these are so hard to compare omg please help! themes qoutes what questions could come up?? any help would be great lol
I'm doing them too: you're not the only one worrying! I think the main ideas i'm hoping will come up are greed, sin, or something about deception. Any snakey quote from Satan would help with those themes, compared with a slippery quote made by Volpone deceiving someone. Comparing volpone's deception of Celia or the mountebank crowd directly with the snake's deception of eve is interesting. Something i've found really interesting is the idea that Adam and Eve are not entirely free, as they are bound by God's rules and the hierarchy of eden, so maybe contrasting that with the free-for-all that is Jonson's venice could be good. There are good quotes for selfishness in both texts. I'm really up for a skype conversation about these texts if you or anyone else is - let me know, i'm home all of tomorrow! Good luck and don't stress it too much. Sam
Themes that I would like to come up are: deception and disguise flattery seduction and its consequences argument role of women relationships with God character flaws
Themes that I would like to come up are: deception and disguise flattery seduction and its consequences argument role of women relationships with God character flaws
Sounds good. I havent really thought about the role of women - any ideas for volpone?
I think celia is one of jonson's weakest characters. She's just kinda naive and boring. Maybe that shows that he doesn't really understand women or maybe it's just that he isnt very good at creating good characters. I guess thats all relevant - what do you think? Eve is much more interesting to me, but milton never shuts up about her being inferior to adam.
Hi guys! Thought I'd scrape onto this thread as I'm also doing these texts and don't know things...
Right now I'm making huge A3 revision posters (coloured card) in the form of a theme title at the top, then making a table comparing Volpone/PL quotes,then underlining quotes that particularly link together in different coloured pens. I don't know anything and it's the only thing that's mildly working. I can't even plan an essay yet. So far I've made tables for: Temptation, Greed, Flattery, and Persuasion. I intend to make tables for Morality, Pathos, possibly Use of Logic/Reason, and possibly Women
Sounds good. I havent really thought about the role of women - any ideas for volpone?
Imo that would be quite a hard question if it came up though as Celia and Lady Would-Be are the only ladies in Volpone! But I guess that Celia/Corvino and Lady Would-Be/Sir Pol show quite different power dynamics in marriage, and I guess you could compare it with PL, and talk about Milton's views on marriage/divorce?
Does anybody have any critics' views? All I have is the Yale university dude from the video that someone posted on the other thread, but I don't know his name any names would be appreciated! (But I swear AO3 is only 5 marks anyway, and AO4 is the main thing (10 marks)...?)
I think celia is one of jonson's weakest characters. She's just kinda naive and boring. Maybe that shows that he doesn't really understand women or maybe it's just that he isnt very good at creating good characters. I guess thats all relevant - what do you think? Eve is much more interesting to me, but milton never shuts up about her being inferior to adam.
Celia and Bonario are both super boring... I thought that maybe Jonson is just emphasising how sometimes the immoral characters are the most interesting? Mosca and Volpone's use of disguise/deception is certainly more interesting that the one-dimensional Bonario and Celia. So the audience condemn their immorality but at the same time they're tricked into being attracted to these terrible people (a lot like how Milton gets us to feel sorry for Satan) which makes them question their own moral compass.
Also, imo, Celia/Bonario seem to be the voice of morality in the play while in PL it is Milton's narrator/Muse. It's interesting to compare Celia's protests towards Corvino/Volpone around the rape scene - e.g "O, God and his good angels!" "Is shame fled human breasts?" to the morality/immorality of PL - the narrator Milton is always (annoyingly) stepping in to say e.g. "No more of talk where God or angel guest with Man" (I have my books in front of me as you can tell...) or "Much failing, hapless Eve!"
Celia and Bonario are both super boring... I thought that maybe Jonson is just emphasising how sometimes the immoral characters are the most interesting? Mosca and Volpone's use of disguise/deception is certainly more interesting that the one-dimensional Bonario and Celia. So the audience condemn their immorality but at the same time they're tricked into being attracted to these terrible people (a lot like how Milton gets us to feel sorry for Satan) which makes them question their own moral compass.
Also, imo, Celia/Bonario seem to be the voice of morality in the play while in PL it is Milton's narrator/Muse. It's interesting to compare Celia's protests towards Corvino/Volpone around the rape scene - e.g "O, God and his good angels!" "Is shame fled human breasts?" to the morality/immorality of PL - the narrator Milton is always (annoyingly) stepping in to say e.g. "No more of talk where God or angel guest with Man" (I have my books in front of me as you can tell...) or "Much failing, hapless Eve!"
I don't know...
yeah that 'much failing' quote is a good one. Milton seems genuinely frustrated with his own character
Aslong as you back up each point you make with quotes from the text and sometimes context as well as using atleast one critic in each paragraph it will be hard for the examiners to take marks away from you.
It's not like history or anything like that, they care mostly about your understanding of the texts and most interpretations are correct because there is no right or wrong GENERALLY in english lit
I don't think that it's necessarily vital to have a critic for each paragraph in this question, considering that the majority of Ao3 on this question at least, is tested on comparison between the two texts.