The Student Room Group

Why abortion is wrong.

Scroll to see replies

Reply 540
Original post by Ghostly.
So wait, if you're saying it's wrong to kill a baby in the womb because it's murder etc etc

Why aren't you stressing over the real murders? The adults and young children who are murdered every day. Those who are bombed in other countries and those who are killed by horrible parents etc, that worse and you haven't touched on that. Focus on the **** that is happening to actual babies/adults before you touch on the unborn.

why not multitask?

this single thread does not cover every single subject. A person's response covers that single subject, but does not assume a response towards another subject unless clearly stated.
Original post by Ghostly.

Why aren't you stressing over the real murders?


Thats a huge assumption.
This is by far the worst anti-abortion analogy I have ever heard.
Original post by da_nolo

from conception. we are all human - all deserve respect and be given the right to life (in exclusion to self defense). it is based on human rights, which is due to/for those who are human beings.


To use another JJ Thomson analogy, do you feel the term "acorn" is synonymous with "oak tree"? Because to say that an embryo is a human from conception is suggesting something similar. Or, to use perhaps my favourite one from Glover, would you suggest raw cake mix is synonymous with an actual cake?
Reply 544
Original post by Muppetmad
To use another JJ Thomson analogy, do you feel the term "acorn" is synonymous with "oak tree"? Because to say that an embryo is a human from conception is suggesting something similar. Or, to use perhaps my favourite one from Glover, would you suggest raw cake mix is synonymous with an actual cake?


Tree?
there are many oak trees out there, lets narrow it to 1: shingle oak.

referred to as Quercus imbricaria, as it is the scientific name.
the acorn is in fact an Quercus imbricaria. it may not be a tree, but a tree (and the acorn) is only a portion of the Quercus imbricaria entire life. just like how you are an embryo or an adult for just a portion or part of your human life cycle.



cake mix?
this analogy does not work. you have a mixture or many things that may be turned into many things. you do not have a single path. two parents to an offspring. two human parents may only procreate a human offspring/child
Original post by da_nolo
Tree?
there are many oak trees out there, lets narrow it to 1: shingle oak.

referred to as Quercus imbricaria, as it is the scientific name.
the acorn is in fact an Quercus imbricaria. it may not be a tree, but a tree (and the acorn) is only a portion of the Quercus imbricaria entire life. just like how you are an embryo or an adult for just a portion or part of your human life cycle.



cake mix?
this analogy does not work. you have a mixture or many things that may be turned into many things. you do not have a single path. two parents to an offspring. two human parents may only procreate a human offspring/child


You missed the point. If you had a fully grown oak tree, would you feel morally justified chopping it down? If you had an acorn, would you feel justified not growing it?


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 546
Original post by Hypocrism
You missed the point. If you had a fully grown oak tree, would you feel morally justified chopping it down? If you had an acorn, would you feel justified not growing it?

the person was trying to separate the condition of a human offspring as being human by use of lame analogies that do not work. there was never a question of morals. I replied correctly.

as for your questions, the "Quercus imbricaria" is not "homo sapien" and therefore not human. I have different perspective between how a human should be treated because we are all humans and are all equal though unique/different.
I only believe abortion is wrong when its used as a method of contraception or have had a drunken one night stand I know a fair few girls who had unprotected sex, didnt take the morning after pill and then as a result ended up pregnant, I think that abortion is wrong when irresponsible idiots get themseleves pregnant but not using protection and then think they can just have an abortion and everything is okay and lifes a bed of roses

However I think in the case of rape, the health of the mother or the baby or infact if the person was using contraception and that by accident they ended up pregnant then no abortion is not wrong, isint it wrong to say force a 14 year old girl who got raped to keep a baby she never wanted, is it a right for a 25 year old woman who was taking care of her own sexual health and was cautious but the condom split and she ended up pregnant to have to bring a child into the world she nevert wanted ? Surelyits better that these people abort the babies rather than bring them into the world when clearly the parents never wanted them and will not be able to provide for it??

Another thing I disagree with abortion is people who leave it till there very late into the preganacy verging on the limit for abortion unless its medical I think its digsuting that people abort at 20 odd weeks when they are pregnant. I have no issues with abortion but really leaving it so long is just a terrible thing to do atleast do it as soon as you find out when its not an actually baby.
Original post by Hypocrism
-Suicide is not illegal in the UK and hasn't been since 1961

-Reactions to stimuli do not show consciousness or ability to feel pain, we know the spinal cord reflexes develop before the CNS and neural development doesn't finish until about the age of 2. At 20 weeks it's pretty certain the embryo cannot perceive anything consciously or feel pain.

