The Student Room Group

**********OFFICIAL OCR ECONOMICS F581 13th MAY 2014 THREAD************

Scroll to see replies

Original post by MrHogwash
I wrote that since YED is inelastic and positive(0.2), a 10% increase in consumers real income would lead to a 2% increase in the demand for that good. This shows that it is a normal good. If YED was negative however, then demand would fall by 2%


Yeah i accidentally said it was an inferior good :/ lol

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by littleman72
We need to ask Mr E I hope you're right 3 marks resting on it... surely they are as advertising causes tastes and fashion.


Yeah we do :/ so confused now
lol could have lost 3 marks. My teacher taught it as separate. For example say the good was tea. Tastes and fashion may have changed to make drinking coffee more unpopular and tea a better drink. Whereas advertising helps persuade consumers to start drinking tea? Do you get my drift lol
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by chelseafan
That Chinese externality question was weird.


Lol it was! Didn't know how to answer it :/

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by ItsJustMe17
Yeah i accidentally said it was an inferior good :/ lol

Posted from TSR Mobile


Do u rmb how many mark for that question? I think I've done the calculation incorrectly :frown:


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by May-o2q
Do u rmb how many mark for that question? I think I've done the calculation incorrectly :frown:


Posted from TSR Mobile


I think it was 6 or 8.
2 marks for the calculation, and 3 marks for what this figure suggests or something. Pretty sure yed was +0.2

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by BlueArmy-CFC
2 marks for the calculation, and 3 marks for what this figure suggests or something. Pretty sure yed was +0.2

Posted from TSR Mobile


Yeah. It was 0.2.
I shifted demand instead of demand and supply how many marks out of 6 would I get?
Original post by BlueArmy-CFC
2 marks for the calculation, and 3 marks for what this figure suggests or something. Pretty sure yed was +0.2

Posted from TSR Mobile



yep. it was -2/-10=+0.2
Original post by FredRussell97
I shifted demand instead of demand and supply how many marks out of 6 would I get?



Me too. for the second diagram, I only moved the demand curve and let supplyconstant. I assumed this due to James May's TV show. How many marks would I lose?
(edited 9 years ago)
Hmmm, i think you would lose a chunk of the marks as you would need to say what this does to the market. I'd say around 2/6 or 3/6

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by MrHogwash
I think it was 6 or 8.


I hope it's 6. Yea, it should have been 0.2 it's my mistake. I feel so silly now. I shouldn't have made such a lame mistake really.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by May-o2q
I hope it's 6. Yea, it should have been 0.2 it's my mistake. I feel so silly now. I shouldn't have made such a lame mistake really.


Posted from TSR Mobile


I too had a hard time figuring out what to write, +0.2 or -0.2. Just went with +0.2 luckily.
Original post by BlueArmy-CFC
Hmmm, i think you would lose a chunk of the marks as you would need to say what this does to the market. I'd say around 2/6 or 3/6

Posted from TSR Mobile


Nice one lad at least it's something!
Original post by May-o2q
I hope it's 6. Yea, it should have been 0.2 it's my mistake. I feel so silly now. I shouldn't have made such a lame mistake really.


Posted from TSR Mobile


No sir you shouldn't have made such a lame mistake :colondollar:
What about for the specialisation question saying that the firm couldn't access all their market because of only concentrating on a few products?- disadvantage
Original post by BlueArmy-CFC
Hmmm, i think you would lose a chunk of the marks as you would need to say what this does to the market. I'd say around 2/6 or 3/6

Posted from TSR Mobile


Of course I did. " Quantity demanded increased from Q to Q1. Demand curve shifted to the right along the supply curve. New equilibrium at E1. The extent of change depends on the price elasticity of supply."
(edited 9 years ago)
You didn't have to say however, as the question didn't say comment

Posted from TSR Mobile
For the 18 marker, could you have talked about environmental taxes...this is different from indirect tax right?

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by FredRussell97
What about for the specialisation question saying that the firm couldn't access all their market because of only concentrating on a few products?- disadvantage



Textbook definition of specialisation: Division of Labour, a process whereby the production process is broken down into a sequence of stages, and workers are assigned to particular stages.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending