For the last question I wrote:
- lack of prey
- loss of habitat
- Founder effect. If you looked, some of the reintroduction sites were really far from the other groups, thus they were reproductively isolated, which meant that they would inbreed and lower genetic variety, thus they are more susceptible to disease/ negative results of selective pressure.
What the hell was the microfibril question? Why couldn't they make it clear what they want us to tell them?! Also, I think I've dropped marks on the taxonomic data, critical evaluation and the microfibril question. But I bet I drop loads on the data questions. Why were there so many data questions?!?!
Do we have an unofficial mark scheme?