-Parents don't have a right to choose to kill their child after birth because its passed the point (about 24 weeks) where it can feel pain, a common landmark for forbidding unnecessary abortion. The baby is also not a part of the mother's body after birth, hence she is not affected by the baby remaining alive.

-your argument is from emotion, with no substance behind it, making it weak.


Posted from TSR Mobile



I think her point is that aborting at 20 weeks is much worse than aborting at say 10 weeks as its getting very close to when the baby, embryo cells whatever one wants to call it becomes very nearly a viable human being and of course there are babies that are born at 25 weeks so I guess to an extent thats where people have an issue that certainly is my only issue with abortion is woman who leave it so late.
Original post by SillyMilly
I only believe abortion is wrong when its used as a method of contraception or have had a drunken one night stand I know a fair few girls who had unprotected sex, didnt take the morning after pill and then as a result ended up pregnant, I think that abortion is wrong when irresponsible idiots get themseleves pregnant but not using protection and then think they can just have an abortion and everything is okay and lifes a bed of roses

However I think in the case of rape, the health of the mother or the baby or infact if the person was using contraception and that by accident they ended up pregnant then no abortion is not wrong, isint it wrong to say force a 14 year old girl who got raped to keep a baby she never wanted, is it a right for a 25 year old woman who was taking care of her own sexual health and was cautious but the condom split and she ended up pregnant to have to bring a child into the world she nevert wanted ? Surelyits better that these people abort the babies rather than bring them into the world when clearly the parents never wanted them and will not be able to provide for it??

Another thing I disagree with abortion is people who leave it till there very late into the preganacy verging on the limit for abortion unless its medical I think its digsuting that people abort at 20 odd weeks when they are pregnant. I have no issues with abortion but really leaving it so long is just a terrible thing to do atleast do it as soon as you find out when its not an actually baby.


Why so much hate for these women? Why should their lifestyles have anything to do with their choices, given that the vast majority of pregnancies are terminated before 13 weeks, there's actually not queues of women at 20 weeks getting abortions. It can be extremely traumatic and having people reduce it to "oh, your fault for having unprotected sex" is really hurtful. Have some empathy and try not to sound so vicious about women you don't even know.
Original post by edithwashere
Why so much hate for these women? Why should their lifestyles have anything to do with their choices, given that the vast majority of pregnancies are terminated before 13 weeks, there's actually not queues of women at 20 weeks getting abortions. It can be extremely traumatic and having people reduce it to "oh, your fault for having unprotected sex" is really hurtful. Have some empathy and try not to sound so vicious about women you don't even know.


did you not read a word of what I said ??? I have plenty of empathy I said I only disagree with woman having abortions when they use it as a mode to contraception. I have no issues with a woman who has unprotected sex but really there is no excuse in this day and age to be so stupid as to have unprotected sex and then not taking the morning after pill do you not think this is a immature stupid way to behave?, surely its pretty clear =unprotected sex = pregnancies as I have said some woman and I mean SOME use it as a mode of protection they think that if they do end up pregnant then they can just abort the pregnancy.

Again if you actually read what I wrote i didnt state that all woman have abortions at 20 weeks but those who leave it for so long that are not for medical reasons I do think are in the wrong 20 weeks is a long time.

No its not 'hurtful' most sexually active woman take the responsibility to atleast have some form of protection whether this be the pill, condoms or even taking the morning after pill I dont see how you justify having unproteced sex and not having the common sense to take the morning after pill then making out the woman are some sort of innocent victim who ended up pregnant. I never said I was anti abortion only woman who think they can be irressponsible with their sex lives and an abortion will fix it all
Original post by edithwashere
Why so much hate for these women? Why should their lifestyles have anything to do with their choices, given that the vast majority of pregnancies are terminated before 13 weeks, there's actually not queues of women at 20 weeks getting abortions. It can be extremely traumatic and having people reduce it to "oh, your fault for having unprotected sex" is really hurtful. Have some empathy and try not to sound so vicious about women you don't even know.


and I never mentioned lifestyle using contraception is nothing do with life styles whether your in a relationship having casual sex or one night stands every woman needs to protect herself from pregnancy I cant see how this is a wrong view to have
Original post by edithwashere
Worrying. Particularly as many midwives are involved with terminations and miscarriages, I would hope that she learns how to evoke a little sympathy for real patients.


