British women committing international rape!

Sorry OP, we better close this thread since apparently rape and sexual assault only applies to women :rolleyes:

Reply 7

thunder_chunky

19

Original post by Shabalala

yeah at first I was wondering why he guy resisted but now I see why poor guy.

Maybe he just didn't want to have sex full stop.

Original post by Kiss

Sorry OP, we better close this thread since apparently rape and sexual assault only applies to women :rolleyes:

That's pretty much what I'm waiting for. Either people making jokes or saying that women can't rape men, blah blah blah.

Reply 8

Original post by thunder_chunky

Maybe he just didn't want to have sex full stop.

That's pretty much what I'm waiting for. Either people making jokes or saying that women can't rape men, blah blah blah.

I can just picture ArtGoblin now in her tower, sending off the mods with a wave of her hand and a shrill cackle of 'Fly my pretties, fly!'

Reply 9

*Not rape. Sexual assault.

Still very serious, but you can't call it rape when there's no penile penetration.

Reply 10

heirloom

14

I think its very brave of him to report this. I think men should be encouraged to report any sexual assault incidents that happen to them. It raises awareness and hopefully will kill of any stigma surrounding the issue. This also needs to be the case for domestic violence towards men, hopefully the corrie storyline will help

Reply 11

ChocoholicPolyglot

9

This reminds me of an article I once read about a man who was sexually assaulted by his wives in Africa. He refused to sleep with them because he found a new lady...He ended up dying as a result of the assault.

It just shows that women out there can also be quite aggressive.

Reply 12

Original post by edithwashere

*Not rape. Sexual assault.

Still very serious, but you can't call it rape when there's no penile penetration.

So that makes it less serious then?

You can rape a man as a women in a manner of fashions, either anally with something or simply by forcing yourself on a man when he doesn't want to have sex. It is possible for a women to slip a man Viagra beforehand without his knowledge or consent and proceed to have un-consensual intercourse, and there are cases where that has happened.

Reply 13

dennisraymondsmith

10

Was going to say what a lucky guy until i read she was 5ft4 and 190-200 pounds . YUCK

(edited 11 years ago)

Reply 14

Original post by Kiss

So that makes it less serious then?

You can rape a man as a women in a manner of fashions, either anally with something or simply by forcing yourself on a man when he doesn't want to have sex. It is possible for a women to slip a man Viagra beforehand without his knowledge or consent and proceed to have un-consensual intercourse, and there are cases where that has happened.

Where did I say it was less serious? I just said it isn't rape, which is true. Theoretically if a woman did the things you mention it still wouldn't be rape, only sexual assault or sexual coercion. Has to be a penis doing the penetration to make it rape, in the eyes of the law. Just as if a man violated a woman with an object, it's not rape.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 15

Original post by edithwashere

Where did I say it was less serious? I just said it isn't rape, which is true. Theoretically if a woman did the things you mention it still wouldn't be rape, only sexual assault or sexual coercion. Has to be a penis doing the penetration to make it rape, in the eyes of the law. Just as if a man violated a woman with an object, it's not rape.

Posted from TSR Mobile

So you're saying that women can't rape men based upon what the law says? What do you call un-consensual sex then?

Reply 16

Original post by Kiss

So you're saying that women can't rape men based upon what the law says? What do you call un-consensual sex then?

Sexual coercion. Where did I say I agree with it? I'm just pointing out current law. You really seem intent on putting words in my mouth.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 17

Original post by edithwashere

Sexual coercion. Where did I say I agree with it? I'm just pointing out current law. You really seem intent on putting words in my mouth.

Posted from TSR Mobile

You're merely saying that because you don't want to admit that un-consensual sex is rape.

The way you phrased:

"Still very serious, but you can't call it rape when there's no penile penetration"

Strongly implies you don't think men can be raped, which is of course untrue, and that you don't think it is as serious as a woman getting raped. The manner in which you have used the initial sentence wording 'Still very serious' presumes that this incidence was not as serious.

Reply 18

fluttershy

9

I think a big problem with our attitudes towards sexual crime is that it's a mix of outdated and modern attitudes. Older attitudes towards sex are very different from today. When it comes to double standards, quite a bit of it comes from updating attitudes towards women in regard to sex without updating attitudes towards men. There is also often a failure to recognise how other changes in attitude and society have influenced sex and sexuality. It wasn't that long ago that sex was a male penis penetrating a female vagina, largely for procreation but also for the pleasure of the male. Females had no pleasure from sex, the female orgasm didn't exist.

There is also the issue of attitudes to women in general. A woman was property of her father until she was married at which point she became property of her husband. A father and husband could treat "their" woman how they liked, but another man couldn't. A woman was property, and if you damaged someone elses property you were puninshed or compensated them. Often the compensation was in the form of "you touch it you but it" i.e force marriage. Also, a woman was weak, vulnerable and helpless without men, and easily controlled by men. The attitude for both genders though was that if they were seduced into it (even by underhand means) they deserved it, and if the other person was particularly good looking, wealthy, powerful or famous then they were lucky, not a victim.
Again, attitudes towards women have moved on faster than attitudes towards men.

What makes it worse is that some feminists have an agenda that encourages a switch between old fasioned and modern views when it suits them. They are happy to embrace modern ideas and attitudes when it works in their favour, but will throw them away in favour of outdated attitudes and ideas when it doesn't suit them. They are often aided by men, particularly those who are still trying to cling onto what is left of the patriarchy, who are happy to embrace outdated ideas that put men above women, and to be honest are often too old and too past it to care anyway about the real effect it's having.

Reply 19