The Student Room Group

Does Pootin want war with the West?

Could the missile strike on flight MH17 been a deliberate action to invoke a war?

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/07/26/opinion/francona-russian-artillery-ukraine-future/index.html?hpt=hp_c1

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
No, he's not (that) insane. Because he'd lose.
Reply 2
Putin

Pootin :london:
Same difference.
Original post by Drewski
No, he's not (that) insane. Because he'd lose.


Pootin can cut the gas supply any time and cripple the EU.
Reply 5
Original post by perfectsymbology
Poot can cut the gas supply any time and cripple the EU.


So? We have other fuels.

If he starts a shooting war, he loses. Simple as that. And he knows that, which is why it's never going to happen.
If he went to war, he would lose, he has nothing to gain from that. The thing is, he more scared of the West than the West should be of him.
I wonder who's side China would come down on though? That's the unknown factor here. It's no secret China would love to topple the US as the global superpower.
(edited 9 years ago)
Putin doesn't want war, he is a great white bear who kicks out the immigrants, good for him, Russia should be Caucasian.
Reply 9
Original post by Drewski
So? We have other fuels.

If he starts a shooting war, he loses. Simple as that. And he knows that, which is why it's never going to happen.


Other energy sources aren't secure and other type of fuels aren't efficient enough to meet the demand of many countries, since we consume a lot and are extremely eligible on energy.

A LOT of European countries still rely on Russia, since there are no better alternative.
Original post by perfectsymbology
I wonder who's side China would come down on though? That's the unknown factor here. It's no secret China would love to topple the US as the global superpower.


The Chinese are more interested in money and trade, they would probably tell Putin to pipe down and not harm potential exports to the West
Original post by perfectsymbology
Could the missile strike on flight MH17 been a deliberate action to invoke a war?

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/07/26/opinion/francona-russian-artillery-ukraine-future/index.html?hpt=hp_c1


No. The air and naval advantage that western Europe has is overwhelming.

As per your gas point, Europe has plenty of coal which can be pushed through parliament and built in under a year.

As per your China point, they don't need war to become a superpower (neither does India).

The European flag would be over Moscow on 6 months excluding nukes.
Reply 12
Original post by yo radical one
The Chinese are more interested in money and trade, they would probably tell Putin to pipe down and not harm potential exports to the West


Or maybe they won't do nothing at all and just watch.
Reply 13
Original post by perfectsymbology
I wonder who's side China would come down on though? That's the unknown factor here. It's no secret China would love to topple the US as the global superpower.


No one's. People seem to have this fantasy of an anti US alliance made up of China, Russia and whoever else gets tacked on. China has very different interests to Russia, in many cases they are actually rivals.
Original post by perfectsymbology
Could the missile strike on flight MH17 been a deliberate action to invoke a war?

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/07/26/opinion/francona-russian-artillery-ukraine-future/index.html?hpt=hp_c1


No, it is the other way around if anything. This whole issue in Ukraine is the doing of the EU and their interfering.
Pootis*
Reply 16
The Ukranian govt should allow the east to have a referendum.
Original post by Rakas21
As per your gas point, Europe has plenty of coal which can be pushed through parliament and built in under a year.


You mean re-open the mines?
Reply 18
Any areas voting to leave Ukraine would be allowed to form their own new nation - prob a Russian satellite. Everyone wins.
Pootin though. :hahaha:

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending