The Student Room Group
Competition - post a photo you've taken of nature >>
Uni students - Complete our survey >>
Competition - post a photo you've taken of nature >>
Uni students - Complete our survey >>

This discussion is now closed.

Check out other Related discussions

The Arsenal Thread XIX

Scroll to see replies

Original post by hello101010
Nah, not just for that. Mata is better in general, 129 goals/assists in 226 appearances compared to Cazorla's 108 in 320.

Plus Fifa ratings never lie


Huh 129 goals? :lolwut: :lol:, it say in his career he has only scored 95. Either you're lying or I'm lying.

Looool come on now let's not judge players based on Fifa.
Original post by Kruz
Huh 129 goals? :lolwut: :lol:, it say in his career he has only scored 95. Either you're lying or I'm lying.


129 goals and assists combined, according to transfermarkt

Was only semi srs about fifa
(edited 9 years ago)
Adrian Durham is such a bitter little ****.
Original post by Peggles_*
HE'S GOING!!

Bun him, Szcz will put on a front about how him not playing won't affect him but it will. He needs to get rid of the Birmingham hoodoo that is still hanging over him.


you can't expect such a quality keeper to be content being 2nd in a team tbh
Original post by Luke_Mckeown
you can't expect such a quality keeper to be content being 2nd in a team tbh


tell that to Casillas
Original post by Luke_Mckeown
you can't expect such a quality keeper to be content being 2nd in a team tbh


I wasn't.


:colonhash::
Original post by AR_95
**** me noooo i have ****ing tuition during the final ffs i'll miss the first half nooooo


you guys make it hard for yourselves anyway, so i wouldn't expect a goal until the 80th minute :wink:
will be a hull goal.
then you'll score 87 and 89 for the win...

Original post by Kruz
come on now let's not judge players based on Fifa.


sterling is 75 on the new world cup game.
pretty sure FIFA ratings can lie...
Original post by heiljoe
tell that to Casillas


hahaaa, fair enough

the difference is that casillas is 32 and fabianski is 29
casillas is in the middle, or maybe even towards the end of his good years
fabianksi is still getting better, probably hasn't even reached his peak yet.
Original post by Luke_Mckeown
hahaaa, fair enough

the difference is that casillas is 32 and fabianski is 29
casillas is in the middle, or maybe even towards the end of his good years
fabianksi is still getting better, probably hasn't even reached his peak yet.


Fabianski is far from a solid keeper compared to the lucks of Schezer Casillas or anyone he's not comparable and has been massively helped by our defence

He's a good keeper, but a back up for us at best. He's quite clumsy however this season (only being in the FA cup mostly anyway) he has been excellent but this is just one good season.

A smaller team would fit him though (to start), it's a shame since now we're lacking a good back up GK
Original post by AR_95
Fabianski is far from a solid keeper compared to the lucks of Schezer Casillas or anyone he's not comparable and has been massively helped by our defence

He's a good keeper, but a back up for us at best. He's quite clumsy however this season (only being in the FA cup mostly anyway) he has been excellent but this is just one good season.

A smaller team would fit him though (to start), it's a shame since now we're lacking a good back up GK


oh no, i wouldn't compare him quality wise to casillas; somebody else mentioned him, and i was just going from an age perspective.

the thing about him is that he can have a random game where he is superhuman.
like against us in the FA cup - we should've won that about 6-2, but we lost 2-1 because of him.:s-smilie:

he'd be great at a mid-tabled team imo

true, but then imagine how we feel; we don't even have a consistent starting keeper.
Original post by Luke_Mckeown
you guys make it hard for yourselves anyway, so i wouldn't expect a goal until the 80th minute :wink:
will be a hull goal.
then you'll score 87 and 89 for the win...



sterling is 75 on the new world cup game.
pretty sure FIFA ratings can lie...



Yeah we should make Sterling 90 on the basis of this season.
Original post by Luke_Mckeown
hahaaa, fair enough

the difference is that casillas is 32 and fabianski is 29
casillas is in the middle, or maybe even towards the end of his good years
fabianksi is still getting better, probably hasn't even reached his peak yet.


Tell that to Neuer. (28)
Original post by Kruz
Yeah we should make Sterling 90 on the basis of this season.


not sure if you're typically trolling or not :tongue:

fair enough that he was 76 on FIFA 14 when the season started, because nobody knew hoe well we and him would do.
but after how he's played, in their new world cup game release, he has actually gone down (75) than up?

logic...

Original post by heiljoe
Tell that to Neuer. (28)


neuer isn't even human.
he doesn't count.
Sagna to score the winner at 88 mins in the final, and the crowd to erupt singing:
When a rich ***** want ya
And your ***** can't do nothing for ya
These hoes ain't loyal
These hoes ain't loyal
Yeah, yeah, let me see
Original post by Luke_Mckeown
not sure if you're typically trolling or not :tongue:

fair enough that he was 76 on FIFA 14 when the season started, because nobody knew hoe well we and him would do.
but after how he's played, in their new world cup game release, he has actually gone down (75) than up?

logic...



neuer isn't even human.
he doesn't count.



Loool nah I was trolling, yeah he should get an increase he's had a great season. I think 80 or 81 would be good for him.
Original post by Kruz
Loool nah I was trolling, yeah he should get an increase he's had a great season. I think 80 or 81 would be good for him.


definitely - i'm hoping that on FIFA15 he is somewhere around 80-82

the problem is that he will still be 19
a 19 year old on fifa rated 81 would become the best player in the world according to their growth rules.
everybody would be buying him; maybe they don't feel he's good enough for that so they're keeping his rating low on purpose?
Original post by Luke_Mckeown
definitely - i'm hoping that on FIFA15 he is somewhere around 80-82

the problem is that he will still be 19
a 19 year old on fifa rated 81 would become the best player in the world according to their growth rules.
everybody would be buying him; maybe they don't feel he's good enough for that so they're keeping his rating low on purpose?


Yeah tbh I don't really know how EA does their rating system.
Original post by Kruz
Yeah tbh I don't really know how EA does their rating system.


it isn;t easy to be fair
their main problem is when a seemingly average player has an amazing season.
they can't change his rating too much or else they will look rubbish for him being so much better than they predicted

so all they do is change it on the next game - you'll probably see liverpool players shoot right up next year (henderson, sterling, etc..)
not sure if we would be 5 star or not though
we came 2nd, but i don't think we have strong enough players to be rated 5 star
Original post by SHOO
Lol they need a reason to hate. You should know this by now

Even if we win, people will say "ah it's only the FA cup, you ain't won **** in 9 years, you're a small club, you don't know how to win big games, you won it via match fixing - YNWA, UTID" etc


Lol i know i should be used to it but people are just irrational..they love to hate us :smile:
What is this 'following' thing. Meant to ask. What does it do? Does it just mean you are their friend?

Related discussions

Latest

Trending

Trending

Articles for you