The Arsenal Thread XIX

Scroll to see replies

Reply 9460

qwerty_mad

Original post by sevchenko

Anybody else think Arteta and Rosicky should vacate their numbers?

Why?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 9461

B-Stacks

Original post by sevchenko

Anybody else think Arteta and Rosicky should vacate their numbers?

Lool, a bit harsh.

Reminds of how Szcz was number 13 for ages because Almunia still had the number one shirt.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 9462

Kim-Jong-Illest

rosickys number should be retired

Reply 9463

sevchenko

Original post by qwerty_mad

Why?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Give some of the younger members of the squad a chance to have their preferred numbers. Plus they are getting on now if we sign a DM they're appearance will be less anyway.

Original post by B-Stacks

Lool, a bit harsh.

Reminds of how Szcz was number 13 for ages because Almunia still had the number one shirt.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Out with the old and in with the new (Signings). tbf they're roles are becoming less and less in the first team. It's only fair they give Ramsey and Ox a chance at a number they want

Reply 9464

t()m

Disagree... Rosicky is a player who plays so hard and understands he's a squad player but when called upon you cc can never say he doesn't give it his all.. He deserves to keep the shirt number because of that.

Reply 9465

qwerty_mad

Original post by sevchenko

Give some of the younger members of the squad a chance to have their preferred numbers. Plus they are getting on now if we sign a DM they're appearance will be less anyway.

Out with the old and in with the new (Signings). tbf they're roles are becoming less and less in the first team. It's only fair they give Ramsey and Ox a chance at a number they want

No, that's harsh. Unless they voluntarily give it up, we shouldn't do that.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 9466

FKLW

Original post by Pete_91

Most of our players got injured in pre-season ffs...

Then we were generally fine until another injury streak at the turn of the year. If the injuries we get are more spread out then we'll be fine I think. Also last season was the worst we've had injury wise for at least 3 seasons.

It's always peak how big players are injured for the big matches. Tbh imo you missed Walcott the most, it's ironic how he gets crocked whereas Giroud has an injury-free season :lol:

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 9467

sevchenko

Original post by qwerty_mad

No, that's harsh. Unless they voluntarily give it up, we shouldn't do that.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Not force them ffs. I meant they should give their numbers up through their own accord just like Diaby

Reply 9468

Kim-Jong-Illest

give #2 to debuchy and #3 to gibbs

Reply 9469

username912610

So let me get this straight supposedly we get Sanchez do we announce it immediately or wait till July 10th to announce it?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 9470

ZÃ¼rich

Original post by Kruz

So let me get this straight supposedly we get Sanchez do we announce it immediately or wait till July 10th to announce it?

Posted from TSR Mobile

We'd probably try to announce it with Puma I think

Reply 9471

username912610

Original post by Zürich

We'd probably try to announce it with Puma I think

Oh ok fair enough. Some journalists are reporting it's a done deal others are saying we're still in talks.

Reply 9472

FKLW

Would Sanchez be just as big a buy, if not bigger, than Özil?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 9473

SHOO

Original post by FKLW

Would Sanchez be just as big a buy, if not bigger, than Özil?

Posted from TSR Mobile

I wouldn't say so, it would be huge and would be a massive statement of intent but I don't think it'll be as big as Ozil's

Reply 9474

De Chirico

"But... but... we didn't sign Fabregas..." Where are all those short-sighted ****ers now?

Reply 9475

ZÃ¼rich

Original post by FKLW

Would Sanchez be just as big a buy, if not bigger, than Özil?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Ozil was bigger as it sort of marked the transition to an era where we can actually spend the big money, arrivals like Sanchez can realistically be expected every summer in all honesty from now on.

Reply 9476

Kenan and Kel

Original post by De Chirico

"But... but... we didn't sign Fabregas..." Where are all those short-sighted ****ers now?

You still should have signed him. Chelsea have the league in their pockets.

Reply 9477

ZÃ¼rich

Original post by Kenan and Kel

You still should have signed him. Chelsea have the league in their pockets.

City still have the better squad, and their defence should improve substantially. Players like Costa/Fabregas are still inferior to Aguero/Silva by some distance. Mourinho will win nothing again next year I bet, hopefully even sacked mid-season in typical chav fashion :coma: