The Student Room Group

Giving notice to an employer

My employer requires me to give 28 days notice.

On 3 July 2014 I handed in my notice but I said I would like my last working day to be Friday 29th August.

My circumstances have now changed and I want to leave on Monday 4th August.

Because I said I would work until 29th August am I legally obliged to do so?

Can I finish on 4th August?

Thanks :smile:
Reply 1
Please help!
If your notice period is strictly applied, it needs to be 28 days from when you tell them. So if you tell them tomorrow, you can only leave on Tuesday 12th August.

Depends what your role is however and how flexible they are. If it's a role they can replace easily they might not mind.

I would tell them you now definitely want to leave on 12th August instead in line with your 28 days notice period, but that really you would like to leave a week earlier if possible but that you understand if it's not possible. Hopefully they'll be flexible!
Reply 3
Thanks so much for your reply. It's helped a lot.

I did tell them I was officially handing in my notice on 3rd July. But also in that email I stated my last working day would be 29th August.
Could I not finish on 4th August?


Original post by moutonfou
If your notice period is strictly applied, it needs to be 28 days from when you tell them. So if you tell them tomorrow, you can only leave on Tuesday 12th August.

Depends what your role is however and how flexible they are. If it's a role they can replace easily they might not mind.

I would tell them you now definitely want to leave on 12th August instead in line with your 28 days notice period, but that really you would like to leave a week earlier if possible but that you understand if it's not possible. Hopefully they'll be flexible!
Original post by Echo*12
Thanks so much for your reply. It's helped a lot.

I did tell them I was officially handing in my notice on 3rd July. But also in that email I stated my last working day would be 29th August.
Could I not finish on 4th August?


Id speak to them tomorrow to find out.
Original post by Echo*12
X


There are two things to keep in mind here.

The first is that in a technical sense you are legally obligated to work until your notice date. However, their only legal recourse if you leave earlier would be to take you to small claims court.

That would be far more than it's worth for them. The second consideration is what is a good reference from them worth? They might not sue you, but equally they might give you a bad reference if you leave early.

You should weigh up those two things. If you have a job already lined up that starts on the 4th, then it might be worth just leaving on the 4th, and saying to them you simply cannot serve out your notice period, and you are willing to forfeit the pay from that notice period.

But if the reason you want to finish early is that you have booked a holiday, or a similarly self-absorbed excuse, then you're just being a selfish crybaby and you should serve out your notice period

Tell us why you don't want to serve your notice period
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by moutonfou
If your notice period is strictly applied, it needs to be 28 days from when you tell them


That's categorically false, the statutory notice period if you have been employed for less than 2 years is one week.

However, statutory notice period can be overriden by contractual notice period. Her notice period might be one week, or 10 days, or two weeks, or three weeks or 14.75682 days

Saying it's 28 days is irresponsibly ignorant, and you shouldn't go around misinforming people thinking your knowledge of her legal and contractual situation is greater than it clearly appears to be (or not be, as the case is)
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by Echo*12
Thanks so much for your reply. It's helped a lot.

I did tell them I was officially handing in my notice on 3rd July. But also in that email I stated my last working day would be 29th August.
Could I not finish on 4th August?


What does your contract say? Your contract should specify a notice period.

If it does not, then the statutory notice period of one week applies
Original post by mostcivilised
That's categorically false, the statutory notice period if you have been employed for less than 2 years is one week.

However, statutory notice period can be overriden by contractual notice period. Her notice period might be one week, or 10 days, or two weeks, or three weeks.

Saying it's 28 days is irresponsibly ignorant, and you shouldn't go around misinforming people thinking your knowledge of her legal and contractual situation is greater than it clearly appears to be (or not be, as the case is)


Errr the OP themselves started their post with My employer requires me to give 28 days notice.
Original post by moutonfou
Errr the OP themselves started their post with My employer requires me to give 28 days notice.


Plenty of employers don't have a clue about what their contractual notice period actually states. 28 days is very high and I find it simply exceptionally unlikely that this is the case. 14 days is far more likely for a contract of that sort.

If she can post a pic of her contract showing it is that length, then fine. But until then, I'm very skeptical
Reply 10
My reason is that I'm doing this job as a placement year as part of my university degree. My contract was due to end on 31st July and it was extended until until 31st July 2015. I explained I have to go back to Uni so I handed in my notice to finish on 29th August.

I was under the impression that they would like me to take a week off August to complete my university work which has a deadline of 22nd August. They declined my request of annual leave.
This has put me in a difficult position as I now have a looming deadline, loads of Uni work to do and a full time job.
I know it sounds very complicated!




Original post by mostcivilised
There are two things to keep in mind here.

The first is that in a technical sense you are legally obligated to work until your notice date. However, their only legal recourse if you leave earlier would be to take you to small claims court.

That would be far more than it's worth for them. The second consideration is what is a good reference from them worth? They might not sue you, but equally they might give you a bad reference if you leave early.

You should weigh up those two things. If you have a job already lined up that starts on the 4th, then it might be worth just leaving on the 4th, and saying to them you simply cannot serve out your notice period, and you are willing to forfeit the pay from that notice period.

