Law Unit 4 14th June 2013 (AQA)
Scroll to see replies
Original post by xxm
I mentioned intoxication in just one sentence no need to go into detail. Overall though I was happy!
I mentioned intoxication in just one sentence no need to go into detail. Overall though I was happy!Awesome. Good luck with your other exams, if you have any.
Original post by lharto
For the second scenario 1st question I got theft, robbery, burglary, duress and 2nd question theft, fraud and obtaining services. 
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
Exact same as me.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by lharto
For the second scenario 1st question I got theft, robbery, burglary, duress and 2nd question theft, fraud and obtaining services.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
I got theft robbery burglary 91a and 19b and duress
Then I got criminal damage, (no theft
) fraud and obtaining services - ran out of time for obtaining services mr though 
good job I did a rough plan at the start I guess
Original post by book worm
for the robbery what kinds of things did u put ?
I just said see above for the actus reus of theft, then went through each element briefly. I used the case of Dawson and James to say that a push was sufficient, then B and R for the D not being scared, and Lloyd/Hale to say continuing/ongoing appropriation
For the mens rea I just said see above, then said plus intent to using force, then just said how he pushed him so would have been intent
Original post by book worm
where was the 9 1b burglary ?
In scenario 2, he'd actually attempted to steal (don't have to succeed) and as soon as you attempt it transfers form 91a to 91b
91a is just an intent to commit the ulterior offence, like they're just thinking about it but they might get caught and decide not to, eg where they don't actually do it
91b is where they attempt or succeed in committing the ulterior offence, he'd attempted by grabbing the money, even though he dropped it
Did anyone do the first scenario on tort?
I got private nuisance, normal negligence and Rylands v Fletcher for the first question. Then the second question I got OLA 1957, medical negligence and vicarious liability thought it was a good paper, all the topics I didn't like were on the other scenario.
I got private nuisance, normal negligence and Rylands v Fletcher for the first question. Then the second question I got OLA 1957, medical negligence and vicarious liability
thought it was a good paper, all the topics I didn't like were on the other scenario.
Original post by Cryl
Awesome. Good luck with your other exams, if you have any.
Thanks you too!
I did Scenario 1 Offences Against Property.
I got for question 1 theft of the letter, blackmail and intoxication.
For question 2, I wrote false representation, basic criminal damage and aggravated criminal damage and burglary S9(1)(b).
Any else get that?
I got for question 1 theft of the letter, blackmail and intoxication.
For question 2, I wrote false representation, basic criminal damage and aggravated criminal damage and burglary S9(1)(b).
Any else get that?
Original post by musicandme
I did Scenario 1 Offences Against Property.
I got for question 1 theft of the letter, blackmail and intoxication.
For question 2, I wrote false representation, basic criminal damage and aggravated criminal damage and burglary S9(1)(b).
Any else get that?
I got for question 1 theft of the letter, blackmail and intoxication.
For question 2, I wrote false representation, basic criminal damage and aggravated criminal damage and burglary S9(1)(b).
Any else get that?
I got exactly that
Original post by lharto
For the second scenario 1st question I got theft, robbery, burglary, duress and 2nd question theft, fraud and obtaining services.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
For the second question what was the theft of?
Original post by Meganebaker
Did anyone do the first scenario on tort?
I got private nuisance, normal negligence and Rylands v Fletcher for the first question. Then the second question I got OLA 1957, medical negligence and vicarious liability thought it was a good paper, all the topics I didn't like were on the other scenario.
I got private nuisance, normal negligence and Rylands v Fletcher for the first question. Then the second question I got OLA 1957, medical negligence and vicarious liability
thought it was a good paper, all the topics I didn't like were on the other scenario.I did the second question on tort. I much prefer negligent misstatement to nuisance
Although when I went through both scenarios I got what you listed on the first one. Was there no public nuisance?Original post by musicandme
I did Scenario 1 Offences Against Property.
I got for question 1 theft of the letter, blackmail and intoxication.
For question 2, I wrote false representation, basic criminal damage and aggravated criminal damage and burglary S9(1)(b).
Any else get that?
I got for question 1 theft of the letter, blackmail and intoxication.
For question 2, I wrote false representation, basic criminal damage and aggravated criminal damage and burglary S9(1)(b).
Any else get that?
Exactly that.
Original post by lharto
For the second scenario 1st question I got theft, robbery, burglary, duress and 2nd question theft, fraud and obtaining services.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Warda3
Same, where was the theft :s
I had to rush the last question because i took waaaaay too much time on morals :P
Original post by Cheese man
In scenario 2, he'd actually attempted to steal (don't have to succeed) and as soon as you attempt it transfers form 91a to 91b
91a is just an intent to commit the ulterior offence, like they're just thinking about it but they might get caught and decide not to, eg where they don't actually do it
91b is where they attempt or succeed in committing the ulterior offence, he'd attempted by grabbing the money, even though he dropped it
91a is just an intent to commit the ulterior offence, like they're just thinking about it but they might get caught and decide not to, eg where they don't actually do it
91b is where they attempt or succeed in committing the ulterior offence, he'd attempted by grabbing the money, even though he dropped it
9 (1) (A) is where you enter as a trespasser, with the intention of committing the ulterior offence - whether you succeed or not. 9 (1) (B) is where, having entered as a trespasser (maybe by going into a prohibited area) you attempt to steal or actually steal. The question is, where was the intention to steal formed?
Quick Reply
Related discussions
- A-level Exam Discussions 2024
- GCSE Exam Discussions 2024
- A Level Exam Discussions 2023
- Over 500 questions on AQA Bio Unit 4 + Current Spec and old Spec papers + MS!
- A-level Business Study Group 2022-2023
- GCSE Exam Discussions 2023
- WELSH GCSE EXAMS - 2024 Discussion thread
- (AQA) A Level Law Notes + Study Group 📚💼
- AQA A Level Politics Paper 3 (7152/3) - 14th June 2024 [Exam Chat]
- Btec level 3 extended business dimploma
- AQA GCSE Geography Paper 3 (8035/3) - 14th June 2024 [Exam Chat]
- Tenancy transfer en-suite Stratford One London start June for Summer.
- GCSE Biology Study Group 2022-2023
- London Tenant Replacement for Summer at Student Accom
- GCSE 2023 Grade Boundaries (All Exam Boards)
- IAL repeats cash in.
- WJEC A-level English Literature Unit 4 (1720U40-1) - 14th June 2024 [Exam Chat]
- Contract Law
- btec applied science extended certificate aqa
- Go ahead in time as far as possible
Latest
Trending
Last reply 1 week ago
OCR A-level Law Paper 3 (H418/03) - 12th June 2023 [Exam Chat]Trending
Last reply 1 week ago
OCR A-level Law Paper 3 (H418/03) - 12th June 2023 [Exam Chat]
