The Student Room Group

C4 Vectors

Scroll to see replies

Reply 20
Original post by zaback21
They simplified (-4,2,2) into the simplest ratio of (-2,1,1). (-4,2,2) = 2(-2,1,1). 2 is a scaler parameter that is included as multiple of u.

So, lets say r=(1,5,2) + t(-4,2,2) = (1,5,2) + u(-2,1,1)

u=2t


IMG_20130818_191627-1.jpg
How would I go about doing the last question there? I know it starts off as r=(3,2,-5).. But then what? The unknown there really puts me off and confuses me :frown:.
(edited 10 years ago)
Reply 21
Original post by krisshP
IMG_20130818_191627-1.jpg
How would I go about doing the last question there? I know it starts off as r=(3,2,-5).. But then what?


Look at the equation of the line that it has to be parallel to. This is r=i+3j+lambda*(......).

The bit in brackets gives you the direction.
Reply 22
Original post by krisshP
IMG_20130818_191627-1.jpg
How would I go about doing the last question there? I know it starts off as r=(3,2,-5).. But then what? The unknown there really puts me off and confuses me :frown:.


Rewrite the equation as:

r= i+ 3j + lambda ( 2i -4j + 5k)
Reply 23
Original post by BabyMaths
Look at the equation of the line that it has to be parallel to. This is r=i+3j+lambda*(......).

The bit in brackets gives you the direction.



Original post by zaback21
Rewrite the equation as:

r= i+ 3j + lambda ( 2i -4j + 5k)


That made me feel dumb :colondollar:

Now I got r=(3,2,-5) +lambda(2,-4,5) :smile:

Thanks :smile:
Reply 24
Original post by krisshP
That made me feel dumb :colondollar:

Now I got r=(3,2,-5) +lambda(2,-4,5) :smile:

Thanks :smile:


Asking never hurts. Now you will never make this mistake again. We all did when we first started learning. You just get better with practice.
Reply 25
Original post by zaback21
Asking never hurts. Now you will never make this mistake again. We all did when we first started learning. You just get better with practice.


Well said, it does feel a bit mind boggling with the vector forms of i, j and k stuff and lambda coming all at you and I couldn't see a way forward I was clueless. I guess I'll get much better with a lot of practice.

One must fail to learn I believe :rolleyes:
Reply 26
Original post by krisshP
Well said, it does feel a bit mind boggling with the vector forms of i, j and k stuff and lambda coming all at you and I couldn't see a way forward I was clueless. I guess I'll get much better with a lot of practice.

One must fail to learn I believe :rolleyes:


Haha take the Further Maths and you will see how interesting it gets in 3D Vector Space ( a must if you plan to study science, maths or engineering).
Reply 27
Original post by zaback21
Haha take the Further Maths and you will see how interesting it gets in 3D Vector Space ( a must if you plan to study science, maths or engineering).


Is that in A2 or at AS?
Reply 28
Original post by krisshP
Is that in A2 or at AS?

Its in FP1-FP3. Check the content. Most likely A2. But you can take them in AS too if you want I guess. Well I did. I took two Maths at A Level.
Reply 29
Original post by zaback21
X


find the angle in degrees between the vectors a=-8i+j+4k and b=6i+3j+6k

I got 105°. What did you get? My textbook says it is 75°, why?:confused:

Thanks
Reply 30
Original post by krisshP
find the angle in degrees between the vectors a=-8i+j+4k and b=6i+3j+6k

I got 105°. What did you get? My textbook says it is 75°, why?:confused:

Thanks


arccos(727)=105.026..\arccos \left(-\frac{7}{27}\right)=105.026.. degrees.

Did the question ask for the acute angle?
Reply 31
Original post by BabyMaths
arccos(727)=105.026..\arccos \left(-\frac{7}{27}\right)=105.026.. degrees.

Did the question ask for the acute angle?


Nope, a bit annoying :frown:

Anyway thanks
Reply 32
Original post by BabyMaths
X


IMG_20130819_200003-1.jpg
I feel so confused on this and I check it like 3 times:frown:

AB.AC=12z+26

|AB|=13

|AC|=√(z^2 + 40)

Cos60=1/2 from special triangles

(12z+26)/[13√(z^2 + 40)] = 1/2

2(12z+26)=13√(z^2 +40)

24z+52=√(169z^2 +6760)

576z^2 + 2704=169z^2 +6760

407z^2 - 4956=0

Using the quadratic formula gives me z=3.2 or z=-3.2 both to 2SF

Where did I go wrong? Textbook says z=1.33 or z=-7.47 :confused: WHY?

Thank you VERY much :smile:
Reply 33
Original post by krisshP
IMG_20130819_200003-1.jpg
I feel so confused on this and I check it like 3 times:frown:

AB.AC=12z+26

|AB|=13

|AC|=√(z^2 + 40)

Cos60=1/2 from special triangles

(12z+26)/[13√(z^2 + 40)] = 1/2

2(12z+26)=13√(z^2 +40)

24z+52=√(169z^2 +6760)

576z^2 + 2704=169z^2 +6760

407z^2 - 4956=0

Using the quadratic formula gives me z=3.2 or z=-3.2 both to 2SF

Where did I go wrong? Textbook says z=1.33 or z=-7.47 :confused: WHY?

Thank you VERY much :smile:


You made a mistake in the bold line. When you square (24z+52)^2, use (a+b)^2 formula=a^2+2ab+b^2

So, it should be 576z^2 +2496z+ 2704=169z^2 +6760
(edited 10 years ago)
Reply 34
Original post by zaback21
You made a mistake in the bold line. When you square (24z+52)^2, use (a+b)^2 formula=a^2+2ab+b^2

So, it should be 576z^2 +2496z+ 2704=169z^2 +6760


Okay, thanks. I feel really dumb now :colondollar:
Reply 35
Original post by BabyMaths
X


IMG_20130820_132349-1.jpg

Part a was fine for me and I got r=(4,-11,4)+lambda(1,4,1)

In part b I hit a brick wall. The dot product of MA and MO must be 0 as both vectors are perpendicular. So

x(x-4)+y(11+y)+z(z-4)=0

I only have 1 equation with 3 unknowns. It would be okay if I had to equations with 3 unknowns that an be solved simultaneously, but this isn't the case. :confused: help me out please


Thanks :smile:
Reply 36
Original post by krisshP
IMG_20130820_132349-1.jpg

Part a was fine for me and I got r=(4,-11,4)+lambda(1,4,1)

In part b I hit a brick wall. The dot product of MA and MO must be 0 as both vectors are perpendicular. So

x(x-4)+y(11+y)+z(z-4)=0

I only have 1 equation with 3 unknowns. It would be okay if I had to equations with 3 unknowns that an be solved simultaneously, but this isn't the case. :confused: help me out please


Thanks :smile:


OK OM\vec{OM}= 4 i -11j +4k + lambda(i + 4j + k)

The dot product of this with i+4j+k (the direction of AB) is 0.
Reply 37
Original post by krisshP
IMG_20130820_132349-1.jpg

Part a was fine for me and I got r=(4,-11,4)+lambda(1,4,1)

In part b I hit a brick wall. The dot product of MA and MO must be 0 as both vectors are perpendicular. So

x(x-4)+y(11+y)+z(z-4)=0

I only have 1 equation with 3 unknowns. It would be okay if I had to equations with 3 unknowns that an be solved simultaneously, but this isn't the case. :confused: help me out please


Thanks :smile:


Is the answer (6i,-3j,6k) ?
Reply 38
Original post by BabyMaths
OK OM\vec{OM}= 4 i -11j +4k + lambda(i + 4j + k)

The dot product of this with i+4j+k (the direction of AB) is 0.


Wow, that makes perfect sense. I didn't think of it like that. I got lambda=2 and then I got OM vector =(6, -3, 6) which is correct. :biggrin:


Thanks a lot! :smile:
Reply 39
Original post by zaback21
Is the answer (6i,-3j,6k) ?


Yep, I just got after using BabyMaths' advice.:smile:

Quick Reply

Latest