Hated football teams

Do you not feel it necessary to criticise them for that then?

The title of the thread is 'Hated football teams'. I hate Celtic and have given reasons for that.

Rangers went out of business. They weren't relegated, they went into administration and ceased to exist. A new club started up, originally named The Rangers (and later on dodgily allowed to change their name back, cause y'know, it's Rangers). This club was then dodgily admitted into the SFL division 3 despite not having 3 years worth of audited accounts (which is a requirement, but was obviously overlooked, cause y'know, it's Rangers). Spartans had a better case for being admitted into the league system, but that's a bit off the point.

You've spent a lot more time defending Rangers than talking about why you hate Celtic.

That's not true. I haven't 'defended' Rangers, I have just set some facts straight.

One problem with the Internet is that everyone assumes an equal level of intelligence.

I'm not going to allow a pseudo intellectual from the University of Bradford present an argument based entirely on lies.

Clearly you don't know if it's true or not. Rangers have a lot more success to their name than Celtic.

Celtic have won the European Cup...

I know.

That's got to be worth 30 SPLs

Don't be ridiculous. While an impressive achievement, Celtic winning the European Cup in 1967 isn't nearly as big an achievement as it would be now. That aside, you can't just pluck a number from thin air. I suspect you know nothing about the Scottish league, but I know you are no stranger to talking authoritatively on subjects you know nothing about.

Clearly you don't know if it's true or not. Rangers have a lot more success to their name than Celtic.

Actually it's well known to be false and based off the old idea of Celtic as a catholic club (which is pretty wrong - Celtic have never really adhered to the sectarianism - not to the same degree as rangers at any rate).

Do you actually read what people say? I said from the very beginning it was about the European cup victory: you can blabber on about spl titles all you want but the facts of the matter is Celtic have won the biggest prize in Europe, rangers haven't and rangers are bitter about that.

Oh, and the idea that it wasn't that big an achievement? look at who was involved in the tournament that year: Ajax as total football was getting going, division 1 champions Liverpool, Real Madrid - 5 successive la ligas with puskas in the side and inter Milan coached by Herrera with two successive serie a/European cups to their name? Smaller competition - certainly, but easier? No chance


Posted from TSR Mobile

Were you the guy who felt hed worked out a system for guaranteed gambling profits? You're still risking your own money, you're still taking odds from the bookies which dont properly compensate you for the risk youre taking and you're still running the risk of losing the head and chasing losses at some stage.

This is totally off topic. I make a living from betting, but there is no system to guarantee profit.

The part in bold doesn't make sense.

The odds correlate strongly to risk, but its not the real price. O/W bookies would make zero profit.
Do you arb then? That's not gambling.

If 10m mugs play roulette repeatedly 1000 times, each randomly deciding whether to bet between red/black each time then some after 1000 spins will have won 1000 times purely by luck. Maybe you happen to be in this subsection purely by luck, but you're not doing anything intelligent that's for sure

What has it got to do with Catholicism? The idea that 'Big Jock knew' exists because child abuse took place within Celtic Boys' Club.