Oh, of course! If the mother wants to keep the child, then that's absolutely amazing! All I'm saying is, she should have an equal opportunity to fully explore her other options (e.g. abortion, adoption, foster care).
Another kettle of fish
.
Just bear in mind the fact that all of your actions to this day have had consequences: whether good, bad or neutral. And from this, you can deduce that everything you will ever do will have consequences too. The future belongs to those who shape it, right? I believe actions have consequences, but not so much that they should affect our behaviour: for instance, I only support the idea of predeterminism to the extent that people shouldn't think they can just kill someone with the excuse of ' it was Fate' or other divine intervention.
To apply it to abortion, for all we know, the abortion could've been a good thing. What if the child had to die in a wrecked car accident (per chance) 18 months after it was born? It would have ruined the mother's life completely... would it not be better to have the mother decide herself, if she thought it wise, that she couldn't support a child and needed an abortion before being faced with the above scenario? Both are occasions of severe grief and trauma, but which would you rather be in?