Ethnic minority organisations - why it is time white British people had them

What a childish answer. "Well, why not?" is not a valid justification for doing anything.

Why would you want to organize people of the same ethnic group? It's bad enough that we even have to have ethnic groups in the first place. If you want to socialise with other people then do so, in a club, a community centre or wherever. To theme a organisation/group around your ethnic group has to be the most anti-social and primitive idea you could have.

I'm no more likely to like the company of a white British person than any other kind of person. If you want to create a 'cultural club' that would be different, because that would be solely a historical/cultural club that would focus on traditions and learning of history (similar to that of black history clubs). Then it wouldn't be such a backward and primitive idea.

Why must we prevent it?

Multicultuwlism was the primitive idea. Please be quiet, you people are racists, nobody asked for mass immigration, diveristy or to be subtracted for a race multiculturalists like you view as superior and therefore MUST be here. You're A, every retaliation is B and a rightful one. Multixultialsm is an invasion, multicultualism was a word invented in the 70's to justify your race plots to displace an entire race by replacing them with millions of other people. Labour admitted it also

Because white British people have a right to exist and a right to preserve their cultural and ethnic identity in their own ancestral homeland, just like everybody else on this planet.

Ah the white genocide fallacy. Where racists can justify their racism by pretending they are the victim.

If this right actually exists, then what do you make of the USA and Australia, whose indigenous populations have been pretty much replaced?

Secondly, what makes you think that the white British population is even decreasing?

The anti-white fallacy: If you exult and herald the "diversity" and "vibrancy" as white people are systematically replaced in their homeland and its institutions by those of other races then you are not a racist.

....

90% of the uk is white, I don't see how we are being "replaced". Secondly even if it were the case that the country was turning black or brown for me the colour of my neighbours skin is irrelevant.

[video="youtube;faNge-o0V-k"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faNge-o0V-k[/video]

You might be indifferent but for your information the white British population of England & Wales was 80.5% at the 2011 census, however the total in many large towns and cities is significantly lower.

Bedford 80.8% (2001) - 71.5% (2011)
Birmingham 65.6% (2001) - 53.1% (2011)
Blackburn 76.1% (2001) - 66.5% (2011)
Bristol 88.0% (2001) - 77.9% (2011)
Bradford 76.1% (2001) - 63.9% (2011)
Brighton 88.0% (2001) - 80.5% (2011)
Bournemouth 92.5% (2001) - 83.8% (2011)
Cardiff 88.3% (2001) - 80.3% (2011)
Cambridge 78.5% (2001) - 66.0% (2011)
Coventry 78.3% (2001) - 66.6% (2011)
Crawley 84.5% (2001) - 72.1% (2011)
Derby 84.4% (2001) - 75.3% (2011)
Gravesham 87.2% (2001) - 77.1% (2011)
Ipswich 90.8% (2001) - 82.9% (2011)
Kirklees 83.7% (2001) - 76.7% (2011)
Leeds 89.2% (2001) - 81.1% (2011)
Leicester 60.5% (2001) - 45.1% (2011)
Liverpool 91.8% (2001) - 84.8 (2011)
Luton 65.0% (2001) - 44.6% (2011)
Manchester 74.5% (2001) - 59.3% (2011)
Milton Keynes 86.8% (2001) - 73.9% (2011)
Newcastle 90.7% (2001) - 81.9% (2011)
Northampton 87.7% (2001) - 76.6% (2011)
Norwich 93.5% (2001) - 84.7% (2011)
Nottingham 81.1% (2001) - 65.4% (2011)
Oxford 76.8% (2001) - 63.6% (2011)
Peterborough 85.75 (2001) - 70.9% (2011)
Portsmouth 91.9% (2001) - 84.0% (2011)
Preston 83.1% (2001) - 75.8% (2011)
Reading 80.6% (2001) - 65.3% (2011)
Sandwell 78.0% (2001) - 65.8% (2011)
Sheffield 89.2% (2001) - 80.8% (2011)
Slough 58.3% (2001) - 34.5% (2011)
Southampton 88.7% (2001) - 77.7% (2011)
Swansea 95.7% (2001) - 91.5% (2011)
Walsall 85.2% (2001) - 76.9% (2011)
Wolverhampton 75.4% (2001) - 64.5% (2011)
Wycombe 83.6% (2001) - 75.9% (2011)

An Oxford-based professor of demography predicts that white Britons will be in the minority by 2066: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/10032296/White-Britons-will-be-minority-by-2066-says-professor.html

Not being replaced? One in three babies has at least one parent born abroad - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2317411/One-babies-England-parent-born-abroad.html

I'm sorry, but I'm not going to watch a crude 13 minute animation from "WhiteRabbitRadioTV". It's hardly going to be the most fair and neutral of sources on this topic, is it? If you have a point to make, it would be preferable if you posted it in text form.

Perhaps you would rather watch a Marxist Jew denying white genocide as per Last Day Leper's post, as I suspect that tallies more neatly with your worldview.

I wonder if this text is succinct enough for you:

.................based on if the immigration rates stayed the same as they were at the time. It's unlikely immigration will stay as high as it has been over the last 10 or so years. Going by history, immigration tends to peak then taper off. They said the same stuff in the 50s when blacks and indians etc were coming from the colonies. 60 years later the uk is still 90% white, england is still 85% white with 80% being of british origin.

In any case I see no reason to hold the view that the uk should stay white. I can't feel any affiliation towards people simply based on such an arbitrary relation such as skin colour.

The immigrants for the most part will still have a homeland where they are comfortably in the majority. This will not be true of the English people in England whose children will find their homeland replaced by the Tower of Babel.

.................. but the uk is still 90% white. Maybe I'm wrong but last time I checked 90% was a majority.