Was 9/11 an inside job set up by the US government?

One thing I never understood about the conspiracy theory is that why did the hyjackers get themselves killed for it? what's the point in taking part in a huge conspiracy if you wont even live to reap the benefits?

What about the possibility of it being done by Israel?

I think its an inside Job, there's overwhelming evidence to suggest its an inside job, so I believe its an inside job.
- Structure designed in mind to handle multiple plane crashes
- Never has fire destroyed steel structures that have had a harsher inferno going on for 20hours
- Motives for Oil and War, American greed
- Pentagon missing plane wreckage
- Field near the white whitehouse, lack of wreckage, civilians or anything
- WTC 7 fell without a plane smashing it, fall debris from the north tower apparently caused it, but I didn't see a fall of tower 7 until 5pm
- Even so if it was falling debris, if the towers weren't imploded in the first place all structures would remain standing, but the trade center 7 falling in 6.5 seconds is unbelievable
- The cover story was weak, pass ports apparently found on the streets, red boxes of the plane seen but then hidden away
- Complete surveillance of the trade center as evidence including the boxes was removed
- Remains of thermite ignited steal seen at the wreckage
- Flying a low altitude on a plane, with an apparently inexperienced saudi air plane rookie, I doubt he could hit the tower based on the cover story, the planes were simply a distraction, I suppose the CIA could've being involved in faking calls or taking the lives of civilians for the cover story, it is unknown
- Phone calls on airplanes that high, really?
- A plane said destroyed by the wreckage landed, and the passengers were escorted into a secret room, none of the passengers came back out.
I've got a lot more but for now this is all I can think of

Dumb. All of that has been disproven.

Anyway, my main problem with this conspiracy is that once you accept it, it's pretty much a downward spiral.

You have to accept that the US government is almost certainly evil (including almost all its officials). This means you can't trust anything the US says, ever. Since Britain has a special relationship with the US, that means you can't trust anything the UK government does either. This ends in you becoming a complete paranoid wreck, seeing evil dark conspiracies wherever you look.

And, if you think the US and UK governments are part of a sinister plot, what is to stop you bombing the Houses of Parliament?

It's not being solidly dis-proven though, don't link me to debunking 9/11 site because some of their debunks are ****ing retarded. No I feel that the bush administration was evil, not the whole of the US administration. I accept events like 7/7 were Muslim terrorists in response to 9/11, but 9/11 it self looks point blank like an inside job to me. I'm not a paranoid wreck, I share my thoughts on the internet and when people ask, I don't obsess over 9/11, I discuss it when it comes up in conversation. Try to convince me it was planes that brought down too skyscraper towers designed to withstand 5 plane crashes.

Anyway Alex Jones is a ****ing nutcase

Pro tip: when a big plane in a sky smashes into a building, the buildings don't tend to fall straight down.

I don't know, but I've seen a lot of videos on YouTube that imply It was. Also, some are suggesting that Boston, was too a false flag. :/

What's with thr Muslim conspiracy theories.

In this day and age people are all conditioned. They are like a bunch of sheep. And what herds them is the TV set. What ever mainstream says goes. Mainstream calls other people (the minority) who do not fall in line to their conditioning and views, because they are able to think for themselves as 'conspiracy theorists, 'nuts,' 'quacks,' and so on...

And the sheep or zombies automatically label you as one if you have an alternative view no matter how credible it is.



Mainstream on the same day of 9/11 blamed Osama bin Laden (OBL) for the attack. On the same day, without there being any investigation or anything. They already had the story mapped out, with all media coverage depicting OBL as the culprit.

As the famous saying goes "If you tell a lie long enough it becomes the truth"

However, any sane person that looks into 9/11 being objective and putting all preconceived opinions aside would definitely come to the conclusion that OBL could not have done it.

If you just focus on building 7 alone you would come to that conclusion. Building 7 the 3rd tower to collapse into it's own foot print in the same manner as the other two towers was not hit by a plane. Had some fire on a few floors, that it. But you see it goes against the laws of physics and science for fire to cause a sky scraper to collapse at near free-fall speed (i.e. as if it had no resistance).
.
And this is what the professional architectures and engineers are telling us based on science (see: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/home.html).

The official story claims fire caused the 3 collapses. But never in history before or since 9/11 has a steel-framed tower collapsed due to fire. The only 3 to ever collapse in history due to fire all coincidentally occurred on the same day 9/11.

The only possible way for these steel-framed towers to collapse and be pulverised the way it did is through demolition. There was even residue of a demolition explosive found in the dust of the concrete that has been confirmed in a lab. Not to mention numerous eye-witness accounts recorded on the same day of the event all saying the same thing more or less 'that there was a huge explosion: Boom, Boom, Boom' before the buildings collapsed. Explosions coming from the basement levels. The plane hit the very top end, why is there explosions in the basement? You can even hear the explosions on video.

But none of this is reported in the media. Or even considered by the official story. None of it matters. But then you have people (like popular mechanics) who are phonies that attempt to discredit all views that are against the official story by debunking them. They try to debunk you.

There has even been a peer-reviewed paper written on 9/11. The 9/11 truth movement wants there to be an independent investigation as to what happened that day, but there would never be. Nobody that was really involved in the 9/11 attack is going to be prosecuted, instead all the blame is going to go on a patsy OBL as the culprit and mastermind. And it is really scary, to see the media get away with such propaganda without providing any evidence (when you actually think about it!) that OBL did or had anything to do with 9/11. All they tell us is, he did it! Proof? None. It's either you accept it or your a 'conspiracy nut,' which is just a rude dismissive term used against people that actually think for a change.


The demolition aspect is just one aspect, there is much more such as:
- NORAD (air defence) was doing drills on the day of 9/11 of planes flying into buildings. And coincidentally the exact same thing happened on the day of their drill? Which is more or less a cover story as to why the planes targeted for the towers, and pentagon were not intercepted once flying off course.

- According to the official story Mohammed Atta's passport was found intact on the side-walk? Really? So you are telling me the passport managed to survive the plane impact, and the fire which was supposedly strong enough to cause the steel frame building to be pulverized and collapse into own footprint to be found intact conveniently on the side-walk! If that is the case, the towers should have been made out of that bloody resilient paper. How stupid do they think people are? Very stupid otherwise they wouldn't have done 9/11 and concocted such a BS story as a cover up to begin with.

- Hani Hanjour allegedly responsible for flying the Boeing into the pentagon which required a maneuver that few skilled pilots would be able to do at such speeds in order to hit the pentagon how it was hit from the side, could not possibly have been done by him as he couldn't fly a Cesna plane few months prior during his training.

- Where is all the footage that was ceased by the FBI on the day of 9/11 that would have shown what really hit the Pentagon? Instead all that has been released is a grainy image showing something that looks more like a spec and then an explosion. The Pentagon should be surrounded by cameras, where is the footage? If they never had anything to hide, and the official story is all true such footage should have been released on the same day.

- The damage at the scene of the Pentagon does not fit that of a plane. The damage at the scene does not relate to that of a plane. Plus there was no real plane wreckage as is usually seen after a plane has crashed. Where is all the plane debris? Official story it disintegrated upon impact. Lies! That does not happen. But a lot of things seemed to happen conveniently that day for them.

There is just so much inconsistencies between the official story and what really happened. The official story is just a poor cover up, blamed on OBL who has been made to be the big monster by the media.

In my opinion after researching 9/11 thoroughly is that it was a false-flag terror attack. And to know who likely did you just have to follow who benefited the most from it. And it wasn't the man with an Ak-47, wearing slippers, who supposedly was operating in a non-existed CIA like cave in the mountains of Tora Bora.

For more information on 9/11 watch the following documentaries:
- Zero Investigation Into 9/11
- 9/11 Blueprint for Truth
- 9/11 Loose Change (2006), (2007) and (2009)

There is so much more out there. Check out this for the extensive list: http://www.911docs.net/#911_Documentaries

I won't be surprised if a conditioned sheep attempts to read my message and try debunk everything I said. Because that is all they do, they try to debunk you without offering any real information except that you must accept the 'official OBL did it story.' Well I am not going to respond to anybody, I've been through that circle too many times. We are in the year 2013, if you still can't figure that 9/11 was not done by OBL with the immense amount of proof that is out there to prove it, then there is no helping you.

Some people would always be sheep and need the mainstream to form opinions for them. Some would wake up from that hypnotic trance. And would accept the horrible truth, because of it being the truth. Others are afraid to accept the implications of such a truth and would rather believe that OBL the patsy did it all. Why? Because of this...

Your views and conspiracies on this?

Pro tip: when a big plane in a sky smashes into a building, the buildings don't tend to fall straight down.

Irrespective of all the details of the actual attacks, in my mind, the US government doesn't have a motive. There is absolutely no reason to conduct a high risk false flag attack of this nature, that if leaked, would de-legitimize the state to the point of collapse. War with Iraq/Afghanistan would have been justified by the US government without 9/11. That's the biggest problem with false flag attacks and people claiming comparisons to the Reichstag fire in '33 and Nazi-Germany. If that happened today, it would immediately be leaked/discovered.

But they have no lead in Boston, yet?