Would you rather be rich and never find true love or be poor and find true love?

People always state how "money buys happiness" but I honestly think that to be utter bull****. You could have millions of money to last you centuries, but where's the happiness if you have no friends, family or lover. Money can't buy you those things.
I strongly believe that happiness is linked to love. Yes it may also be linked to success/fulfilment, but what is the point of achieving all your dreams if you've got no one to share it with?

In relation to the question, I would rather be poor and in love. Being in love gives you that feeling of security; you know there's someone out there who loves you and wants to be with you until you die, regardless of all the challenges you might face. I understand that being poor can lead to a lot of pressure and stress by trying to stay alive as you're economically in debt, but if you've got someone who you love and vice versa, then nothing should matter.
But if you're rich, and have no true love, you'll end up lonely. Money is just money. You can buy whatever you want, but they'll never give you the satisfaction that you get when someone loves you (at least not in my opinion). It's all materialistic love, and that doesn't last.

Am I just crazy or... ?

People always state how "money buys happiness" but I honestly think that to be utter bull****. You could have millions of money to last you centuries, but where's the happiness if you have no friends, family or lover. Money can't buy you those things.
I strongly believe that happiness is linked to love. Yes it may also be linked to success/fulfilment, but what is the point of achieving all your dreams if you've got no one to share it with?

In relation to the question, I would rather be poor and in love. Being in love gives you that feeling of security; you know there's someone out there who loves you and wants to be with you until you die, regardless of all the challenges you might face. I understand that being poor can lead to a lot of pressure and stress by trying to stay alive as you're economically in debt, but if you've got someone who you love and vice versa, then nothing should matter.
But if you're rich, and have no true love, you'll end up lonely. Money is just money. You can buy whatever you want, but they'll never give you the satisfaction that you get when someone loves you (at least not in my opinion). It's all materialistic love, and that doesn't last.

Am I just crazy or... ?

I think I'd rather be rich ...

I don't care about true love.

id rather have money

Money doesn't buy happiness.
Money is happiness.
I'd rather be rich and not find true love as I don't really believe in it and I think love is kinda overrated anyway. With money I can pursue my interests while having non-true love partners. Win-win.

People always state how "money buys happiness" but I honestly think that to be utter bull****. You could have millions of money to last you centuries, but where's the happiness if you have no friends, family or lover. Money can't buy you those things.
I strongly believe that happiness is linked to love. Yes it may also be linked to success/fulfilment, but what is the point of achieving all your dreams if you've got no one to share it with?

In relation to the question, I would rather be poor and in love. Being in love gives you that feeling of security; you know there's someone out there who loves you and wants to be with you until you die, regardless of all the challenges you might face. I understand that being poor can lead to a lot of pressure and stress by trying to stay alive as you're economically in debt, but if you've got someone who you love and vice versa, then nothing should matter.
But if you're rich, and have no true love, you'll end up lonely. Money is just money. You can buy whatever you want, but they'll never give you the satisfaction that you get when someone loves you (at least not in my opinion). It's all materialistic love, and that doesn't last.

Am I just crazy or... ?

Really Marian?! I didn't expect that from you







Money is happiness, but temporarily. Love is long-lasting! And come on, love isn't overrated. It's natural, everyone (or the majority) experiences platonic love during their lives at some point.

Would rather be poor and find true love. I would rather have someone by my side to go through good and bad times. Having little money doesn't mean you have to be unhappy

poor and find true love

as long as I've got some paper to do mathematics on I am happy with that

Unfortunately I have neither a lover nor money...

But give me true love.

Money doesn't buy happiness.
Money is happiness.
I'd rather be rich and not find true love as I don't really believe in it and I think love is kinda overrated anyway. With money I can pursue my interests while having non-true love partners. Win-win.

Really Marian?! I didn't expect that from you

I'd rather be poor and have love but why be a trade-off? Why not be both rich, and in love, haha .

Posted from TSR Mobile

I know plenty of rich blokes, and they are all blokes, who are ****ing miserable. Obviously it depends how you define rich, but these guys are all worth ten million plus.

That's naive.

Because a rich man would want chicks on his side-plate, he knows a rich position affords that privilige, have you not read the news that they (the rich (white) middle-aged men) do this often. Jude Law did it with his live-in nanny who was not pretty and he was with a beautiful actress wife.
You install all your emotion into this man and then he goes off on a dally with a womon considerably less better looking than you, that is a mug's game my love.

Money is happiness, but temporarily. Love is long-lasting! And come on, love isn't overrated. It's natural, everyone (or the majority) experiences platonic love during their lives at some point.