The Student Room Group
Competition - post a photo you've taken of nature >>
Competition - post a photo you've taken of nature >>
Competition - post a photo you've taken of nature >>

TSR Tennis Society IV

Scroll to see replies

Reply 600
Avatar for Badshah
Badshah
Original post by ubi1
Nadal overtakes Lendl :

Federer = (17 x 2) + (6 x 1.4) + (7 x 1.2) + (21 x 1) = 71.8

Nadal = (13 x 2) + (0 x 1.4) + (6 x 1.2) + (27 x 1) = 60.2

Lendl = (8 x 2) + ((5 + 1) x 1.4)) + (11 x 1.2) + (22 x 1) = 59.6


How do you work this out?
Reply 601
Avatar for ubi1
ubi1
14
Original post by Roger1
How do you work this out?

Its slams, WTF titles, slam finals, and masters.:smile:
Reply 602
Avatar for Badshah
Badshah
It seems that no one here cares much about women's tennis. My Maria Sharapova wins her 31st title. She is the queen of clay except when she is facing Serena.
Reply 603
Avatar for ubi1
ubi1
14
Original post by Roger1
It seems that no one here cares much about women's tennis. My Maria Sharapova wins her 31st title. She is the queen of clay except when she is facing Serena.

Oi not yours my Maria!:angry:

I was thinking of puting some money on her but it was risky so went for Nadal:wink:
Reply 604
Avatar for Badshah
Badshah
Original post by ubi1
Its slams, WTF titles, slam finals, and masters.:smile:


Oh I get it, Thanks. :smile: Where is Novak on that list?
Reply 605
Avatar for Badshah
Badshah
So are Federer and Novak playing Rome or not? Nadal will still win.
Reply 606
Avatar for ubi1
ubi1
14
Original post by Roger1
Oh I get it, Thanks. :smile: Where is Novak on that list?


Federer = (17 x 2) + (6 x 1.4) + (7 x 1.2) + (21 x 1) = 71.8

Nadal = (13 x 2) + (0 x 1.4) + (6 x 1.2) + (27 x 1) = 60.2

Lendl = (8 x 2) + ((5 + 1) x 1.4)) + (11 x 1.2) + (22 x 1) = 59.6

Sampras = (14 x 2) + ((5 + 1) x 1.4) + (4 x 1.2) + (11 x 1) = 52.2

McEnroe (7 x 2) + ((3 + 4) x 1.4)) + (4 x 1.2) + (19 x 1) = 47.6

Borg = (11 x 2) + ((2 + 1) x 1.4)) + (5 x 1.2) + (15 x 1) = 47.2

Connors = (8 x 2) + ((1 + 2) x 1.4)) + (7 x 1.2) + (17 x 1) = 45.6

Agassi = (8 x 2) + (1 x 1.4) + (7 x 1.2) + (17 x 1) = 42.8

Djokovic = (6 x 2) + (3 x 1.4) + (6 x 1.2) + (18 x 1) = 41.4

Becker = (6 x 2) + ((3 + 1 + 1) x 1.4)) + (4 x 1.2) + (13 x 1) = 36.8

Edberg = (6 x 2) + (1 x 1.4) + (5 x 1.2) + (8 x 1) = 27.4

Wilander = (7 x 2) + (0 x 1.4) + (4 x 1.2) + (8 x 1) = 26.8
Reply 607
Avatar for ubi1
ubi1
14
Original post by Roger1
So are Federer and Novak playing Rome or not? Nadal will still win.

Novak is but unsure about Federer. Nadal won't beat Nole in this form?:frown:
Reply 608
Avatar for Badshah
Badshah
Original post by ubi1
Federer = (17 x 2) + (6 x 1.4) + (7 x 1.2) + (21 x 1) = 71.8

Nadal = (13 x 2) + (0 x 1.4) + (6 x 1.2) + (27 x 1) = 60.2

Lendl = (8 x 2) + ((5 + 1) x 1.4)) + (11 x 1.2) + (22 x 1) = 59.6

Sampras = (14 x 2) + ((5 + 1) x 1.4) + (4 x 1.2) + (11 x 1) = 52.2

McEnroe (7 x 2) + ((3 + 4) x 1.4)) + (4 x 1.2) + (19 x 1) = 47.6

Borg = (11 x 2) + ((2 + 1) x 1.4)) + (5 x 1.2) + (15 x 1) = 47.2

Connors = (8 x 2) + ((1 + 2) x 1.4)) + (7 x 1.2) + (17 x 1) = 45.6

Agassi = (8 x 2) + (1 x 1.4) + (7 x 1.2) + (17 x 1) = 42.8

Djokovic = (6 x 2) + (3 x 1.4) + (6 x 1.2) + (18 x 1) = 41.4

Becker = (6 x 2) + ((3 + 1 + 1) x 1.4)) + (4 x 1.2) + (13 x 1) = 36.8

Edberg = (6 x 2) + (1 x 1.4) + (5 x 1.2) + (8 x 1) = 27.4

Wilander = (7 x 2) + (0 x 1.4) + (4 x 1.2) + (8 x 1) = 26.8


Thanks. Nadal will probably be top before he retires.
Reply 609
Avatar for Badshah
Badshah
Original post by ubi1
Novak is but unsure about Federer. Nadal won't beat Nole in this form?:frown:


Except the final, Nadal played quite well imo. Novak won't be 100% anyway, so Nadal can beat him if he plays well.
Reply 610
Avatar for ubi1
ubi1
14
Original post by Roger1
Thanks. Nadal will probably be top before he retires.

Yes I predicted when Nadal was on 50 points that he will get to 60 end of 2013 and he did now I predict Nadal gets to 70 points by the end of 2015 or even before if he starts winning more slams and masters.
Reply 611
Avatar for ubi1
ubi1
14
Original post by Roger1
Except the final, Nadal played quite well imo. Novak won't be 100% anyway, so Nadal can beat him if he plays well.

Novak has Federer in his draw:wink:.

And Nads has Murray in quarters and Stan in semis going to be tough:colondollar:
Reply 612
Avatar for ubi1
ubi1
14
Rafa is No.1 in race to London finally he should have been first in IW but oh well.
Should the WTF not be X 1.5 rather than 1.4.

I suspect Fed will continue to add WFT and Masters to his total.
Reply 614
Avatar for Badshah
Badshah
Original post by ubi1
Novak has Federer in his draw:wink:.

And Nads has Murray in quarters and Stan in semis going to be tough:colondollar:


Murray on clay ain't tough, definitely not with his current form. Lol!
Reply 615
Avatar for ubi1
ubi1
14
Original post by Rakas21
Should the WTF not be X 1.5 rather than 1.4.

I suspect Fed will continue to add WFT and Masters to his total.

One of Feds WTF he lost a match before winning it!:tongue:
Reply 616
Avatar for ubi1
ubi1
14
Original post by Roger1
Murray on clay ain't tough, definitely not with his current form. Lol!

Yes but Nadal got lucky today and tbh he looked lost in the first set 1 today:redface: Murray can trouble Rafa.
Reply 617
Avatar for Badshah
Badshah
Original post by ubi1
One of Feds WTF he lost a match before winning it!:tongue:


That was 2007 to Gonzo.

Original post by ubi1
Yes but Nadal got lucky today and tbh he looked lost in the first set 1 today:redface: Murray can trouble Rafa.


You ain't serious. Murray is not troubling Nadal on clay. He won't even reach him most likely.
Original post by Roger1
That was 2007 to Gonzo.



You ain't serious. Murray is not troubling Nadal on clay. He won't even reach him most likely.


Especially with his form-his lack of coach seems to be having an effect

Posted from TSR Mobile
& it will be Murray against Nadal!!!

Quick Reply

Related discussions

Latest

Trending

Trending

Articles for you