But if the reason you want to finish early is that you have booked a holiday, or a similarly self-absorbed excuse, then you're just being a selfish crybaby and you should serve out your notice period

Tell us why you don't want to serve your notice period
Reply 11
My manager told me it was 28 days. I will check my contract tomorrow morning and post a pic on here to let you know :smile:

Original post by mostcivilised
Plenty of employers don't have a clue about what their contractual notice period actually states. 28 days is very high and I find it simply exceptionally unlikely that this is the case. 14 days is far more likely for a contract of that sort.

If she can post a pic of her contract showing it is that length, then fine. But until then, I'm very skeptical
Original post by Echo*12
My reason is that I'm doing this job as a placement year as part of my university degree. My contract was due to end on 31st July and it was extended until until 31st July 2015. I explained I have to go back to Uni so I handed in my notice to finish on 29th August.

I was under the impression that they would like me to take a week off August to complete my university work which has a deadline of 22nd August. They declined my request of annual leave.
This has put me in a difficult position as I now have a looming deadline, loads of Uni work to do and a full time job.
I know it sounds very complicated!


If your contract says 28 days then it's 28 days, we have no reason to disbelieve your ability to read so not sure why shorter periods are being discussed.

EDIT: Just seen you went on manager's word, yeah check that **** out. Don't post a pic of your contract, both for confidentiality (it will likely make it easy to idenify the firm) and because there may be minor intellectual property issues around the right to publish it.

Tomorrow state a desire to leave on the 4th, 28 days from your original notice. If this is rejected then say the 12th, 28 days from now.

How hard you negotiate for the fourth is up to you, in the cirumstances it doesn't seem a massive amount of skin off your nose to work until 12th (you don't need those 8 days specifically, just time off generally before the end of August), particularly given you will presumably be relying on them for a reference for grad jobs.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by Echo*12

I was under the impression that they would like me to take a week off August to complete my university work which has a deadline of 22nd August. They declined my request of annual leave.
This has put me in a difficult position as I now have a looming deadline, loads of Uni work to do and a full time job.
I know it sounds very complicated!


It sounds perfectly reasonable to me, I'd encourage you to tell your manager tomorrow that you are giving notice to cease work on 4th August. They really can't force you to continue working

That is technically a breach of contract, but the only real damages I could foresee is that they don't pay you for the period after August 4th (which s perfectly fine because you wouldn't be working after August 4th).

If they could prove some genuine, fundamental damage it caused to their business (like you leaving early caused them to miss out on a ÂŁ1 million contract, or something like that), then yes they could sue you for damages. But otherwise, I very much doubt they would pursue it and I doubt any judge would look favourably on a suit.

You are probably safe to leave before your notice period.
Reply 14
Original post by Echo*12
Thanks so much for your reply. It's helped a lot.

I did tell them I was officially handing in my notice on 3rd July. But also in that email I stated my last working day would be 29th August.
Could I not finish on 4th August?


Just to summarise (it may have already been said above), you didn't give your 28 day notice on the 3rd of July as you stated you would work until late August. If you now want to give your 28 day notice, then you would be giving it now so have 28 days to serve (strictly speaking).

Original post by mostcivilised
That's categorically false, the statutory notice period if you have been employed for less than 2 years is one week.

However, statutory notice period can be overriden by contractual notice period. Her notice period might be one week, or 10 days, or two weeks, or three weeks or 14.75682 days

Saying it's 28 days is irresponsibly ignorant, and you shouldn't go around misinforming people thinking your knowledge of her legal and contractual situation is greater than it clearly appears to be (or not be, as the case is)


You seem to have got unnecessarily riled up at someone just trying to help the OP? What the hell is he supposed to base it on? That's the info the OP provided.
Original post by mostcivilised
It sounds perfectly reasonable to me, I'd encourage you to tell your manager tomorrow that you are giving notice to cease work on 4th August.They really can't force you to continue working
That is technically a breach of contract, but the only real damages I could foresee is that they don't pay you for the period after August 4th (which s perfectly fine because you wouldn't be working after August 4th).

If they could prove some genuine, fundamental damage it caused to their business (like you leaving early caused them to miss out on a ÂŁ1 million contract, or something like that), then yes they could sue you for damages. But otherwise, I very much doubt they would pursue it and I doubt any judge would look favourably on a suit.

You are probably safe to leave before your notice period.



I think the issue is more his reference, given it's his year in industry, presumably, he's going to want a pretty good one out of them for grad jobs, and as a stude he's not going to be able to afford to sue them for negligent misstatement if they give one so bad it's false.
Reply 16
Thank you everyone for your replies. It really has helped :smile:

I spoke to my manager and it's 28 days from when I initially handed in my notice (3rd July). So my last day can be 4th August.
Glad it's been sorted! :smile:
Reply 17
The issue was always the reference. Which is why I was cautious and asked advice for on here.
They questioned my productivity this week and tried to accuse me of fiddling with data to make it look like I've done more work. All of which is untrue. And I raised the point that if my productivity was low it should've been mentioned earlier so I had time to progress.
My manager has also denied something's she's said to me in one-to-one meetings. Which has caused tension.
I've worked so, so hard all year and so upset that this situation is going to overshadow everything. And I don't know why they've turned on me.
I'm trying to keep it as amicable as possible. But I think I should cut my losses, leave on 4th August and focus on my final year of university and prepare for that.


Original post by Le Nombre
I think the issue is more his reference, given it's his year in industry, presumably, he's going to want a pretty good one out of them for grad jobs, and as a stude he's not going to be able to afford to sue them for negligent misstatement if they give one so bad it's false.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending