The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Get rid of Scotland and we can prevent Labour Governments more easily!
Original post by euphful
The great thing about Scottish independence is that, if achieved, it will have been a free and fair referendum that is legal and just.

Nothing about what Russia is doing in Ukraine is comparable.


Posted from TSR Mobile


It's comparable,of course. Those Russians and Scottish people do love freedom.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by MatureStudent36
What makes you say that? Is it because that's what Alex Salmond wants?

The UK doesn't do currency unions. This has been seen with the fallout from the Euro zone crisis. It's been seen with the SNP doing a huge u turn on it's desire to embrace the €.

the argument that you're putting forward could be used to argue for the adoption of the €, yet time and time again the majority of the UK have said they don't want it.

although youre right in saying that it would weaken the rUK with the loss if oil revenues, this loss is more than made up by the relocation of Edinburgh's financial services sector which currently represents 10% of Scotland's GDP, down south.

youve also ignored the fact that the majority if the rUKs electorate don't want one. What would be left of the political parties have said they don't want one and the governor of the BoE has said its unlikely to be successful.


http://www.heraldscotland.com/mobile/politics/referendum-news/osbornes-case-against-currency-union-ripped-apart-by-top-economist.23757346

Don't remember the BoE governor saying it wouldn't work but happy to be corrected if you can show me his quotes.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/nov/26/scotland-share-uk-liabilities-currency-union-independence

Ok yes it's Nicola Sturgeon so could well be biased! :smile: but £60bn worth of goods is exported from the UK into Scotland and the rUK would have to suffer transaction costs through rejecting a currency union
Original post by skunkboy
It's comparable,of course. Those Russians and Scottish people do love freedom.

Posted from TSR Mobile


What do Scottish people need freedom from, Braveheart?


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by sauzee_4
http://www.heraldscotland.com/mobile/politics/referendum-news/osbornes-case-against-currency-union-ripped-apart-by-top-economist.23757346

Don't remember the BoE governor saying it wouldn't work but happy to be corrected if you can show me his quotes.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/nov/26/scotland-share-uk-liabilities-currency-union-independence

Ok yes it's Nicola Sturgeon so could well be biased! :smile: but £60bn worth of goods is exported from the UK into Scotland and the rUK would have to suffer transaction costs through rejecting a currency union


Scotland exports more to RUK than to the rest of the world. RUK exports more to the rest of the world than Scotland-so these transaction costs you talk of will impinge upon Scotland more than they will to RUK. RUK probably won't be too keen on doing much business with the country that has spent years insulting it and patronising it from across the border, either.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by sauzee_4
http://www.heraldscotland.com/mobile/politics/referendum-news/osbornes-case-against-currency-union-ripped-apart-by-top-economist.23757346

Don't remember the BoE governor saying it wouldn't work but happy to be corrected if you can show me his quotes.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/nov/26/scotland-share-uk-liabilities-currency-union-independence

Ok yes it's Nicola Sturgeon so could well be biased! :smile: but £60bn worth of goods is exported from the UK into Scotland and the rUK would have to suffer transaction costs through rejecting a currency union


The UK export $503 billion per year throughout the world. There transaction costs associated with that, but I still don't see much political appetite to reduce those 'transaction' costs to take on the €, $ or any other major currency like the yen, Rouble, Rupee or Remnimbi.

You should start advocating the reduction in transaction costs for Scotland to take on the €.


Nicola Sturgeon has form for making it up
as she goes along.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by Midlander
RUK probably won't be too keen on doing much business with the country that has spent years insulting it and patronising it from across the border, either.


Posted from TSR Mobile


:tongue: oh no, the nationalist think the rUK are going to do more business with Sottish because they are independent lmao (sarcasm)

:colone: However some students in the UK can't wait for their free education paid for by the Scottish Tax payer in 2016.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by sauzee_4
http://www.heraldscotland.com/mobile/politics/referendum-news/osbornes-case-against-currency-union-ripped-apart-by-top-economist.23757346

Don't remember the BoE governor saying it wouldn't work but happy to be corrected if you can show me his quotes.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/nov/26/scotland-share-uk-liabilities-currency-union-independence

Ok yes it's Nicola Sturgeon so could well be biased! :smile: but £60bn worth of goods is exported from the UK into Scotland and the rUK would have to suffer transaction costs through rejecting a currency union


Or it would just trade those goods elsewhere.

More than likely businesses would either force the Scottish government (unlikely to shift the rUK stance and the Scottish state would be weak and pliable) to drop those charges/lower them, or it'll simply refocus elsewhere leaving Scotland without that £60b claimed worth of goods.

It's a common economic meme to witness a so called local business shift away from said area with barely a second thought when the money flow decreases. Companies have loyalty to profit first, and local links somewhere in the middle if that.

Sometimes I feel like some people severely under-estimate how little influence and power Scotland will have to get it's own way. At least North Korea for all it's pariah state ways has a rickety nuke.
Original post by Studentus-anonymous
Or it would just trade those goods elsewhere.

More than likely businesses would either force the Scottish government (unlikely to shift the rUK stance and the Scottish state would be weak and pliable) to drop those charges/lower them, or it'll simply refocus elsewhere leaving Scotland without that £60b claimed worth of goods.

It's a common economic meme to witness a so called local business shift away from said area with barely a second thought when the money flow decreases. Companies have loyalty to profit first, and local links somewhere in the middle if that.

Sometimes I feel like some people severely under-estimate how little influence and power Scotland will have to get it's own way. At least North Korea for all it's pariah state ways has a rickety nuke.


I'd have said that that underestimate is due to a severe lack of knowledge of economics.
Reply 9009
Original post by Midlander
RUK probably won't be too keen on doing much business with the country that has spent years insulting it and patronising it from across the border, either.Posted from TSR Mobile


I wonder if all the Scottish Unionists on this forum look at Midlander's posts and agree with him, or can they simply not bring themselves to argue with a fellow NO man?
How Scotland has been insulting and patronising the rUK for years is beyond me, or at least any more insulting and patronising than England has been to Scotland!

A quote from Andrew Wilson in Scotland on Sunday (a Unionist rag) seems apt on this occasion....
"What England needs to hear is the truth. And that truth is that this vote is not about them or our attitude to them. It is about us and our attitude to ourselves. In psychological terms we are not seeking to move “away from” anyone. Rather we are moving “towards” ourselves."
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by Boab

A quote from Andrew Wilson in Scotland on Sunday (a Unionist rag) seems apt on this occasion....
"What England needs to hear is the truth. And that truth is that this vote is not about them or our attitude to them. It is about us and our attitude to ourselves. In psychological terms we are not seeking to move “away from” anyone. Rather we are moving “towards” ourselves."


But that is not the message we are getting. iScotland supporters moan that the no campaign is negative, but in fact they are just as bad as they constantly witter about escaping Westminster's yoke. It is tedious.
Original post by Boab
I wonder if all the Scottish Unionists on this forum look at Midlander's posts and agree with him, or can they simply not bring themselves to argue with a fellow NO man?
How Scotland has been insulting and patronising the rUK for years is beyond me, or at least any more insulting and patronising than England has been to Scotland!

A quote from Andrew Wilson in Scotland on Sunday (a Unionist rag) seems apt on this occasion....
"What England needs to hear is the truth. And that truth is that this vote is not about them or our attitude to them. It is about us and our attitude to ourselves. In psychological terms we are not seeking to move “away from” anyone. Rather we are moving “towards” ourselves."


There does seem to be a awful lot of anti English rhetoric. Veiled admittedly, but it's there.
Reply 9012
Original post by Good bloke
But that is not the message we are getting. iScotland supporters moan that the no campaign is negative, but in fact they are just as bad as they constantly witter about escaping Westminster's yoke. It is tedious.


We don't moan that it's too negative, we rejoice in the fact, as it's going to help us win!

The YES campaign is more and more being led not by the politicians but by grass roots campaigns. You can find discussions being held all over Scotland every day, and it isn't the politicians who are addressing these audiences, it is the public.

We talk of what Scotland can achieve, not about Westminster!
Original post by Boab
I wonder if all the Scottish Unionists on this forum look at Midlander's posts and agree with him, or can they simply not bring themselves to argue with a fellow NO man?
How Scotland has been insulting and patronising the rUK for years is beyond me, or at least any more insulting and patronising than England has been to Scotland!

A quote from Andrew Wilson in Scotland on Sunday (a Unionist rag) seems apt on this occasion....
"What England needs to hear is the truth. And that truth is that this vote is not about them or our attitude to them. It is about us and our attitude to ourselves. In psychological terms we are not seeking to move “away from” anyone. Rather we are moving “towards” ourselves."


There are incessant comparisons about anything and everything with the corresponding state of affairs in RUK or England. Examples:

Child poverty, crime, the economy, higher education, the environment, social equality, social awareness, Conservative voting trends, the electoral system and so on and so on. Everything is claimed to be better in Scotland than in RUK and it comes across as incredibly condescending.

And that is before we get on to the more explicit Anglophobic ramblings of certain individuals.


Posted from TSR Mobile
So Mr Salmond wants Scotland to leave the United Kingdom, but join the European Union. That is not independence.
Reply 9015
Original post by MatureStudent36
There does seem to be a awful lot of anti English rhetoric. Veiled admittedly, but it's there.


We are 'separating' from England as the Unionist politicians like to put it. how on earth would it be possible for nobody to claim there was some anti-English element? Simply impossible!
Original post by Boab
We are 'separating' from England as the Unionist politicians like to put it. how on earth would it be possible for nobody to claim there was some anti-English element? Simply impossible!


I've seen too many SNP supporters driven by something more sinister. You only have to look at the ramblings of Maths Tutor to see that.

It's the down side of identity politics. If you ain't one of is, you're one of them. That's we the fruit loons like settler watch come out to play.
Reply 9017
Original post by Midlander
There are incessant comparisons about anything and everything with the corresponding state of affairs in RUK or England. Examples:

Child poverty, crime, the economy, higher education, the environment, social equality, social awareness, Conservative voting trends, the electoral system and so on and so on. Everything is claimed to be better in Scotland than in RUK and it comes across as incredibly condescending.


And EVERY argument from Unionist politicians is comparing how we are better together and would be worse off independent.
It comes across as incredibly condescending!

Maybe if you open your eyes you will see there are two sides to this debate.
Reply 9018
Original post by MatureStudent36
I've seen too many SNP supporters driven by something more sinister. You only have to look at the ramblings of Maths Tutor to see that.

It's the down side of identity politics. If you ain't one of is, you're one of them. That's we the fruit loons like settler watch come out to play.


The ramblings of Maths Tutor are sinister? :confused:

You may not agree with them, but if this is what you class as sinister, your argument is defunct!
Original post by Boab
And EVERY argument from Unionist politicians is comparing how we are better together and would be worse off independent.
It comes across as incredibly condescending!

Maybe if you open your eyes you will see there are two sides to this debate.


Another straw man. Read the minutes of meetings at Holyrood, you even get some MSPs saying that incessant comparisons with England get tedious. And that England are the ones who get mentioned instead of RUK, they have a point.


Posted from TSR Mobile

Latest

Trending

Trending