There is a quote button, thank you. If you're going to talk about me, do it directly, at least.

Yes, I am fully aware that Midwives deal with that side of things. And I am 100% dedicated to helping those women get through the experience safely and with the least amount of added stress possible. Your personal feelings shouldn't, and can't, come into it when you're a Midwife. Work and personal opinion are seperate. I am allowed my own personal opinion on this issue.

I have more than enough empathy. Doesn't mean I agree with it, though.
Original post by HopefulMidwife
There is a quote button, thank you. If you're going to talk about me, do it directly, at least.

Yes, I am fully aware that Midwives deal with that side of things. And I am 100% dedicated to helping those women get through the experience safely and with the least amount of added stress possible. Your personal feelings shouldn't, and can't, come into it when you're a Midwife. Work and personal opinion are seperate. I am allowed my own personal opinion on this issue.

I have more than enough empathy. Doesn't mean I agree with it, though.


Actually, some midwives are quite keen on shunning certain aspects of their job due to personal reasons, so whilst its unusual it's not impossible.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-22279857
Original post by edithwashere
Actually, some midwives are quite keen on shunning certain aspects of their job due to personal reasons, so whilst its unusual it's not impossible.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-22279857


Any medical professional can allow their personal opinions to get in the way of treatment, that, however, doesn't mean it should. You're taught that in Uni.
Original post by HopefulMidwife
Any medical professional can allow their personal opinions to get in the way of treatment, that, however, doesn't mean it should. You're taught that in Uni.


Fair enough. Well I hope you are as good and kind a midwife as all the ones I have met, it's a wonderful profession. :smile:
Original post by Hypocrism
Rubbish, you put words in the poster's mouth with your snarky, sarcastic comparison of infanticide with bringing up a child in a broken home.


Posted from TSR Mobile


I'm trying to look for the original quote that I replied to, bare with me.

Edit:

Okay, I can't even find it (I went through about 10 pages, still couldn't lol) so I don't know whether I was replying with some validity, or not. So I'll just leave it.

I'm not even really gonna engage in this debate anyway, not properly. They just go around in circles with various ad hominen attacks, and anger on both sides with no real conclusion. Not worth it.

One thing I will say, however, about the law not seeing a fetus as a person. I don't think that's much of a valid point. The law is fluid and decided by other human beings. It is not an absolute truth. At various times in the judical system, various groups have no been defined as having a personhood. Maybe it'll change in regards to babies, maybe not. Who knows.

This debate has no right answer, only opinion. And each side thinks they're right. So, I'm out.
(edited 10 years ago)
Original post by edithwashere
Fair enough. Well I hope you are as good and kind a midwife as all the ones I have met, it's a wonderful profession. :smile:


Thank you, it really is. I can't wait. I want to specialise in bereavement midwifery, so I will likely be working with women who have been through abortions as well as women who have suffered IUDs.

I hope you didn't mean what you said about avoiding me if you ever come across me as a Midwife. I have strong opinions about abortion, yes, but I could never let a woman under my care feel discriminated against or mistreated because of that. I would probably cry when alone, and have thoughts in my head, but to transfer it into my conduct - no way. The worst I would do is respectfully ask my superiors if another Midwife could take my client if I really felt I couldn't handle it, if that.
Original post by March
Interesting, isn't it? How the same people who call themselves 'pro-life' seem to be very much okay with cutting support for the poorest and most in need members of society when it saves them a pretty penny in taxes. It's a point most people overlook in debates.


Umm, not me :s-smilie:

What I find interesting, though, is the same people who are pro-choice don't give a damn about the millions of baby boys who have their genitals mutilated without their consent, daily.

Since we're making generalisations here.
I'm neither pro-life or pro-choice.
Thinking about it now, I don't think I could ever cope with having an abortion. And looking at how a baby develops in the womb, i would call that baby a human life ~12 weeks.
But who is to say that my opinions may change if I actually did become pregnant, or was raped, or if my own health was threatened when carrying a baby?
Also, just because *I* don't think I could go through with it, it doesn't mean I would look down on a woman that could or did have an abortion.

The choice should be there for women who need it, and I believe others should not criticise a woman's choice just because it wouldn't be the choice they would make themselves.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending