The Israel/Palestine Conflict Mk. IV

The Times of Israel: 'When Genocide is Permissible'

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/israelgaza-conflict-when-genocide-is-permissible-article-removed-from-the-times-of-israel-website-9643888.html

You would destroy everyone who is not a white Aryan, straight, healthy German?

That wasn't Hitlers position at all actually.

A gross, emotional straw-man/exaggeration of his ethnic views and actions.

I'm well aware of Hitler's position. I'm also well aware where it would have gone should he have won WWII

If you want to clarify what you believe to be Hitler's position, please do. However, it id undeniable that ethnic minorities, homosexuals, and the disabled were all persecuted under his rule. Were he to expand, the slavs would have followed. Then, no doubt the Arabs.

6 ceasefires either rejected or broken by palestinians.

Hence world leaders are far less critical of Israel. They know that the terrorist entity is at fault.

Israeli figures show 47% of those killed thus far are terrorists. According to Israeli sources, they have names and photos for many of them proving they were affiliated to terrorist groups. Evidence will be presented to investigators.

Time to embarrass the propaganda merchants at the UN with their "85% civilians" nonsense.

Because no government has ever falsified or twisted figures to boost there own cause in a combat situation or war.

She could be wrong or she could be right, who knows. Its good PR for Israel nonetheless and their fight against Quranimals

No, you can't deliberately hurt civilians under International Law, however you can target such things as factories producing arms, homes used as military shelters and anyone who is by any means associated with combat and military. The lines become blurred when civilians pick up arms, and then leave them again.

I don't have my International Law textbook, otherwise I could have made this a lot clearer.

Either way, Israel is not targeting civilians, all of its targets are involved with Hamas, if civilians happen to die in those, then I believe that does not count as deliberately targeting civilians, because their target was the military shelter (for example), not whatever civilians happened to stand there.

I am well aware they are scum. But all I am saying is more can be done to reduce innocent casualties. The IDF respect for human life isn't much better than that of Hamas in my opinion.

Hitler believed(from his private writings, discussions, documents and manifestos) in the unity and supremacy of the Nordic race as a whole, with a special place for the German Aryan as the Ideal candiate.

Contrary to popular belief, he didn't view non Aryan Caucasians as inherently inferior or that they need to be exterminated.
He also had a overwhelming respect for the Asians(specifically the Japanese) in which he openly stated that there culture and history was far superior to the Germans, and he had open admiration for there Nationalist strength and determination.

The concept(you stated) that all Non-Germans would have been purged is absolute nonsense, and not an idea supported by his actions during the War or his writings and conversations prior and during it either.

Hitler was a psychopath. His 'writings' were ridden with contradictions. I believe this idea was supported, because otherwise he wouldn't have thrown every non german he could get his hands on in a furnace. Not to mention disabled or homosexual germans.

Oh right, that's in your "expert" military opinion, is it? Everyone becomes an armchair military expert on what is disproportionate in wartime since the start of this conflict. Given Hamas sites their assets and operatives in civilian areas, what would be the "correct" percentage of civilian casualties?

I never said that the 2014 Gaza war is a retaliation for what happened in Jordan in 1970, lol. I did mention those periods however as all that was happening before Hamas even existed. This goes back as far as 1920 when the Palestinian Arabs started massacring the Palestinian Jews. These Arabs have been anything but peaceful.

Palestinian civilians are no more victims than Israeli civilians are. This phenomenon of not many Israeli dying is relatively new, only back in 2002 more than 1,500 Israelis were killed entirely through suicide bombings. Anyway, that aside, I think if we're speaking of 'solutions' it should be obvious through history that solutions are either military or they are diplomatic. How exactly does feeling sorry for civilians (I most certainly do not feel sorry for them, they are hateful savages who would murder any Jew given the chance) help bring a solution? Are you sure this is the logical side of you rather than the emotional one?

How on earth is this Israel's fault? I think its insincere that people say 'Israel must withdraw to 67' lines' and yet when Israel does do this, theyre still somehow to blame for whatever happens next. In 2005 Ariel Sharon cleansed Gaza from Jews and gave the entire thing back, no blockades no nothing. People used to say "Gaza can now become the Singapore of the Middle East". Its the pals that elected Hamas and fired rockets at Israel, how on earth is this Israel's fault? what is this 'pressure' you want to put on Israel? give them more land? they have 0 claims over Israeli territory. When are you going to accept the simple truth that these muslims are violent savages that dont understand the language of diplomacy? theyve violated 6 ceasefires. Its like pressuring the US to negotiate with Al Qaeda.