard part is combining the two and putting them on a missile. We really dont know if they have done it or not.

Now if they did detonate a nuclear bomb over the US, an EMP would be their best bet. But I highly doubt they would do this, as they would be wiped off the map by Nuclear Missiles from US submarines.

North Korea can do a fair amount of damage if they have to. They do have a very large army, decent technology, a decent navy and a fair air force. It wouldn't be another Iraq "walk in the park" war.

If things really did go bad, at the end of the day the US and NATO would win the war after a few weeks but not without the utter destruction of Seoul, Tokyo and other major cities around the area, not to mention the missiles they launch into the North American continent (but a lot would be intercepted).

My biggest fear is Seoul being trampled over by the North Korean army.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending