The Student Room Group

OCR C4 (not mei) 18th June 2013 revision

Scroll to see replies

Reply 600
How many marks will I lose on the 9 marker for making an error at the very beginning of -k/root R rather than just k/root R? Absolutely hated that exam!
Reply 601
Original post by Vip3rgt9
...Forgot about the limits.


That's for x.. Pi/2 gives you cosx = 0
Original post by h2shin
Stationary points for the trig: (pi/2, 1) (pi/6, 1.5) (5pi/6, 1.5)
Any agreements?

Oh and gradient to left was negative and gradient to right was positive so I put minimum but can't be too sure...


Wow I feel stupid, I worked out gradient to left is negative, and right was positive and wrote that was a turning point! :angry:
For 8i), the differential equation.

I got the correct answer but didn't leave it as
Unparseable latex formula:

\[r]



Instead, when I got to
Unparseable latex formula:

\[{r^{\frac{3}{2}}}\ = (4.86t + 2.7)


I took the root by power 3/2 of the things on the right hand side so I got

r = 2.87t + 1.94

Will that still be okay?
Original post by JASApplications
For 8i), the differential equation.

I got the correct answer but didn't leave it as
Unparseable latex formula:

\[r]



Instead, when I got to
Unparseable latex formula:

\[{r^{\frac{3}{2}}}\ = (4.86t + 2.7)


I took the root by power 3/2 of the things on the right hand side so I got

r = 2.87t + 1.94

Will that still be okay?


for some reason in the bracket I got 27 rather than 2.7 :s
Reply 605
Original post by JASApplications
For 8i), the differential equation.

I got the correct answer but didn't leave it as
Unparseable latex formula:

\[r]



Instead, when I got to
Unparseable latex formula:

\[{r^{\frac{3}{2}}}\ = (4.86t + 2.7)


I took the root by power 3/2 of the things on the right hand side so I got

r = 2.87t + 1.94

Will that still be okay?


I think you will have dropped one or two marks because if you multiplied (4.86t+2.7)^2/3 it wouldn't give you that?


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 606
Original post by JakePreedy
I think that this would be okay because the question never specified what type of numbers "a" and "b" needed to be (i.e. rational, integer etc.) when in the form a ln(b).


Brilliant thankyou!


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 607
would you lose marks for leaving ur intergrated answer in terms of u, I got the right answer as most people but I just didn't sub back what u was? I hope they aren't that harsh :L
Original post by a10
would you lose marks for leaving ur intergrated answer in terms of u, I got the right answer as most people but I just didn't sub back what u was? I hope they aren't that harsh :L


Actually, why do you have to sub it back in anyway? You've stated what u equals.
Reply 609
Original post by Vip3rgt9
...Forgot about the limits.
EDIT: Cos(pi/2)=0


****, so iv lost 2 marks for not including the other two then :s-smilie:
Original post by a10
can someone confirm this:

for the tan question my final integral was


2ln(2sec2(x))-2ln(2- sec^2(x))

and I subbed in values wrong for the first part so I ended up with

(2ln2/3)+2ln(6+4root3) (-2 ln 2/3) + 2ln(-6+4root 3)

can someone confirm whether they got the -6+4 root 3 part?

Did exactly this. Integrated it wrong

Dunno how many marks we'll get, maybe 1 for 'putting limits in correctly'
and optimistically maybe 1 for 'using log rules correctly'
Reply 611
Original post by zmai
Thankyou!! I forgot to plug x values back in to find y values for question 4.

Would it be okay to write 1/2ln(root3) ? Did they specify the format?


Posted from TSR Mobile


I think you had to find the y-values but I doubt you'd lose more than 1 mark after finding the correct x-values.

I don't think they specified a format other than alnb so I think that would be fine
Reply 612
A* grade boundary anyone?
Original post by zmai
I think you will have dropped one or two marks because if you multiplied (4.86t+2.7)^2/3 it wouldn't give you that?


Posted from TSR Mobile


It does. 2.7^2/3 = 1.94 and 4.86^2/3 = 2.87
Reply 614
Really struggled, it was so difficult! Everyone seems to be finding it okay gah
Reply 615
Original post by Benjy100
My money is on 62-63


How many marks do you think you got Ben?
Reply 616
Original post by alastair999100
Did exactly this. Integrated it wrong

Dunno how many marks we'll get, maybe 1 for 'putting limits in correctly'
and optimistically maybe 1 for 'using log rules correctly'


why is the integral wrong? I differentiated it and got the tan2x fraction?
Reply 617
Original post by Maid Marian
I just can't believe I forgot what inversely proportional meant :facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

That's going to haunt me forever. 9 marks down the drain.

:banghead:

I did the same :frown:. Hopefully we pick up a method mark here or there. I'm sure we'll get a few for attempting to seperate the variables etc.
Sorry no I misread it ... Ignore this...
Reply 619
Original post by Benjy100
In the region of 65-69/72 I think (and hope) - but I'll be happy as long as I get an A (80/100 UMS) - you? :smile:


I think I have lost between 3-10 marks. This is me being hopeful. I just hope that I will have enough to get an A* overall in maths.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending