Old thread, but this can't be left unchallenged anymore... Some clarifications:
- Siesta is indeed biphasic, but that is a form of polyphasic, too. Poly just means multiple, ie more than one.
- The sentence "the problem with polyphasic sleeping is that it doesn't work" should be appended with "for me" or "for everyone" or similar, since obviously there are a bunch of guys and gals practising poslyphasic sleep with great success.
Arguing against the feasibility of sleeping polyphasic like some previous posts, has the problem of referencing a single source. While Piotr Wozniak (the man behind Super Memo) is most certainly a skilled and talented researcher, he seems to lack the ability to challenge theory with empirism. I'm not saying he is simply wrong, but the large amount of empiric studies of individuals around the world should tell him that "maybe I have missed something in my models/experiments?", or at least feel that his results are a little challenged. Instead he seems to go in defence of his own pride (or something, I can't really tell) and even try his best to humiliate those who actively experiment with sleep (calling it "comic relief" doesn't really make it any better). For me it is hard to take him seriously when he's acting like that. But sure, he presents impressive material and one should try to look beyond the arrogance in parts of his texts to absorb the outcome of his research.
I can tell you about my own experience with polyphasic sleep. During two of my university years I worked night shift. For social reasons, I ended up going to bed like most others, at 10-11pm, rose at 2am to go to work, went back to sleep at 6-6:30am and slept until I woke again. At the time I had no clue of the term polyphasic sleep or that I had actually implemented a biphasic sleep schedule. I only noticed that I seemed to need less sleep with this routine. After two years I went back to full-time studies and also went back to monophasic, like "normal people". Only lately I read up on polyphasic sleep patterns, and realised not only that a lot of people do this, but also that old documents suggest that pre-industrial humans often naturally slept biphasic, which is interesting. Also most other animals (all?) don't sleep monophasic, which suggests that it is not necessarily the only natural way to sleep. I was inspired to experiment with polyphasic sleep and since I started taking powernaps regularly (3x20 minutes a day), some six months ago, I wake up at night after approximately 3.5h of sleep. Apart from some "social obstacles" sometimes (people don't expect you to take naps in the day), I'm very happy with this routine. I think anyone can experiment to find something that works, but of course you should also pay attention to your health.
That said, there is science pointing at the necessity of one single core sleep, while there are empiric studies suggesting that, at least for some, sleeping in multiple phases works very well, not only for bloggers (who obviously amuse dr Wozniak) but also others like me, as well as friend and neighbours who by chance developed a sleeping routine of multiple phases. I would welcome more research in this area to sort out effects of polyphasic sleeping. Just saying "It doesn't work", pointing at a single source, when it *obviously* works for quite some, is just not good enough.