why are there almost no female libertarians?

Having alienated most of the men with their feminist poison they still need someone to look after them and pay for "their" children, namely the State.

Well, young people in general tend to lean left-wing. But as someone who's seen many of the various factions of the left, it tends to be the more socially libertarian ones that have more women in. While there are still usually more men, there are always quite a lot of women at anarchist events that I've been to, whereas the orthodox Marxist groups tend to be more male-dominated (though there are exceptions).

i was talking about ron paul libertarians types, not chomsky. the more american interpretation of it, with milton friedman and so on. not only the social aspects but economic as well : fiscal responsibility, smaller gov, lower or no income taxes etc.

very few women are into ideologies that encourage individuality and personal responsibility.

I know what you were talking about, just chipping in my two cents.

Tbh, I'd be very surprised if there weren't noticeably more young women in American-style libertarian organisations than in more conservative right-wing groups.

Could you try to make this point without using almost meaningless buzzwords?

Many women seem to find the state to be a more reliable "partner" than a possibly irresponsible man who is himself struggling to survive in very difficult economic circumstances.

and why are there so many young women left wing? pretty much every college age girl i know who is into politics is very left wing, a few are more conservative but i can't think of a single libertarian .

i used to talk to american supporters of ron paul and other US libertarians all the time a few years ago, almost none were female.

think of it like this: a society where the gov and the welfare state are huge, with very high taxes (a lot of europe but especially the nordic countries) - who benefits much more from it, men or women?

women are brought up to be empathetic, they empathise with those less fortunate more and therefore take the more empathetic political stance.

well that is my theory at least

Women tend to value security while men tend to value freedom. Women want large government to look after them while men want small government so they're left in peace. Women need the resources of men, but men have expectations of the women they provide for (e.g. be pretty and sweet), so women like voting for the government to tax men and steal their money at gunpoint to give to women, as they then have no expectations put upon them.

Women also tend to be more emotional while men tend to be more logical. Women are therefore more drawn to pie-in-the-sky ideas like fairness and equality, while men are more drawn to sensible ideas like fiscal responsibility - especially as men grow older and wiser.

As pointed out many young men are left wing, presumably because they a) are ignorant, b) aren't earning a high salary that will get taxed to hell, and c) are agreeing with women's left wing views in an attempt to sleep with them.

Of course, married women are more conservative, because they don't want their husbands being taxed so much.

so women being more caring than men is all societal?