Gender was crazy but categorising texts was actual hell. I done pragmatics humour and to inform, I had terrible timing. So yeah. I think I'm retaking next year
What did you put? Mine didn't not sound sophisticated or clever at all but instead a waffle
I'm quite embarrassed to say it! It's absolute waffle mine is!
I said women were portrayed as if they're machines. The shopping experience and the woman together is represented as if it's a game because of the word 'mission'.
And then the part about the woman asking the opinion and then comparing the man to a middle east envoy - I said it portrayed woman as animalistic lol! Is that even a word?!
My examiners just going to laugh when he/she looks at my paper!
I slept like 3 and half hours which was a really bad idea!
Grouping was hard - I only did two groups. I didn't get Text G - it was confusing what it was saying.
I don't think I talked about the effect on the reader enough, and I was grouping texts together for example A, B and C for imperatives (this is just an example, I can;t remember what texts A, B + C were) and then halfway through the paragraph I'd say something like: Text B uses deictic language and then I'd just say Text D also uses deictic language (even though I didn't mention it in my initial grouping). IDK if this is allowed :-(
I'm quite embarrassed to say it! It's absolute waffle mine is!
I said women were portrayed as if they're machines. The shopping experience and the woman together is represented as if it's a game because of the word 'mission'.
And then the part about the woman asking the opinion and then comparing the man to a middle east envoy - I said it portrayed woman as animalistic lol! Is that even a word?!
My examiners just going to laugh when he/she looks at my paper!
those aren't bad points at all. they were portrayed as machines 'programmed' and also as animalistic (which is a word). I talked about the extended metaphor of war as opposed to a game though like the middle east bit, then at the end it said 'patience and tact'
I don't think I talked about the effect on the reader enough, and I was grouping texts together for example A, B and C for imperatives (this is just an example, I can;t remember what texts A, B + C were) and then halfway through the paragraph I'd say something like: Text B uses deictic language and then I'd just say Text D also uses deictic language (even though I didn't mention it in my initial grouping). IDK if this is allowed :-(
Yes they're allowed as you're overlapping which the examiners like. You probably didn't do as bad as you think. It's done - you tried your best.
those aren't bad points at all. they were portrayed as machines 'programmed' and also as animalistic (which is a word). I talked about the extended metaphor of war as opposed to a game though like the middle east bit, then at the end it said 'patience and tact'
Yes - war would be a better comparison due to the words as machines can come into that! Thank God it's a word! You've made me feel so much better! - thank you!
Those were probably my best points then the other bits I can't even remember I felt very limited on what I could say.