84 schools have NO white British pupils at all... double the number of five years ago

Your pretty dim.

Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Celts, Picts, Friesians, Danes, Swedes, and Norwegians all have one thing in common: they are WHITE. Since the British people are a fusion of those peoples they too are naturally white.

The above people all had a European culture and NOT an African or an Asian culture. Britain too has a European culture and English is a Germanic language -- which also happens to be European.

What is totally unacceptable is the importation of millions of 3rd world aliens and making foreign ghettos of our large cities changing both the racial and cultural homogeneity of this country.

Why does pointing this out make me a "racist", but if you celebrate the fact that there are less white people in the UK you are an "anti-racist"?

You're not anti-racist at all, you're anti-white.

but they won't be raised around similar social values

I KNOW.

I am stating that these trends exist.

I am saying that they are important.

for highlighting the truth, that white British children are fast becoming a minority in regions of their own country? why do you hate white people so much that you celebrate their ethnic replacement?

Racial and cultural homogeneity? didn't the English hate the Irish as well as the Scots and Welsh hated the English while some Irish men hated the scots and they all hated the English together before the "importation" of 3rd world aliens

We don't know that.

Why do you value group-based statistical generalisations over individualised empirical facts?

I didn't say "only". I simply said that there are trends if you like. I have more in common with the cultures of other White people. There is more difference between me and a Pakistani than someone White Scottish. This perfectly exemplifies my point, I'm not sure how you think it doesn't.

Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Celts, Picts, Friesians, Danes, Swedes, and Norwegians all have one thing in common: they are WHITE. Since the British people are a fusion of those peoples they too are naturally white.

The above people all had a European culture and NOT an African or an Asian culture. Britain too has a European culture and English is a Germanic language -- which also happens to be European.

What is totally unacceptable is the importation of millions of 3rd world aliens and making foreign ghettos of our large cities changing both the racial and cultural homogeneity of this country.

Why does pointing this out make me a "racist", but if you celebrate the fact that there are less white people in the UK you are an "anti-racist"?

You're not anti-racist at all, you're anti-white.

That you think you would feel more at home living with a German or Polish or Hungarian white family than you would with a fully-westernised British Asian family only goes to show that you've spent literally no time outside of your little bubble. Go live abroad for a year and come back when you're in the middle of intense culture shock.

and people still believe multiculturalism can work

Your pretty dim. ONCE AGAIN I will state that I do not believe in inherent traits between races. However, you cannot deny that different cultures exist even between equivalent classes in different countries. I am not debating the cause of this, simply stating that tradition in regions dictates the tradition of an ethnic group, traditions they bring with them to other countries, affecting the way they form their culture in said new country. The trends exist in certain races.

Pretty sure I said White Scottish, meaning at no point did I say that the groups you mentioned would be similar. Nice try, though.

I didn't say "only". I simply said that there are trends if you like. I have more in common with the cultures of other White people. There is more difference between me and a Pakistani than someone White Scottish. This perfectly exemplifies my point, I'm not sure how you think it doesn't.

If you're white British you're advocating the gradual genocide of your own race.

If you are not white British you are not in a position to patronize those who care about their nation and its people.

OK, so follow it through to a logical conclusion.

Your issue is:

People of white ethnicity are more likely to be socialized into a stereotypically British culture.
People on non-white ethnicity are more likely to be socialized into a hybrid or alien culture.
Therefore we should seek to preserve white British ethnicity if we wish to preserve British culture.

My initial response is:

How do you determine what British culture is?

Found that for you.

But I’m not celebrating there being fewer white people in the UK. Nobody is advocating that. And it isn’t happening either – the white population is growing.
The problem you have is this: you view British culture as intrinsic to being white. But this simply isn’t the case. As we’ve seen in this thread, socialization is the determinant of culture, not skin colour. Which leads on to the question, once again, why the hell does it matter what colour people are?

I believe that the trends that exist are so deeply entrenched in different communities that they will have significant effects on children born into these ethnic groups, to the extent that the original causes of the trends are, or soon will be, irrelevant.

Your first two lines are correct. My issue, really, is that this no white school thing is a problem. because of the different cultures between different races, the fact that schools exist where one of these cultures, the biggest, majority culture, does not exist, is problematic. The fact that this would imply communities with few or no White British people exist large enough to contain schools is segregation and a problematic lack of integration.

I am not talking of preserving ethnicity at all.

The culture-bearing unit is the individual: this is a fact. For example, my entire lexicon has been developed based on the adoption of words that I have seen or heard other people use. It doesn't matter where I'm born, what ethnic identity I hold, or what other people with the same ethnic identity know; if I, as an individual, do not encounter a specific word, I will never know it*. Statistical generalisations do not have any bearing on the empirical facts of cultural distribution. Why do you insist on imprecision when precision is available?

*This is why I argue 'integration' is a unachievable and mythical notion; we will never be exposed to (much less adopt) the full range of cultural themes that exist within each individual. We will always be incompatible with somebody.