America - like to hit but not get hit
Surely this is the truth. Can anyone justifiably say that what America is doung across the world is not terrorism?
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
Scroll to see replies
Keeping the Islamists under control just as they did the Communists and fascists.
Without America's lead, we'd have Jihadists afflicting more countries with the yolk of totalitarian Islam than they already do.
Remember, the Islamists have been at it for far longer than America's war on terror (before anyone brings that up as being the spark)
Churchill warned about Islam as far back in 1899.
Without America's lead, we'd have Jihadists afflicting more countries with the yolk of totalitarian Islam than they already do.
Remember, the Islamists have been at it for far longer than America's war on terror (before anyone brings that up as being the spark)
Churchill warned about Islam as far back in 1899.
Original post by Mr Advice
Surely this is the truth. Can anyone justifiably say that what America is doung across the world is not terrorism?
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
the Muslim brotherhood has been active since the 20's. Extremism in Islam goes right back to Muhammad's days as a war-lord and conqueror of Pagan/Kuffar lands.
Original post by slickrick666999
the Muslim brotherhood has been active since the 20's. Extremism in Islam goes right back to Muhammad's days as a war-lord and conqueror of Pagan/Kuffar lands.
So you combat terrorism with terrorism do you?
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Chindits
Keeping the Islamists under control just as they did the Communists and fascists.
Without America's lead, we'd have Jihadists afflicting more countries with the yolk of totalitarian Islam than they already do.
Remember, the Islamists have been at it for far longer than America's war on terror (before anyone brings that up as being the spark)
Churchill warned about Islam as far back in 1899.
Without America's lead, we'd have Jihadists afflicting more countries with the yolk of totalitarian Islam than they already do.
Remember, the Islamists have been at it for far longer than America's war on terror (before anyone brings that up as being the spark)
Churchill warned about Islam as far back in 1899.
Their lead is s****. It's bought no good to this world.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Chindits
Without America's lead, we'd have Jihadists afflicting more countries with the yolk of totalitarian Islam than they already do.
And then we'd all have egg on our faces.
Original post by Aj12
Given that their actions are generally not targeted at civilian populations with the main aim being to spread terror I feel confident that most of their actions do not constitute terrorism.
This.
The United States does not intentionally target civilians, and despite a few setbacks, it's clear its intentions are good.
Original post by Cannotbelieveit
This.
The United States does not intentionally target civilians, and despite a few setbacks, it's clear its intentions are good.
The United States does not intentionally target civilians, and despite a few setbacks, it's clear its intentions are good.
Haha and that makes the million murders they committed alright? Wake up.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Chindits
Keeping the Islamists under control just as they did the Communists and fascists.
Without America's lead, we'd have Jihadists afflicting more countries with the yolk of totalitarian Islam than they already do.
Remember, the Islamists have been at it for far longer than America's war on terror (before anyone brings that up as being the spark)
Churchill warned about Islam as far back in 1899.
Without America's lead, we'd have Jihadists afflicting more countries with the yolk of totalitarian Islam than they already do.
Remember, the Islamists have been at it for far longer than America's war on terror (before anyone brings that up as being the spark)
Churchill warned about Islam as far back in 1899.
It's gone on way longer than in 1899, it's been going on since the crusades. The only difference is that the weapons are different, and an even bigger christian country is involved.
(edited 11 years ago)
Original post by Mr Advice
Firstly lol million what a foolish statement. If you want to look at who kills the most people in the US's recent wars you'll find its the insurgents and groups like al Qaeda and the Taliban that kill the most civilians. Or even Saddam who oversaw the murder of a million Iraqi's
Secondly no one is claiming that it makes it ok for the US to kill civilians. However to call accidental civilian deaths a terrorist attack is just stupid. terrorism involves the deliberate targeting of civilians to spread terror and fear to achieve aims. The US focuses on what can be seen as legitimate military targets in most cases. Most of their actions are not in any way terrorism
(edited 11 years ago)
Original post by hiiiii
its really hard to feel sad for america ..they killed 30 ppl in Afghan wedding a few days ago..14 dead were children ...no one cried for them because they r poor and muslims .
I agree, the news is far to pro-USA.
Original post by Mr Advice
Surely this is the truth. Can anyone justifiably say that what America is doung across the world is not terrorism?
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
Quite simply they are trying to extend civilization around the world while barbaric Islamic extremists are trying to destroy civilization.
Original post by hiiiii
its really hard to feel sad for america ..they killed 30 ppl in Afghan wedding a few days ago..14 dead were children ...no one cried for them because they r poor and muslims .
Collateral damage of a warzone. Unfortunate but its the reality of war.
Boston is not a warzone.
Original post by Aj12
Given that their actions are generally not targeted at civilian populations with the main aim being to spread terror I feel confident that most of their actions do not constitute terrorism.
Aslong as its not their citizens getting, they don't give a hoot. I think they kill something like 10 civilians for every 1 militant in their drone attacks?
Btw love the way you take negging so seriously to actually go hunt down my last post to neg it, bit funny that you got so butt hurt.
Original post by RtGOAT
Collateral damage of a warzone. Unfortunate but its the reality of war.
Boston is not a warzone.
Boston is not a warzone.
They die, so its ok because its a "reality of war", when some guy (assuming a Muslim did the boston thing) retaliates in kind, its suddenly not ok.
I mean they are both equally wrong and unjustifiable but strange how one seems more ok to you then the other.
Original post by IdeasForLife
They die, so its ok because its a "reality of war", when some guy (assuming a Muslim did the boston thing) retaliates in kind, its suddenly not ok.
I mean they are both equally wrong and unjustifiable but strange how one seems more ok to you then the other.
I mean they are both equally wrong and unjustifiable but strange how one seems more ok to you then the other.
Its all about who/what the target is.
Militant Islamists or innocent runners.
Original post by RtGOAT
Its all about who/what the target is.
Militant Islamists or innocent runners.
Militant Islamists or innocent runners.
Wonder why they do follow up attacks? http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/20/us-drones-strikes-target-rescuers-pakistan
Hamas uses this tactic apparently, the USA does it aswell. If Hamas is a terrorist group, what is the USA? Pretty sure innocent rescuers are in the same field as innocent runners.
Quick Reply
Related discussions
- I want to become a musician
- Im 18 and my parents still hit me
- My dad hit me
- could anyone give me any feedback on my review for GCSE english language
- Why can I never interpret what the a-level biology exam questions are asking me?
- Gap Year Lonely Advice Help!
- Should I leave my bf?
- Kallisto's Tuesday Question: Summer!
- I kinda want my mum to divorce my dad!
- Driving a car
- A level mechanics help
- Should most free kicks be defended without a wall?
- Driving accident
- My GF and clubbing…
- Submitted dissertation in the wrong font
- please give advice regarding parents.
- Feeling 'off' about a guy on my girlfriends course she is getting close with
- Has anyone worked at Curry's/P.C.World?
- Newtons laws- object sinking into ground -help needed
- Growth and height as a teen
Latest
Trending
Last reply 1 day ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 1 day ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 1 day ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?Trending
Last reply 1 day ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 1 day ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 1 day ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?
