Bun him, Szcz will put on a front about how him not playing won't affect him but it will. He needs to get rid of the Birmingham hoodoo that is still hanging over him.
you can't expect such a quality keeper to be content being 2nd in a team tbh
**** me noooo i have ****ing tuition during the final ffs i'll miss the first half nooooo
you guys make it hard for yourselves anyway, so i wouldn't expect a goal until the 80th minute will be a hull goal. then you'll score 87 and 89 for the win...
the difference is that casillas is 32 and fabianski is 29 casillas is in the middle, or maybe even towards the end of his good years fabianksi is still getting better, probably hasn't even reached his peak yet.
the difference is that casillas is 32 and fabianski is 29 casillas is in the middle, or maybe even towards the end of his good years fabianksi is still getting better, probably hasn't even reached his peak yet.
Fabianski is far from a solid keeper compared to the lucks of Schezer Casillas or anyone he's not comparable and has been massively helped by our defence
He's a good keeper, but a back up for us at best. He's quite clumsy however this season (only being in the FA cup mostly anyway) he has been excellent but this is just one good season.
A smaller team would fit him though (to start), it's a shame since now we're lacking a good back up GK
Fabianski is far from a solid keeper compared to the lucks of Schezer Casillas or anyone he's not comparable and has been massively helped by our defence
He's a good keeper, but a back up for us at best. He's quite clumsy however this season (only being in the FA cup mostly anyway) he has been excellent but this is just one good season.
A smaller team would fit him though (to start), it's a shame since now we're lacking a good back up GK
oh no, i wouldn't compare him quality wise to casillas; somebody else mentioned him, and i was just going from an age perspective.
the thing about him is that he can have a random game where he is superhuman. like against us in the FA cup - we should've won that about 6-2, but we lost 2-1 because of him.
he'd be great at a mid-tabled team imo
true, but then imagine how we feel; we don't even have a consistent starting keeper.
you guys make it hard for yourselves anyway, so i wouldn't expect a goal until the 80th minute will be a hull goal. then you'll score 87 and 89 for the win...
sterling is 75 on the new world cup game. pretty sure FIFA ratings can lie...
Yeah we should make Sterling 90 on the basis of this season.
the difference is that casillas is 32 and fabianski is 29 casillas is in the middle, or maybe even towards the end of his good years fabianksi is still getting better, probably hasn't even reached his peak yet.
Yeah we should make Sterling 90 on the basis of this season.
not sure if you're typically trolling or not
fair enough that he was 76 on FIFA 14 when the season started, because nobody knew hoe well we and him would do. but after how he's played, in their new world cup game release, he has actually gone down (75) than up?
Sagna to score the winner at 88 mins in the final, and the crowd to erupt singing: When a rich ***** want ya And your ***** can't do nothing for ya These hoes ain't loyal These hoes ain't loyal Yeah, yeah, let me see
fair enough that he was 76 on FIFA 14 when the season started, because nobody knew hoe well we and him would do. but after how he's played, in their new world cup game release, he has actually gone down (75) than up?
logic...
neuer isn't even human. he doesn't count.
Loool nah I was trolling, yeah he should get an increase he's had a great season. I think 80 or 81 would be good for him.
Loool nah I was trolling, yeah he should get an increase he's had a great season. I think 80 or 81 would be good for him.
definitely - i'm hoping that on FIFA15 he is somewhere around 80-82
the problem is that he will still be 19 a 19 year old on fifa rated 81 would become the best player in the world according to their growth rules. everybody would be buying him; maybe they don't feel he's good enough for that so they're keeping his rating low on purpose?
definitely - i'm hoping that on FIFA15 he is somewhere around 80-82
the problem is that he will still be 19 a 19 year old on fifa rated 81 would become the best player in the world according to their growth rules. everybody would be buying him; maybe they don't feel he's good enough for that so they're keeping his rating low on purpose?
Yeah tbh I don't really know how EA does their rating system.
Yeah tbh I don't really know how EA does their rating system.
it isn;t easy to be fair their main problem is when a seemingly average player has an amazing season. they can't change his rating too much or else they will look rubbish for him being so much better than they predicted
so all they do is change it on the next game - you'll probably see liverpool players shoot right up next year (henderson, sterling, etc..) not sure if we would be 5 star or not though we came 2nd, but i don't think we have strong enough players to be rated 5 star
Lol they need a reason to hate. You should know this by now
Even if we win, people will say "ah it's only the FA cup, you ain't won **** in 9 years, you're a small club, you don't know how to win big games, you won it via match fixing - YNWA, UTID" etc
Lol i know i should be used to it but people are just irrational..they love to hate us